[Resin-interest] srun vs server ?

2008-12-11 Thread Vinny
Hello All,
Still working on my Apache/Resin issues and looking through the docs I found
:

http://caucho.com/resin-3.1/doc/install-apache.xtp#Configuring%20resin.conf

In the wild I have seen both this:

 cluster
  *srun server-id= host=127.0.0.1 port=6802/*
/cluster

and this:

 !-- define the servers in the cluster --
server id= address=127.0.0.1 port=6802/

which one is correct when using mod_caucho but not using a cluster?
Tnanks





The future is here. It's just not widely distributed yet.
-William Gibson
___
resin-interest mailing list
resin-interest@caucho.com
http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest


Re: [Resin-interest] srun vs server ?

2008-12-11 Thread Scott Ferguson


On Dec 11, 2008, at 7:42 AM, Vinny wrote:


Hello All,
Still working on my Apache/Resin issues and looking through the docs  
I found :


http://caucho.com/resin-3.1/doc/install-apache.xtp#Configuring%20resin.conf

In the wild I have seen both this:
 cluster
  srun server-id= host=127.0.0.1 port=6802/
/cluster


and this:

 !-- define the servers in the cluster --
server id= address=127.0.0.1 port=6802/

which one is correct when using mod_caucho but not using a cluster?


They're equivalent.  The first one is the old, Resin 3.0 syntax for  
backward compatibility.


In Resin 3.1, every server belongs to a cluster because we want one  
unified deployment model, not a bunch of different cases.  If you have  
a single server, it belongs to a cluster with one server.  In previous  
versions, clustering was a feature, but now it's part of the  
architecture.


-- Scott



Tnanks





The future is here. It's just not widely distributed yet.
-William Gibson
___
resin-interest mailing list
resin-interest@caucho.com
http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest


___
resin-interest mailing list
resin-interest@caucho.com
http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest


Re: [Resin-interest] srun vs server ?

2008-12-11 Thread Vinny
Ah, got it.
Thanks


The future is here. It's just not widely distributed yet.
-William Gibson


On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Scott Ferguson f...@caucho.com wrote:


 On Dec 11, 2008, at 7:42 AM, Vinny wrote:

 Hello All,
 Still working on my Apache/Resin issues and looking through the docs I
 found :

 http://caucho.com/resin-3.1/doc/install-apache.xtp#Configuring%20resin.conf

 In the wild I have seen both this:

  cluster
   *srun server-id= host=127.0.0.1 port=6802/*
 /cluster

 and this:

  !-- define the servers in the cluster --
 server id= address=127.0.0.1 port=6802/

 which one is correct when using mod_caucho but not using a cluster?


 They're equivalent.  The first one is the old, Resin 3.0 syntax for
 backward compatibility.

 In Resin 3.1, every server belongs to a cluster because we want one unified
 deployment model, not a bunch of different cases.  If you have a single
 server, it belongs to a cluster with one server.  In previous versions,
 clustering was a feature, but now it's part of the architecture.

 -- Scott



 Tnanks





 The future is here. It's just not widely distributed yet.
 -William Gibson
 ___
 resin-interest mailing list
 resin-interest@caucho.com
 http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest



 ___
 resin-interest mailing list
 resin-interest@caucho.com
 http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest


___
resin-interest mailing list
resin-interest@caucho.com
http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest