Re: AIT drives

2000-03-09 Thread jakob krabbe
AIT = Advanced Intelligent Tape. 1. I belive this have been discussed before, but please correct me if I'm wrong when I say Retrospect doesn't take advantage of the chiptechnology inside those tapes. 2. Would it be wise (possible??) to cycle those tapes in six or eight week periods? (We have

Re: AIT drives

2000-03-09 Thread Erik Ableson
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 03:24:17PM +0100, jakob krabbe wrote: AIT = Advanced Intelligent Tape. 1. I belive this have been discussed before, but please correct me if I'm wrong when I say Retrospect doesn't take advantage of the chiptechnology inside those tapes. Currently Retrospect does

Re: AIT drives

2000-03-09 Thread Ted Baker
Does anyone have any experience with the LaCie AIT 35 GB/70 GB drives? I've been using an APS 35/70 AIT drive for ~5 months now on a biege desktop 266MHz G3 running MacOS 9 Retrospect 4.1 (now 4.2) to do nightly backups on 24 disks on 12 Macs 2 PC's with zero problems from the tape drive. At

Re: AIT drives

2000-03-08 Thread Erik Ableson
Yup - we use lots of AITs - not the LaCie ones specifically, but since it's just the SONY mechanism in a LaCIE case it should be representative. Currently we're using the 25/50 tapes but there's very little difference in the new ones. We have over 4,000 AIT tapes in current use over the