Re: [Resin-interest] Resin Pro licencing and support
With the pro license, you get better performance from both resin and quercus. Bill On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Rob Lockstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We have a 100 Server Pro license and are very happy with it. > > Back in the day, there was no "Pro" version (as I recall). But as > Resin has matured, having the Pro version has become more important if > you're going to be using Resin in a production environment, or even if > you just want to become familiar with the capabilities/features of the > Pro version for future use. > > I agree, if you can afford to license Pro, it's definitely good to > support further development. As you can tell, Resin is, and has been > for years, frequently updated with bug fixes and new features, so you > wouldn't be investing in a product that languishes for months or years > with no new releases. > > Rob > > On Sep 4, 2008, at 08:29, Heimo Laukkanen wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I have to say that I'm extremely impressed with my tests with resin > > and quercus - and have started to wonder, whether licencing the pro > > version would actually be worth it - if nothing else, then just to > > support the development :-D > > > > What is the general feeling among people using Resin: do you use pro > > version or manage with open source versions? Have you been happy with > > the nromal support , or have you invested in priority support? > > > > I've previosly been using mostly Sun Glassfish, but Resin has some > > neat features and small footprint to be very interesting tool to be > > used. My main interest though for Resin is Quercus - the ability to > > use php-frontend with existing skillsets from contractors, and build > > robust Java-backend. And eventhough Quercus can be used in other > > appservers too, the fact that it would be supported and tested on > > resin weights a lot. > > > > -huima > > > > > > ___ > resin-interest mailing list > resin-interest@caucho.com > http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest > ___ resin-interest mailing list resin-interest@caucho.com http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest
Re: [Resin-interest] Resin Pro licencing and support
We have a 100 Server Pro license and are very happy with it. Back in the day, there was no "Pro" version (as I recall). But as Resin has matured, having the Pro version has become more important if you're going to be using Resin in a production environment, or even if you just want to become familiar with the capabilities/features of the Pro version for future use. I agree, if you can afford to license Pro, it's definitely good to support further development. As you can tell, Resin is, and has been for years, frequently updated with bug fixes and new features, so you wouldn't be investing in a product that languishes for months or years with no new releases. Rob On Sep 4, 2008, at 08:29, Heimo Laukkanen wrote: > Hi all, > > I have to say that I'm extremely impressed with my tests with resin > and quercus - and have started to wonder, whether licencing the pro > version would actually be worth it - if nothing else, then just to > support the development :-D > > What is the general feeling among people using Resin: do you use pro > version or manage with open source versions? Have you been happy with > the nromal support , or have you invested in priority support? > > I've previosly been using mostly Sun Glassfish, but Resin has some > neat features and small footprint to be very interesting tool to be > used. My main interest though for Resin is Quercus - the ability to > use php-frontend with existing skillsets from contractors, and build > robust Java-backend. And eventhough Quercus can be used in other > appservers too, the fact that it would be supported and tested on > resin weights a lot. > > -huima > ___ resin-interest mailing list resin-interest@caucho.com http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest
Re: [Resin-interest] Resin Pro licencing and support
Heimo, We have been using the pro version of Resin since 2000 for the Go2marine Web site. I highly recommend it. The performance is excellent. I also can't say enough praise for the Caucho development/support team. Keith Heimo Laukkanen wrote: > Hi all, > > I have to say that I'm extremely impressed with my tests with resin > and quercus - and have started to wonder, whether licencing the pro > version would actually be worth it - if nothing else, then just to > support the development :-D > > What is the general feeling among people using Resin: do you use pro > version or manage with open source versions? Have you been happy with > the nromal support , or have you invested in priority support? > > I've previosly been using mostly Sun Glassfish, but Resin has some > neat features and small footprint to be very interesting tool to be > used. My main interest though for Resin is Quercus - the ability to > use php-frontend with existing skillsets from contractors, and build > robust Java-backend. And eventhough Quercus can be used in other > appservers too, the fact that it would be supported and tested on > resin weights a lot. > > -huima > > > ___ > resin-interest mailing list > resin-interest@caucho.com > http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest -- - Keith Fetterman206-780-5670 Mariner Supply, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.go2marine.com http://www.shoprvparts.com http://www.boatersline.com ___ resin-interest mailing list resin-interest@caucho.com http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest
Re: [Resin-interest] Resin Pro licencing and support
The pro version runs quicker thanks to jni I think... I use pro version only. (I also like to support dev team !) Heimo Laukkanen wrote: > Hi all, > > I have to say that I'm extremely impressed with my tests with resin > and quercus - and have started to wonder, whether licencing the pro > version would actually be worth it - if nothing else, then just to > support the development :-D > > What is the general feeling among people using Resin: do you use pro > version or manage with open source versions? Have you been happy with > the nromal support , or have you invested in priority support? > > I've previosly been using mostly Sun Glassfish, but Resin has some > neat features and small footprint to be very interesting tool to be > used. My main interest though for Resin is Quercus - the ability to > use php-frontend with existing skillsets from contractors, and build > robust Java-backend. And eventhough Quercus can be used in other > appservers too, the fact that it would be supported and tested on > resin weights a lot. > > -huima > > > ___ > resin-interest mailing list > resin-interest@caucho.com > http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest > > -- Riccardo Cohen Architecte du Logiciel http://www.architectedulogiciel.fr +33 (0)6.09.83.64.49 ___ resin-interest mailing list resin-interest@caucho.com http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest
