Re: Retrospect Server Backup for Linux?

2000-07-05 Thread Xavier HUMBERT - Labo Informatique
Le 04/07/2000 a 00:00 -0700 , Seth D. Mattinen ecrivait : > As it stands now, I need to run two parallel backups, and have yet to >find > anything as nice as Retrospect for Linux. I trust Retrospect, I don't >trust > tar or dump as much. =) In the meantime, you can run Amanda (http://www.amanda.

Re: Backing up NT Servers

2000-07-05 Thread Xavier HUMBERT - Labo Informatique
Le 04/07/2000 a 22:00 +1200 , Owen Watson ecrivait : > What do we have to do to back up all the rest of the stuff on a NT >server (onto a Mac) such as the Registry info that isn't covered by >Client backup? Bundled with the client, there's a small utility that Backups the registry to a regular f

Re: Retrospect Server Backup for Linux?

2000-07-05 Thread Chris Freemesser
>On 2000-07-03 17:49 +0200, "Andre Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> This may be an out off topic question, but I have used Retrospect for >> years in network environments and have switched recently to a Linux >> based file server. As far as I can see, there is no available product on >>

Re: Backing up NT Servers

2000-07-05 Thread Eric Ullman
Owen Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Exchange backup utility is great! Thanks! > What do we have to do to back up all the rest of the stuff on a NT > server (onto a Mac) such as the Registry info that isn't covered by > Client backup? Use Retrospect Backup for Windows. The Mac version

Re: Backing up NT Servers

2000-07-05 Thread Philip Chonacky
Are there any plans to upate the Mac version to include the items currently not included like NTFS permissions? ( ) Yes ( ) No ( ) Can't comment at this time. ( ) ??? Thanks in advance. -Philip Chonacky >Owen Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The Exchange backup utility is great! > >Than

Re: Backing up NT Servers

2000-07-05 Thread Eric Ullman
> Are there any plans to upate the Mac version to include the items currently > not included like NTFS permissions? (X) Yes ( ) No ( ) Can't comment at this time. ( ) ??? The architecture of Retrospect for Windows is more technically advanced than the Mac version. Adding support for things like n

Re: Backing up NT Servers

2000-07-05 Thread Ken Gillett
At 8:24 AM -0700 5/7/00, Eric Ullman wrote: >The architecture of Retrospect for Windows is more technically advanced than >the Mac version. Adding support for things like new file systems is easier >for us to implement with the new architecture. It makes sense for us to move >this new design to th

wrong time for autolaunched backup

2000-07-05 Thread Paul Harms
I currently use Retrospect 4.2 on a separate Mac to Backup our two fileservers at work. So far it has been very trouble-free, however on two instances in the past week the backup scripts failed to autolaunch properly. Instead of starting at 11PM they started around 8:30AM the following day. Th