Re: [Resteasy-users] RESTEasy and netty

2013-08-28 Thread Jan Algermissen
On 28.08.2013, at 23:46, Bill Burke wrote: > JAX-RS is a stream, BIO, framework , so it is still using java.io.*. > Can't get around this. Doh - sure. Well, 3.0 then :-) > Its a buffer exchange between Netty and > Resteasy. Kristoffer just implemented Netty 4 support. He also > impleme

Re: [Resteasy-users] RESTEasy and netty

2013-08-28 Thread Bill Burke
JAX-RS is a stream, BIO, framework , so it is still using java.io.*. Can't get around this. Its a buffer exchange between Netty and Resteasy. Kristoffer just implemented Netty 4 support. He also implemented support for JAX-RS 2.0 async APIs too. The problem is though, even with those async

[Resteasy-users] RESTEasy and netty

2013-08-28 Thread Jan Algermissen
Hi all, Bill, I saw you integrated RESTEasy and netty[1]. Can you point me to details how directly RESTEasy sits on top of netty? Is the integration just to enable use of netty as the container or si RESTEasy actually taking advantage of the async approach? I am only about to dive into netty