Re: Stubbornly Invisible Client!

2000-07-28 Thread Glenn L. Austin
on 7/28/00 8:15 AM, Gowan Fenley at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually, this is the latest route suggested by Matt. I am reluctant to take such extreme measures as blowing away an entire subnet so far. That sort of work would have to be after hours, and this, after all an evaluation of

Re: Scripting within Retrospect.

2000-07-28 Thread Matthew Tevenan
The AppleShare lockout feature only works when Retrospect is running on the AppleShare server. It will not lock out users when backing up AppleShare servers remotely. Regards, Matthew Tevenan Technical Support Specialist Dantz Development Corporation 925.253.3050 [EMAIL PROTECTED] From:

Re: Stubbornly Invisible Client!

2000-07-28 Thread Eric Ullman
Gowan Fenley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The "Macintosh centric" feel of the product has begun to concern me. While I certainly have no bias against Apple (we were once an Apple shop before moving to NT), I hope Dantz is not struggling with a lack of depth of experience with NT/Win2K as

Re: Stubbornly Invisible Client!

2000-07-28 Thread Matthew Tevenan
Gowan, You might want to go over the "bindlistener" registry edit again to make sure you've done it correctly: Stop the Client service from the Services control panel. From the Start menu, choose Run and type "Regedit" (no quotes). Open the path HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Dantz\Retrospect

Stubbornly Invisible Client REVEALED!!!

2000-07-28 Thread Gowan Fenley
BINGO! Matt had the answer - change the binding order of the NICs and *poof* the misbehaving client is now visible to the backup server! I overlooked checking that setting simply because Microsoft moved the binding tab to such a screwy place in Win2K (you really have to root for it,

RE: Is Dantz Wintel competent?

2000-07-28 Thread Gowan Fenley
In response to my rhetorical query, Eric said: ...The architecture of Retrospect for Windows is NOT a port of the Mac product; it has been completely redesigned from the ground up...What would a "defined Wintel heritage" have given us?... Point taken. I definitely agree that Incremental-Plus is

RE: Stubbornly Invisible Client!

2000-07-28 Thread Paul Mackinney
Hi, As one of the senior QA people here at Dantz, I've been asked to reply to this post. Hopefully I can cover most of the issues involved. First, I have to thank Gowan for that last post. I appreciate its pragmatic approach. My intention with this post is to address Gowan's questions, and to

Re: G3/Sony DAT

2000-07-28 Thread Jim Grisham
Ken, I believe that our G3 Server(MT) has a Sony DAT drive, with Apple supplied bezel. Jim System Administrator Illini Media Company Student Media at the University of Illinois [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ken Gillett said, in a previous message: I'd like to put a Sony ???9000 (DDS3) DAT in a beige