Re: [Resin-interest] Multi-Part request error when using HmuxRequest in Resin 4.0.2(GA)

2009-11-30 Thread Wesley Wu
Thanks Scott. I think the blocking was resolved but another exception occurred: 2009-12-01 09:24:58.789 ERROR [server--6800-6] c.b.c.s.CmsPageFilter (213) - java.lang.IllegalStateException: forward() not allowed after buffer has committed. at com.caucho.server.webapp.RequestDispatcherImp

Re: [Resin-interest] Multi-Part request error when using HmuxRequest in Resin 4.0.2(GA)

2009-11-30 Thread Scott Ferguson
Wesley Wu wrote: > Thanks, Scott. You rocks. > > We're planning a launch of a new version of my website on December 18. > > All codes in this new version rely on JSR 299 (hopefully I'll see the > final ballot today). > > So it's a bit emergency for me to solve this problem. > > I'll be happy if 4.0

Re: [Resin-interest] Multi-Part request error when using HmuxRequest in Resin 4.0.2(GA)

2009-11-30 Thread Wesley Wu
Thanks, Scott. You rocks. We're planning a launch of a new version of my website on December 18. All codes in this new version rely on JSR 299 (hopefully I'll see the final ballot today). So it's a bit emergency for me to solve this problem. I'll be happy if 4.0.3 will be ready by then, but a s

Re: [Resin-interest] Multi-Part request error when using HmuxRequest in Resin 4.0.2(GA)

2009-11-30 Thread Scott Ferguson
Scott Ferguson wrote: > Wesley Wu wrote: > >> Without this bug fixed, 4.0.2 can't be used in production environment. >> >> I use two machines with two resin as a load balance cluster, one with >> a web-tier and a app-tier the other only a app-tier. >> >> > > Can you turn on "finer" loggi

Re: [Resin-interest] Multi-Part request error when using HmuxRequest in Resin 4.0.2(GA)

2009-11-30 Thread Scott Ferguson
Wesley Wu wrote: > Without this bug fixed, 4.0.2 can't be used in production environment. > > I use two machines with two resin as a load balance cluster, one with > a web-tier and a app-tier the other only a app-tier. > Can you turn on "finer" logging for both machines and send the protocol p

Re: [Resin-interest] Multi-Part request error when using HmuxRequest in Resin 4.0.2(GA)

2009-11-30 Thread Scott Ferguson
Kai Virkki wrote: > Resin 4.x is a development version, so it's not supposed to be used in > a production environment anyway :) > The intent of 4.0.2 was to bring the quality up to be production worthy, so this is a significant issue. It looks like we'll be releasing a 4.0.3 earlier than plann

Re: [Resin-interest] Multi-Part request error when using HmuxRequest in Resin 4.0.2(GA)

2009-11-30 Thread Kai Virkki
Resin 4.x is a development version, so it's not supposed to be used in a production environment anyway :) Cheers, Kai 2009/11/30 Wesley Wu : > Without this bug fixed, 4.0.2 can't be used in production environment. > > I use two machines with two resin as a load balance cluster, one with > a web-

Re: [Resin-interest] Multi-Part request error when using HmuxRequest in Resin 4.0.2(GA)

2009-11-30 Thread Wesley Wu
Without this bug fixed, 4.0.2 can't be used in production environment. I use two machines with two resin as a load balance cluster, one with a web-tier and a app-tier the other only a app-tier. Every file upload block it. 2009/11/30 Wesley Wu > > This bug should be marked as "block" because it

Re: [Resin-interest] Multi-Part request error when using HmuxRequest in Resin 4.0.2(GA)

2009-11-29 Thread Wesley Wu
This bug should be marked as "block" because it prevents resin load-balancer and third-party web server integration from working properly. It seems caucho QA team did not pay much attention to Hmux stuff, because I suffered a lot from it... -Wesley 2009/11/29 Alex > > Multi-Part request error

Re: [Resin-interest] Multi-Part request error when using HmuxRequest in Resin 4.0.2(GA)

2009-11-28 Thread Alex
> Multi-Part request error when using HmuxRequest. Thanks Wesley, I reported a bug: http://bugs.caucho.com/view.php?id=3790 Alex > > My resin 4.0.2 was behind an apache 2.1.x using CauchoRequest to forward all > request for a virtual host to resin. > > If I use 8080 port without apache, ever