Gardner
Reply To: retro-talk
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 3:56 PM
To: retro-talk
Subject: Re: CPU speed vs. Network speed?
on 8/16/2000 11:22 AM, Harry Mueller at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would give better performance, a G3 upgrade to the 6100 or a 100
base T
The 6100 has notorious problems with its built-in ethernet, so a 100-baseT
card is the way to go.
- Original Message -
From: "Harry Mueller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "retro-talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 12:22 PM
Subject: CPU speed vs. Network speed?
Greetings,
Harry Mueller wrote:
Greetings,
I just got off the telephone with a client who was asking me
to upgrade their backup system. They are currently using retrospect
4.3 on a Mac IIsi via 10BT on a switched 10/100 ethernet (client 10,
servers 100)to their DDS3 tape drive. It seems
Greetings,
I just got off the telephone with a client who was asking me
to upgrade their backup system. They are currently using retrospect
4.3 on a Mac IIsi via 10BT on a switched 10/100 ethernet (client 10,
servers 100)to their DDS3 tape drive. It seems that the IIsi is
dying rather
What would give better performance, a G3 upgrade to the 6100 or a 100
base T card. I can only do one since the 6100 only has one slot.
A 100 base T card in a NuBus adapter on a 6100 will only go about 4
times as fast as the 10baseT connection. The drivers, the bus, and the
6100 just aren't
