Pete Bentley wrote:
> On 5 Jan 2008, at 13:46, Archana wrote:
>
>> Hello ,
>> I had previously send the fix for this bug, but i cant find it now,
>> so I am sending it again.
>>
>>
>> ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&mod_lock));
>>
>> if ((fp = ctf_bufopen(&ctfsect, &symsect, &strsect, error)) == NULL)
crubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/request-sponsor/attachments/20080107/9c722991/attachment.html>
Frank Hofmann wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>
>> Pete Bentley wrote:
>>> Judging from the number of similar postings, I'm guessing that some
>>> professor at the Amrita School of Engineering has set "Find and fix a
>>> Solaris bug" as a piece of coursework for an under
We ( me and Rajath ) would like to withdraw the request for the following bugs
6598915 , 6298948
Sorry for the inconvenience caused.
--
Regards
Ashwin Bhat K S (OS0144)
Rajath Shanbag(OS0177)
Hi,
Apparently bug 6540812 was recently fixed in Build 80 so I moved this
request to the red section of the table (Accounted for By Means Other
Than Putback).
I have no idea why the contributor wasn't contacted for this work. My
sincere apologies that omission.
Bonnie
Indu V wrote:
> I am Indu V from Amrita School of Engineering. I am interested in
> working on bugid 6508640 .
>
> 6508640 : Firefox default page for Solaris Dev release needs a link
> Category/Subcategory: firefox:doc
Sorry, but this change was already integrated several months ago - the
bu
Hi Jayahari,
6455590 already has a 'Responsible Engineer' set. Besides, this bug is
being fixed with 6455603.
Please make sure the 'Responsible Engineer' field is empty before
picking up the bug.
Regards,
Kini
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 13:12 -, Jayahari K R wrote:
}Hai
}We are Jayahari a
Hi Yamuna,
From the description, this bug appears to be fixed.
Please select a different bug.
Regards,
Kini
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 19:57 -, yamuna j wrote:
}I am Yamuna Jathavedan from Amrita School of Engineering. I am interested in
}working on bugid5023963
}I'll be submitting a fix te
nks & Regards,
Rishi M Nair
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/request-sponsor/attachments/20080107/df5cba66/attachment.html>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Rishi M Nair
>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/request-sponsor/attachments/20080107/5bbcf6f2/attachment.html>
*
Thanks & Regards,
Rishi M Nair
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/request-sponsor/attachments/20080107/cb1d0fd3/attachment.html>
Thanks & Regards,
Rishi M Nair
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/request-sponsor/attachments/20080107/45b55770/attachment.html>
On Jan 7, 2008 11:36 AM, Rishi M Nair wrote:
>
> sir i also like to know more about cstyle clean
>
Review here:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/documentation/getting_started_docs/cstyle.ms.pdf
and here:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/on/devref_toc/devref_7/#7_2_style_guide
(g
Hi Balagopal,
Your email cites two different bugs:
6392640
6319973
6319973 already has a contribution offered. It is #75 under "Awaiting
Sponsor" on the request-sponsor table.
Do you want to request a sponsor for 6392640?
Thank you.
Bonnie
Balagopal R wrote:
> I am Balagopal from Amrita Sc
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Rishi M Nair wrote:
>Hi ,
>
>I would like to work on the bug :6469178 and will finish working on it
>within 1 week.
>Bug ID 6469178
>Synopsis clean up scp.c and make it cstyle clean
>Category:Subcategory ssh:commands
Rishi, this CR already has a responsible engineer
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Rishi M Nair wrote:
>Hi ,
>
>I would like to work on the bug :5082979 and will finish working on it
>within 1 week.
>Bug ID 5082979
>Synopsis erroneous message, "Corrupted MAC on inupt" displayed when memory
>is low
> Category:Subcategory ssh:commands
I can work on
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Rishi M Nair wrote:
> Hi ,
>>
>> I would like to work on the bug :6457482 and will finish working on it
>> within 3 Days.
>> Bug ID 6457482
>> Synopsis remove unnecessary calls for initgroups() from sshd
>> Category:Subcategory ssh:commands
>>
>My SCA number is : OS0148
>My
Hello
I have the fix ready for the following bug:
Bug ID: 6355611
Synopsis: setbuf misuse
Description: A subtle bug exists in fmt.c (using the source cross referencer
the bug is visible else where). main() calls setbug passing a buffer that
exists in main's stack. It can occur that the data in
18 matches
Mail list logo