cobalt

2000-03-07 Thread jakob krabbe



I haven't really been following the thread in a long time... But i did
notice retrospect client is not valible for Unix (Linux) plattform.

Are there anyone out there using the cool Cobalt servers? I have looked
into the NASRaQ, Network Area Storage, in a rack format, to use as a
fileserver in a mac + pc shared network.

I think it's a shame Apple doesn't supply us with servers in standard 19"
rack format... I mean, we don't have alot of space at the office but we
could get ten of these Cobalts and they take up hardley no space at all but
still do the work!

I've also looked at a PC solution (Dell, PowerEdge rack format) and a Mac
solution (G4).


http://www.cobalt.com/products/nas/index.html

---

When it comes to back-up, can we sync these with the rest of the clients
that are using Retrospect. In a PC / Mac solution I know there would be no
problem using our existing backup server...

There is a SCSI socket at the back on the Cobalts...

thanx for any input or advice,

/ jakob



--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: cobalt

2000-03-07 Thread jakob krabbe


This is slightley OT but I'm not the one to judge. In respect to this list
and if listmom want us to, we'll go private.

---

   You bet, I have an installed base numbering in the 40s. They 
work really well and even though there is no Retrospect Client (yet) 
I have been able to back them up by mounting the directories on the 
backup server and backing them up from there.

After sending my first mail this came to my thought. The most important for
me if is our network WORKS not if the backup takes three or six hours.

Mounting the volumes at start seemed like a working solution.

---

In case of a failiour, how does these (Cobalt) machines REALLY work? I
mean, is it easy to remove / change / upgrade the harddrives? Just in case
of the expecting(?) diskcrash... ;-) Same with RAM.

Crashing drives... that's my worst fear. On the mac and pc I know how to
deal with it... sort of... but on a closed unix server with no screen...!?

Crashes aren't *that* common, it's just when they come they truely stink!

What about your 40 servers, have you had any failing drives?

thanx,

/ jakob


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: cobalt

2000-03-07 Thread Luke Jaeger

Marathon Computer, http://www.powerrack.com/

Harry Mueller wrote:
 
 
 There are a few companies that do conversions of desktop
 servers into rack mounted servers. I saw one that will convert an
 iMac into a 1u rackmountable case. I wish I could remember the name
 because I would think about buying a few.
 
 --Harry

-- 


top of the world,

Luke Jaeger, Technology Coordinator
Disney Magazine Publishing
Northampton, Massachusetts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Any opinions expressed in this message are my own and may not represent
the opinions of Disney Publishing, etc etc etc.

*


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: cobalt

2000-03-07 Thread Owen Watson

I asked our ISP about them, and he said he'd tested them and didn't 
do very well under load. I think he used a load of the thin Sun 
rackmounts in the end.


Are there anyone out there using the cool Cobalt servers? I have looked
into the NASRaQ, Network Area Storage, in a rack format, to use as a
fileserver in a mac + pc shared network.

.
Owen Watson
at home in Wellington, New Zealand


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: cobalt

2000-03-07 Thread Harry Mueller

At 7:27 AM +1300 3/8/00, Owen Watson wrote:

I asked our ISP about them, and he said he'd tested them and didn't 
do very well under load. I think he used a load of the thin Sun 
rackmounts in the end.

Generally you are looking at configuration or network traffic 
problems when they perform poorly. I'm willing to accept that there 
are better rack mounted web servers out there. However, as a network 
storage I have found that the NASRaQ can't be beat.

--Harry
-- 
--
Harry Mueller
MaxSolutions, LLC
708 Little City Road
Higganum, CT 06441-4246
USA

860-345-9986
860-345-9136 (fax)

http://www.maxsolns.com


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]