Chirs,
The old install was done by someone else.
I see the folders created on 4th Aug, 2008.
I am not sure whether rb-site was used or not.
Do I need to perform commands like /.manage.py evolve after rb-site
upgrade?
At this point I am really stuck...!!
On Oct 28, 2:38 pm, Kunjal
I found the Version of the Reviewboard we have.
/* Define to the address where bug reports for this package should be
sent. */
#define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/
entry
/* Define to the full name of this package. */
#define PACKAGE_NAME Review Board
/* Define
Chirs,
Sorry for all this email but I found this.
In the older installation, there are few dir. which are not present in
1.0.3 installation.
Did I miss installing something?
The dir. I do not see in RB 1.0.3 installation are:
djblets
iphone
m3
The files I do not see in RB 1.0.3 instllation
Wow, this is ancient. Definitely pre-rb-site.
Okay, so you'll need to do the following:
1) Copy over the database.
2) Go through the rb-site install process for the new site, creating a brand
new site directory. Specify the existing database information during the
process.
3) Run rb-site upgrade
Yeah, those files were removed long ago. Much has changed since that
version. That was essentially a pre-alpha.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Kunjal
Did you then run rb-site upgrade on it? It should have taken care of that.
What version were you upgrading from? I thought 1.0 had this field.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Wed, Oct 28,
To add more info..we have never done any upgrade.
We install Reviewboard Beta in 2008 and still using the old Beta
version.
Is there a way or we need to start with new database with our RB 1.0.3
release?
-Kunjal
On Oct 28, 2:30 pm, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote:
We are upgrading from
It is mysql database and we tar it on one server and untar it on the
server where RB1.0.3 installed.
Is there any better way to copy over?
On Oct 27, 3:41 pm, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Chris,
I have installed RB 1.0.3 on VM.
I wanted that RB 1.0.3 release should have
Is there a proper way to do it?
I did like this.
mysqldump --user=root -p --all-databases --socket=/var/lib/mysql/
mysql.sock backup-reviewboard.sql
On Oct 27, 3:41 pm, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Chris,
I have installed RB 1.0.3 on VM.
I wanted that RB 1.0.3 release
Should work in theory.
Are you re-using the same settings_local.py and other contents of the site
directory?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Kunjal
Very good point.
We have settings_local.py in our prod. server but I did not port it
over.
I already have settings.py in my new RB1.0.3 installation.
What is the difference between settings_local.py and settings.py and
do I need both?
Should I port the settings_local.py and do the rb-site
Thanks.
I really like your quick support.
All the thanks to your team. I will try it out after porting
settings_local.py file.
Regards,
Kunjal
On Oct 27, 4:18 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
You shouldn't care about settings.py, as that's part of the Review Board
source.
12 matches
Mail list logo
