Jan Kriesten wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> resin-pro-4.0.s091228
>
> the post-problem still persist with this snapshot. Once in a while the
> parameters don't get thru to the Wicket application.
>
Hmm. That snapshot should have had a fix. Thanks for the update.
-- Scott
> No exception/stacktrace for t
Hi Scott,
resin-pro-4.0.s091228
the post-problem still persist with this snapshot. Once in a while the
parameters don't get thru to the Wicket application.
No exception/stacktrace for this, I'm sorry.
I wish you a happy new year 2010 - all the best!
Best regards, --- Jan.
_
Hi Scott,
>> to keep you updated on this issue: it's still not solved with the latest
>> snapshot (Resin-Pro-4.0.s091216, Apache 2.2.14/mod_caucho)
>>
> Can you send the stack trace/error you're seeing with the latest
> snapshot? The classes and lines have changed considerably as part of the
>
Jan Kriesten wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
>
>>> sorry to have to let you know that the POST data problem still occurs
>>> randomly
>>> with our applications (http://bugs.caucho.com/view.php?id=3789).
>>> It seems that there are (also) other issues compared to 0003790.
>>>
>> Thanks for the update
Hi Scott,
>> sorry to have to let you know that the POST data problem still occurs
>> randomly
>> with our applications (http://bugs.caucho.com/view.php?id=3789).
>> It seems that there are (also) other issues compared to 0003790.
> Thanks for the update. It'll be another couple of days before we
Jan Kriesten wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> sorry to have to let you know that the POST data problem still occurs randomly
> with our applications (http://bugs.caucho.com/view.php?id=3789).
>
> It seems that there are (also) other issues compared to 0003790.
>
Thanks for the update. It'll be another co
Hi Scott,
sorry to have to let you know that the POST data problem still occurs randomly
with our applications (http://bugs.caucho.com/view.php?id=3789).
It seems that there are (also) other issues compared to 0003790.
Best regards, --- Jan.
___
From your logs, one can see that the POST request to Apache is answered
with a redirect (301) to http://localhost:889/register/ and that's why
there is a second request to the same URL with GET. That second one
makes it through Apache and gets to Resin which answers it.
So, it is Apache that is
p.HttpRequest parseHeaders Http[1]
>>>>> Accept-Charset: gb18030,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.3
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2009/12/3 Scott Ferguson :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Wesley Wu wrote:
userId=bbbeaa; managedFid=a; niceName=%u536B%u65AF%u7406; rtime=3;
>>>> ltime=1259611848411; cnzz_eid=15263584-1258525777-;
>>>> JSESSIONID=aaaYdu83foOsrfeQW7qvs
>>>> [09-12-03 06:00:43.513] {http--8080-1}
>>>> com.caucho.server.http.HttpRequest parseHeader
;> 2009/12/3 Scott Ferguson :
>>>> Wesley Wu wrote:
>>>>> Another SEVERE issues with this snapshot.
>>>>>
>>>>> All "POST" request was dramatically CHANGED to "GET" request.
>>>>>
>>>> I'm
gt;
>>>>> Jamison Novak wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> You can ignore this. After further investigation, the developer in
>>>>>> charge of the app says that it's returning a similar error under Tomcat,
>>>>>> which he claims i
recent changes
>>>> should have covered large-file posts as well, but there's always a
>>>> chance some case was missing.
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the snapshot, though. Shiny new toys are always fun...
>>>>>
>>>>>
&g
nfortunately exposed holes in the QA tests. (Of course,
>>> now we have the new tests, so there's a silver lining.)
>>>
>>> -- Scott
>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: resin-interest-boun...@caucho.com
>>>> [
; now we have the new tests, so there's a silver lining.)
>>
>> -- Scott
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: resin-interest-boun...@caucho.com
>>> [mailto:resin-interest-boun...@caucho.com] On Behalf Of Jamison Novak
>>> Sent: Wedne
tests, so there's a silver lining.)
>
> -- Scott
>> -Original Message-
>> From: resin-interest-boun...@caucho.com
>> [mailto:resin-interest-boun...@caucho.com] On Behalf Of Jamison Novak
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 2:16 PM
>> To: General Discu
nt: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 2:16 PM
> To: General Discussion for the Resin application server
> Subject: Re: [Resin-interest] new Resin 4.0 snapshot
>
> Thanks, Scott. The snapshot doesn't seem to have fixed the related error that
> we were seeing with one of our apps.
>
&
ginal Message-
From: resin-interest-boun...@caucho.com
[mailto:resin-interest-boun...@caucho.com] On Behalf Of Jamison Novak
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 2:16 PM
To: General Discussion for the Resin application server
Subject: Re: [Resin-interest] new Resin 4.0 snapshot
Thanks, Scott
t-boun...@caucho.com
[mailto:resin-interest-boun...@caucho.com] On Behalf Of Scott Ferguson
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 1:08 PM
To: resin-interest@caucho.com
Subject: [Resin-interest] new Resin 4.0 snapshot
There's a new Resin 4.0 snapshot with additional fixes fo
Thanks Scott.
This snapshot finally fix it all.
I'll have to fix it for you if you don't get this snapshot out in a week :)
-Wesley
2009/12/3 Scott Ferguson :
> There's a new Resin 4.0 snapshot with additional fixes for the
> hmux/forwarding issues.
>
> -- Scott
>
>
>
>
There's a new Resin 4.0 snapshot with additional fixes for the
hmux/forwarding issues.
-- Scott
___
resin-interest mailing list
resin-interest@caucho.com
http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest
21 matches
Mail list logo
