Hello all,
I run a nightly backup using Retrospect 5.11 on a Win2k Server machine
(member server only). I backup a mixed (Mac and Win) bunch of clients.
Generally backups are going good (no major errors), yet I get sometime
error 1017 - insufficient permissions on some of the Mac files. Nothing
OK, the Hardware Compatibility List says "All HP DAT Drives" for both
Mac and Windows, but THEN goes on to enumerate a bunch of HP DAT
Drives.
Is it safe to still say "any HP DAT Drive", or is it just the
enumerated HP DAT Drives that are acceptable?
Secondly, is anyone using Retrospect to
Couldn't you, in theory, just share out "/" as an appletalk/smb share
(platform-dependent), and tell Retrospect to back up that network
share?
Then, in theory, if you had to restore it, you reinstall, share it
out and let it dump it back out on the share. The only potential
problem I could
Being that OS X has a rather incestuous relationship with NetBSD, and
that Dantz is publicly working on OS X support, 'tis but a small step to
NBSD and OBSD... One would hope such a step would take place, to be sure...
Regards,
Ed Hintz
Geek Guy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
From: "Derek
At 01:38 PM 8/9/2000, you wrote:
At 12:42 PM -0700 8/9/00, Doug Clements wrote:
What don't you like about my way of creating a tar file on a mounted NT
share? It seems to work rather well, and makes for an easy recovery.
I recognize that it'll work great, I just prefer not to have to do the
Title: RE: Newcomer Questions
I'd probably go DDS-4, then buy a second DDS-4 unit when needed, as you add more clients. Retro intelligently uses chained tape drives, writing to one, then the other. Use an incremental backup process.
Recent previous Retro talks had discussions of relative
