So where did we land on this?
Are we putting them back on the 'awaiting sponsor' list or do they need
to be moved to the 'closed' list (because they aren't going to get fixed)?
Thanks.
Bonnie
On 01/15/10 03:39 PM, Willi Burmeister wrote:
Hi Ethan,
These three bugs are back on the
They should go on awaiting-sponsor, please.
On Jan 20, 2010, at 8:02 AM, Bonnie Corwin wrote:
So where did we land on this?
Are we putting them back on the 'awaiting sponsor' list or do they need to be
moved to the 'closed' list (because they aren't going to get fixed)?
Thanks.
On 01/20/10 08:10 AM, Eric J. Ray wrote:
They should go on awaiting-sponsor, please.
Ok - will do.
Thanks.
Bonnie
On Jan 20, 2010, at 8:02 AM, Bonnie Corwin wrote:
So where did we land on this?
Are we putting them back on the 'awaiting sponsor' list or do they need to
be moved to
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Ethan Quach ethan.quach at sun.com wrote:
FYI,
These three bugs are back on the 'awaiting sponsor' list because
the sponsor is no longer with Sun.
6424003 - pkginfo -l can't handle long package names properly
606 - Package name length definitions
Peter Tribble wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Ethan Quach ethan.quach at sun.com wrote:
FYI,
These three bugs are back on the 'awaiting sponsor' list because
the sponsor is no longer with Sun.
6424003 - pkginfo -l can't handle long package names properly
606 - Package name
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 8:29 PM, James Carlson carlsonj at workingcode.com
wrote:
Peter Tribble wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Ethan Quach ethan.quach at sun.com wrote:
FYI,
These three bugs are back on the 'awaiting sponsor' list because
the sponsor is no longer with Sun.
Peter Tribble wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 8:29 PM, James Carlson carlsonj at workingcode.com
wrote:
Won't these things still be issues for third-party packages?
Third-party? Doubtful that they would use package names as long as
SUNWstaroffice-gnome-integration.
Good point. Given that
