[request-sponsor] no response for 6299120

2008-03-07 Thread Darren J Moffat
Bonnie Corwin wrote:
 When a bug is moved to 'suspended', it is by definition available to 
 anyone to pick up.  The original contributor can come back later and 
 request a sponsor again or someone else can pick it up and request a 
 sponsor.

So what is the reason for having a suspended state in that case it seems 
no different to back on the available list.

-- 
Darren J Moffat



[request-sponsor] no response for 6299120

2008-03-06 Thread Bonnie Corwin
Sean Sprague wrote:
 Bonnie,
 
 Thanks very much for the update, Tom.  I'll move this to 'suspended'.

 Bonnie

 Tom Whitten wrote:
 I've agreed to sponsor 6299120, but I've been unable to establish 
 contact
 with Aswathy.S or Sruthi.P.Deep.  I think that we should return 
 6299120 to
 the pool of available bugs.

 Aswathy or Sruthi if you still wish to work on this bug, please 
 contact me.
 
 Tom appears to have been the victim of sponsoring fixes to two bugs 
 here (this plus 6319973), for which he has sadly received no contact of 
 late from the other side. From this, and that you have moved the status 
 to suspended, is there a mechanism that moves the bugs from 
 suspended to available again - no-one gave a crap last time? 
 Otherwise the suspended pool might grow and grow...
 
 Regards... Sean.

Hi Sean,

When a bug is moved to 'suspended', it is by definition available to 
anyone to pick up.  The original contributor can come back later and 
request a sponsor again or someone else can pick it up and request a 
sponsor.

That said, a quick check leads me to believe that this information is 
perhaps not actually on the website..so let me think about how to 
make this more clear..suggestions welcome.

Thanks.

Bonnie





[request-sponsor] no response for 6299120

2008-03-05 Thread Bonnie Corwin
Thanks very much for the update, Tom.  I'll move this to 'suspended'.

Bonnie

Tom Whitten wrote:
 I've agreed to sponsor 6299120, but I've been unable to establish contact
 with Aswathy.S or Sruthi.P.Deep.  I think that we should return 6299120 to
 the pool of available bugs.
 
 Aswathy or Sruthi if you still wish to work on this bug, please contact me.
 
 tom
 ___
 request-sponsor mailing list
 request-sponsor at opensolaris.org




[request-sponsor] no response for 6299120

2008-03-05 Thread Sean Sprague
Bonnie,

 Thanks very much for the update, Tom.  I'll move this to 'suspended'.
 
 Bonnie
 
 Tom Whitten wrote:
 I've agreed to sponsor 6299120, but I've been unable to establish contact
 with Aswathy.S or Sruthi.P.Deep.  I think that we should return 6299120 to
 the pool of available bugs.

 Aswathy or Sruthi if you still wish to work on this bug, please contact me.

Tom appears to have been the victim of sponsoring fixes to two bugs here 
(this plus 6319973), for which he has sadly 
received no contact of late from the other side. From this, and that you have 
moved the status to suspended, is there 
a mechanism that moves the bugs from suspended to available again - no-one 
gave a crap last time? Otherwise the 
suspended pool might grow and grow...

Regards... Sean.