Hello All,
I have facing problem in uploading the clearcase diff in review
request using post-review script.
command used: cleartool lsco -cview -me -recurse -short | sed s//
\//g | xargs post-review -d --diff-only --target-people=chetan.d --
summary=test2_by_chetan --description
Hi Folks
I have several questions about the Web api which is used for create a new
review request:
1. As described in
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/webapi/reference/apicalls/new-review-request/,
if this API run successfully, then what is the return type? I see it's a so
called
Is there a way to reset the login cookie that is used with post-review?
Kyle Hayes
Sr. Web Developer | Disney Family
Disney Interactive Media Group
818-623-3847
AIM/YIM/gTalk: mrkylehayes
It's kind of fun to do the impossible. -Walt Disney
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today
Nevermind, I forgot it was just a file in the directory.
Kyle Hayes
Sr. Web Developer | Disney Family
Disney Interactive Media Group
818-623-3847
AIM/YIM/gTalk: mrkylehayes
It's kind of fun to do the impossible. -Walt Disney
On Jul 15, 2010, at 10:51 AM, Hayes, Kyle wrote:
Is there a way to
Hmm, I can't tell if the groups web interface ate my message or if I
just need mod approval before it shows up so I'll try again. Sorry if
this shows up twice.
change-3 and change-2 *are* branches, just with a single commit each.
Sorry I didn't make that clear (note the presence of refs/heads/
Sorry I wasn't clear: change-3 and change-2 *are* branches, with a
single commit each (hence the refs/heads/change-3 in the log). It
would be ideal if they didn't have to be, but it's an easy workaround
so I'll take whatever I can get.
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
Hi,
Yes, that'll return a JSON object. On success, 'stat' will be 'ok' and it
will contain a 'review_request' key. On failure, 'stat' will be 'fail' and
information will be in 'err'.
If the request was successful, and was made from the same user you're using
for the web UI, you should see it in
Hi,
I am Aleix Pol, from the KDE project. I'm working on a little plugin
for KDevelop that will enable the user to send patches directly a
reviewboard service.
I've been testing the API using curl and there I can create a new
review but when I try to add a patch I get an HTML error saying that
Hi Aleix,
Off-hand, I don't know why it'd be problematic, but I'd recommend setting up
a little development server on your box, set DEBUG = True in your
settings_local.py, and testing it there. We should be able to better see
what the error is that way, along with lots of debug information.
We
You can't yet. It's one of the things I'm working on before 1.5.
What you can do though is browse /api/ (I recommend the JSONView FireFox
extension for this), and look at reviewboard/webapi/resources.py.
The new API is pretty browseable. Not everything, but it's getting there.
You can also look
Well I could make it work.
Just for the record, the correct line was this:
curl http://reviewboard.kde.org/api/json/reviewrequests/4647/diff/new/ -u
apol -F basedir=/trunk/KDE/kdeedu/kalgebra -F pa...@cosa | json_reformat
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Christian Hammond
Updates:
Status: NotABug
Comment #1 on issue 1726 by trowbrds: Question regarding usage of
ReviewBoard for review of arbitrary files
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1726
Looks like you found the right place to ask this.
--
You received this message because you
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1727 by xrevolver: post-review wrongly detects client class if
few source control tools installed on server (e.g mercurial and clearcase)
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1727
*NOTE: Do not post
Comment #12 on issue 46 by bernard3000: 80-column indicator in diff view
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=46
If it is decided that this should be a user-level setting, why not cache
the content with that setting as part of the cache key? So yes, that means
a bigger
14 matches
Mail list logo
