[request-sponsor] Re: [osol-discuss] Contributing Code

2006-03-08 Thread Danek Duvall
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:40:39PM -0700, Sanjay Nadkarni wrote: > I will back this up from the request sponser POV. In my case an RPE engineer > had already fixed the bug and putback into Nevada. However we don't require > people to update the "fixed" in bugster. People have suggested that w

[request-sponsor] Re: [sfwnv-discuss] Re: What about VIM (vi Improved?)

2006-05-24 Thread Danek Duvall
I think that asking the studio folks if they could remove their gvim and simply depend on the one delivered by the WOS. This would only apply for Nevada and forward -- they could continue to ship gvim in their S10 DVD. You'd probably need to compile in certain options (they ship gvim netbeans- rea