[request-sponsor] Subscribe Request

2010-01-15 Thread Vijay S Balakrishna

[request-sponsor] Subscribe Request

2010-01-15 Thread Alan Coopersmith
To subscribe, unsubscribe or change your subscription options, see: http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/request-sponsor -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering

[request-sponsor] three requests back on the 'awaiting sponsor' list

2010-01-15 Thread Ethan Quach
FYI, These three bugs are back on the 'awaiting sponsor' list because the sponsor is no longer with Sun. 6424003 - pkginfo -l can't handle long package names properly 606 - Package name length definitions inconsistent 6443055 - pkgchk and pkgtrans are not able to deal with 32 char package

[request-sponsor] three requests back on the 'awaiting sponsor' list

2010-01-15 Thread Peter Tribble
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Ethan Quach wrote: > FYI, > > These three bugs are back on the 'awaiting sponsor' list because > the sponsor is no longer with Sun. > > > 6424003 - pkginfo -l can't handle long package names properly > 606 - Package name length definitions inconsistent > > 6443

[request-sponsor] three requests back on the 'awaiting sponsor' list

2010-01-15 Thread James Carlson
Peter Tribble wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Ethan Quach wrote: >> FYI, >> >> These three bugs are back on the 'awaiting sponsor' list because >> the sponsor is no longer with Sun. >> >> >> 6424003 - pkginfo -l can't handle long package names properly >> 606 - Package name length de

[request-sponsor] three requests back on the 'awaiting sponsor' list

2010-01-15 Thread Peter Tribble
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 8:29 PM, James Carlson wrote: > Peter Tribble wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Ethan Quach wrote: >>> FYI, >>> >>> These three bugs are back on the 'awaiting sponsor' list because >>> the sponsor is no longer with Sun. >>> >>> >>> 6424003 - pkginfo -l can't hand

[request-sponsor] three requests back on the 'awaiting sponsor' list

2010-01-15 Thread James Carlson
Peter Tribble wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 8:29 PM, James Carlson > wrote: >> Won't these things still be issues for third-party packages? > > Third-party? Doubtful that they would use package names as long as > SUNWstaroffice-gnome-integration. Good point. Given that the packages would fa

[request-sponsor] three requests back on the 'awaiting sponsor' list

2010-01-15 Thread Willi Burmeister
Hi Ethan, > These three bugs are back on the 'awaiting sponsor' list because > the sponsor is no longer with Sun. > > 6424003 - pkginfo -l can't handle long package names properly > 606 - Package name length definitions inconsistent > 6443055 - pkgchk and pkgtrans are not able to deal with 32