The "Macintosh centric" feel of the product has begun to concern me. While I
certainly have no bias against Apple (we were once an Apple shop before
moving to NT), I hope Dantz is not struggling with a lack of depth of
experience with NT/Win2K as compared to other vendors with a more well
defined
on 7/28/00 8:15 AM, Gowan Fenley at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, this is the latest route suggested by Matt. I am reluctant to take
such extreme measures as blowing away an entire subnet so far. That sort of
work would have to be after hours, and this, after all an evaluation of
Gowan Fenley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The "Macintosh centric" feel of the product has begun to concern me. While I
certainly have no bias against Apple (we were once an Apple shop before
moving to NT), I hope Dantz is not struggling with a lack of depth of
experience with NT/Win2K as
computer.
Regards,
Matthew Tevenan
Technical Support Specialist
Dantz Development Corporation
925.253.3050
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "Gowan Fenley" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: "retro-talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 11:15:15 -0400
To: "retro-talk"
Hi,
As one of the senior QA people here at Dantz, I've been asked to reply to
this post. Hopefully I can cover most of the issues involved.
First, I have to thank Gowan for that last post. I appreciate its pragmatic
approach. My intention with this post is to address Gowan's questions, and
to
