Re: rbt patch "file not found"

2016-09-23 Thread Daniel Kuecker 
Perforce repo and the diff was generated with and older version of RBTools
(post-review era.).

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:06 AM Christian Hammond 
wrote:

> What type of repository is this, and how was the diff generated/uploaded?
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond
> President/CEO of Beanbag 
> Makers of Review Board 
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Daniel Kuecker 
> wrote:
>
>> Oops, forgot to mention I am running this on Windows 10.
>>
>> RBTools:  0.7.6
>> RB: tried on versions 1.7.27 and 2.5.6.1
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, September 22, 2016 at 8:50:04 AM UTC-5, Daniel Kuecker wrote:
>>>
>>> Running "rbt patch " command results in a file not found
>>> error for every file in the request.  I verified the files are synced to my
>>> local drive.  Any ideas?
>>>
>>> Command line info (path info removed for anonymity):
>>> C:\P4>rbt patch 127325
>>> Patch is being applied from request 127325 with diff revision 1.
>>> Failed to execute command: [u'patch', u'-i',
>>> u'c:\\users\\***\\appdata\\local\\temp\\tmpjq4zbu']
>>> can't find file to patch at input line 3
>>> Perhaps you should have used the -p or --strip option?
>>> The text leading up to this was:
>>> --
>>> |---
>>> ///***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_common_impl_details.rb
>>>
>>> ///***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_common_impl_details.rb#6
>>> |+++
>>> ///***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_common_impl_details.rb
>>>   2016-02-18 09:21:42
>>> --
>>> File to patch:
>>> Skip this patch? [y]
>>> Skipping patch.
>>> 1 out of 1 hunk ignored
>>> missing header for unified diff at line 17 of patch
>>> can't find file to patch at input line 17
>>> Perhaps you should have used the -p or --strip option?
>>> The text leading up to this was:
>>> --
>>> |/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_setup_common_impl_details.rb
>>>
>>> ///***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_setup_common_impl_details.rb#2
>>> |+++
>>> ///***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_setup_common_impl_details.rb
>>> 2016-02-18 09:21:43
>>> --
>>> File to patch:
>>> Skip this patch? [y]
>>> Skipping patch.
>>> 1 out of 1 hunk ignored
>>> missing header for unified diff at line 27 of patch
>>> can't find file to patch at input line 27
>>> Perhaps you should have used the -p or --strip option?
>>> The text leading up to this was:
>>> --
>>> |/***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_setup_impl_details.rb
>>>
>>>  
>>> ///***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_setup_impl_details.rb#2
>>> |+++
>>> ///***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_setup_impl_details.rb
>>>2016-02-18 09:21:43
>>> --
>>> File to patch:
>>> Skip this patch? [y]
>>> Skipping patch.
>>> 1 out of 1 hunk ignored
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
>> https://rbcommons.com/
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: How to access the review board site from other system via browser?

2016-09-23 Thread P P Gobind Chandra Praharaj 
After copying and giving the ln command, I am able to access the review 
board site.. Thank you

On Friday, September 23, 2016 at 12:44:48 AM UTC+5:30, Daniel Kuecker wrote:
>
> Are you getting an error?
>
> Did you copy your apache-wsgi.conf to /etc/httpd/conf.d/?
>
> If you did that, you might need to enable httpd port passthru in the 
> firewall.
>
> On Thursday, September 22, 2016 at 9:19:22 AM UTC-5, P P Gobind Chandra 
> Praharaj wrote:
>>
>> I have set-up all prerequisites and all the installation required for 
>> local reviewboard along with rb-site, server is apache httpd with mod_wsi. 
>>
>>
>> Can any one help me on how to access the review bpoard which I have 
>> installed locally from different systems via web browser.
>>
>>
>> Below are the steps detailed:
>>
>>
>>
>>1. yum -y install zlib zlib-devel 
>>2. yum -y install openssl-devel 
>>3. yum -y install memcached 
>>4. yum -y install python-devel
>>5.  yum -y install python-setuptools 
>>6. yum -y install patch easy_install
>>7.  mysql-python yum -y install git-core
>>8. easy_install ReviewBoard 
>>9. *rb-site install /var/www/ReviewBoard*
>>
>>
>> *Steps followed during Installing rb-site*
>>
>>
>>-  Domain name localhost:80
>>-  Root Path : reviews
>>- And other configurations are default.
>>
>>
>> All steps are executed successfully.
>>
>>
>> But I do not know how can I access the review board over browser.
>>
>> Please help me?
>>
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Building RBTools 0.7.6 into a single-file exe for Windows

2016-09-23 Thread Daniel Kuecker 
Any pointers?

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:54 PM, john levin  wrote:

> I did.. and i was successful..
>
> On Sep 23, 2016 12:30 AM, "Daniel Kuecker"  wrote:
>
>> Has anyone been successful building RBTools 0.7.6 into a single-file exe
>> for distribution on windows?
>>
>> I'm trying to wrap rbt post functionality into an exe file and both
>> py2exe and pyinstaller built exes are having issues when pkg_resources
>> tries to resolve the rbtools package.
>>
>> The exe builds fine, but when I run it, I get a
>> "pkg_resources.distributionnotfound: the 'rbtools' distribution was not
>> found and is required by the application" error.
>>
>> I've tried listing rbtools as hidden imports and importing an egg
>> (although the egg import was never successful), to no avail.
>>
>> Thanks in advance!
>>
>> --Daniel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
>> https://rbcommons.com/
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Building RBTools 0.7.6 into a single-file exe for Windows

2016-09-23 Thread Christian Hammond 
Sorry, I don't have any pointers here. Tools like py2exe drastically
changes the way Python projects execute, which can end up causing a large
number of tricky to diagnose issues. Having done a lot of
py2exe/pyinstaller work in the past, it's not a route I'd want to go again.

While I'd accept reasonable patches for things RBTools is doing, it's
important to note that some things simply will not work, and those are
things we must ship with. Examples would be any commands that reference a
shipped data file, or otherwise need to deal with something relative to a
module path.

I understand the desire to have a single .exe you can drop on development
machines, but am not sold on this being the way to go. What a lot of
companies do is have a single shared install of RBTools in some common
directory on a file server, and have that directory added to the path. Some
use a wrapper script to set the PYTHON_PATH and such for that. This gives
you central management of RBTools, usage of the RBTools API, and wouldn't
require the kinds of work that would be needed to get things in shape for
tools like py2exe to work.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond
President/CEO of Beanbag 
Makers of Review Board 

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Daniel Kuecker  wrote:

> Any pointers?
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:54 PM, john levin 
> wrote:
>
>> I did.. and i was successful..
>>
>> On Sep 23, 2016 12:30 AM, "Daniel Kuecker"  wrote:
>>
>>> Has anyone been successful building RBTools 0.7.6 into a single-file exe
>>> for distribution on windows?
>>>
>>> I'm trying to wrap rbt post functionality into an exe file and both
>>> py2exe and pyinstaller built exes are having issues when pkg_resources
>>> tries to resolve the rbtools package.
>>>
>>> The exe builds fine, but when I run it, I get a
>>> "pkg_resources.distributionnotfound: the 'rbtools' distribution was not
>>> found and is required by the application" error.
>>>
>>> I've tried listing rbtools as hidden imports and importing an egg
>>> (although the egg import was never successful), to no avail.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>
>>> --Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
>>> https://rbcommons.com/
>>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "reviewboard" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>> --
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
>> https://rbcommons.com/
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: rbt patch "file not found"

2016-09-23 Thread Christian Hammond 
rbt patch hasn't had much work done for Perforce. It should work, but it
doesn't map Perforce depot paths to local file paths. You may need to
figure out what -p parameter you need to use (in order to strip the leading
part of the depot path).

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond
President/CEO of Beanbag 
Makers of Review Board 

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:22 AM, Daniel Kuecker  wrote:

> Perforce repo and the diff was generated with and older version of RBTools
> (post-review era.).
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:06 AM Christian Hammond <
> christ...@beanbaginc.com> wrote:
>
>> What type of repository is this, and how was the diff generated/uploaded?
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> --
>> Christian Hammond
>> President/CEO of Beanbag 
>> Makers of Review Board 
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Daniel Kuecker 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Oops, forgot to mention I am running this on Windows 10.
>>>
>>> RBTools:  0.7.6
>>> RB: tried on versions 1.7.27 and 2.5.6.1
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday, September 22, 2016 at 8:50:04 AM UTC-5, Daniel Kuecker
>>> wrote:

 Running "rbt patch " command results in a file not found
 error for every file in the request.  I verified the files are synced to my
 local drive.  Any ideas?

 Command line info (path info removed for anonymity):
 C:\P4>rbt patch 127325
 Patch is being applied from request 127325 with diff revision 1.
 Failed to execute command: [u'patch', u'-i',
 u'c:\\users\\***\\appdata\\local\\temp\\tmpjq4zbu']
 can't find file to patch at input line 3
 Perhaps you should have used the -p or --strip option?
 The text leading up to this was:
 --
 |--- 
 ///***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_common_impl_details.rb
   ///***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_
 common_impl_details.rb#6
 |+++ 
 ///***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_common_impl_details.rb
   2016-02-18 09:21:42
 --
 File to patch:
 Skip this patch? [y]
 Skipping patch.
 1 out of 1 hunk ignored
 missing header for unified diff at line 17 of patch
 can't find file to patch at input line 17
 Perhaps you should have used the -p or --strip option?
 The text leading up to this was:
 --
 |/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_setup_common_impl_details.rb
   ///***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_
 setup_common_impl_details.rb#2
 |+++ 
 ///***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_setup_common_impl_details.rb
 2016-02-18 09:21:43
 --
 File to patch:
 Skip this patch? [y]
 Skipping patch.
 1 out of 1 hunk ignored
 missing header for unified diff at line 27 of patch
 can't find file to patch at input line 27
 Perhaps you should have used the -p or --strip option?
 The text leading up to this was:
 --
 |/***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_setup_impl_details.rb
  ///***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source/
 /_setup_impl_details.rb#2
 |+++ 
 ///***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_setup_impl_details.rb
2016-02-18 09:21:43
 --
 File to patch:
 Skip this patch? [y]
 Skipping patch.
 1 out of 1 hunk ignored


 --
>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
>>> https://rbcommons.com/
>>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "reviewboard" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
>> https://rbcommons.com/
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You

Re: Building RBTools 0.7.6 into a single-file exe for Windows

2016-09-23 Thread Daniel Kuecker 
Hey Christian,

Our clients would rather not install an app on their development machines.
We have been using an older version of RBTools, that we made a custom
post-review for, and built an exe.  The exe is dropped on the client
machine (among many other things) as a tool via a scripted setup script we
run and is called from other build-related scripts.

I only really need post and patch functionality and we hard-code the RB url.

Thanks for the response!!!

--Daniel


On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Christian Hammond <
christ...@beanbaginc.com> wrote:

> Out of curiosity, why not use the RBTools installer we already provide?
>
> The single .exe route will have limitations. I've done a lot of
> py2exe/pyinstaller work in the past for other projects, and it's not a
> route I'd recommend if you can avoid it, at least for more complex projects.
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond
> President/CEO of Beanbag 
> Makers of Review Board 
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Daniel Kuecker 
> wrote:
>
>> Has anyone been successful building RBTools 0.7.6 into a single-file exe
>> for distribution on windows?
>>
>> I'm trying to wrap rbt post functionality into an exe file and both
>> py2exe and pyinstaller built exes are having issues when pkg_resources
>> tries to resolve the rbtools package.
>>
>> The exe builds fine, but when I run it, I get a
>> "pkg_resources.distributionnotfound: the 'rbtools' distribution was not
>> found and is required by the application" error.
>>
>> I've tried listing rbtools as hidden imports and importing an egg
>> (although the egg import was never successful), to no avail.
>>
>> Thanks in advance!
>>
>> --Daniel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
>> https://rbcommons.com/
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Building RBTools 0.7.6 into a single-file exe for Windows

2016-09-23 Thread Daniel Kuecker 
YES!  Thats a wonderful idea (the single shared install)!  Thanks for the
idea!  I think it will work for us!

--Daniel

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Christian Hammond  wrote:

> Sorry, I don't have any pointers here. Tools like py2exe drastically
> changes the way Python projects execute, which can end up causing a large
> number of tricky to diagnose issues. Having done a lot of
> py2exe/pyinstaller work in the past, it's not a route I'd want to go again.
>
> While I'd accept reasonable patches for things RBTools is doing, it's
> important to note that some things simply will not work, and those are
> things we must ship with. Examples would be any commands that reference a
> shipped data file, or otherwise need to deal with something relative to a
> module path.
>
> I understand the desire to have a single .exe you can drop on development
> machines, but am not sold on this being the way to go. What a lot of
> companies do is have a single shared install of RBTools in some common
> directory on a file server, and have that directory added to the path. Some
> use a wrapper script to set the PYTHON_PATH and such for that. This gives
> you central management of RBTools, usage of the RBTools API, and wouldn't
> require the kinds of work that would be needed to get things in shape for
> tools like py2exe to work.
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond
> President/CEO of Beanbag 
> Makers of Review Board 
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Daniel Kuecker 
> wrote:
>
>> Any pointers?
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:54 PM, john levin 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I did.. and i was successful..
>>>
>>> On Sep 23, 2016 12:30 AM, "Daniel Kuecker"  wrote:
>>>
 Has anyone been successful building RBTools 0.7.6 into a single-file
 exe for distribution on windows?

 I'm trying to wrap rbt post functionality into an exe file and both
 py2exe and pyinstaller built exes are having issues when pkg_resources
 tries to resolve the rbtools package.

 The exe builds fine, but when I run it, I get a
 "pkg_resources.distributionnotfound: the 'rbtools' distribution was
 not found and is required by the application" error.

 I've tried listing rbtools as hidden imports and importing an egg
 (although the egg import was never successful), to no avail.

 Thanks in advance!

 --Daniel




 --
 Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
 https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
 https://rbcommons.com/
 Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups "reviewboard" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

>>> --
>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
>>> https://rbcommons.com/
>>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "reviewboard" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
>> https://rbcommons.com/
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know!

RBTools Ticket #4470: UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xb0 in position 1: ordinal not in range(128)

2016-09-23 Thread yufanwind 
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4470/
--

New ticket #4470 by kone
For Beanbag, Inc. > RBTools

Status: New
Tags: Priority:Medium, Type:Defect


--
UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xb0 in position 1: ordinal 
not in range(128)
==

What version are you running?
rbt 0.7.6

What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
Our local review board server...

What steps will reproduce the problem?
I run "rbt post -d" and pass the "--username" and "--server" options.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
I expect rbt post to succeed :)

What operating system are you using? What browser?
Distributor ID: Microsoft Windows
Description:windows7 SP1 x64bit

Please provide any additional information below.

>>> RBTools 0.7.6
>>> Python 2.7.6 (default, Nov 10 2013, 19:24:18) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)]
>>> Running on Windows-7-6.1.7601-SP1
>>> Home = C:\Users\Administrator
etc

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:/Program Files (x86)/RBTools/bin/../Python27/Scripts/rbt-script.py", 
line 8, in 
load_entry_point('RBTools==0.7.6', 'console_scripts', 'rbt')()
  File "C:\Program Files 
(x86)\RBTools\Python27\lib\site-packages\rbtools-0.7.6-py2.7.egg\rbtools\commands\main.py",
 line 133, in main
command.run_from_argv([RB_MAIN, command_name] + args)
  File "C:\Program Files 
(x86)\RBTools\Python27\lib\site-packages\rbtools-0.7.6-py2.7.egg\rbtools\commands__init__.py",
 line 629, in run_from_argv
exit_code = self.main(*args) or 0
  File "C:\Program Files 
(x86)\RBTools\Python27\lib\site-packages\rbtools-0.7.6-py2.7.egg\rbtools\commands\post.py",
 line 805, in main
base_dir=base_dir)
  File "C:\Program Files 
(x86)\RBTools\Python27\lib\site-packages\rbtools-0.7.6-py2.7.egg\rbtools\commands\post.py",
 line 445, in post_request
diff_content, **diff_kwargs)
  File "C:\Program Files 
(x86)\RBTools\Python27\lib\site-packages\rbtools-0.7.6-py2.7.egg\rbtools\api\decorators.py",
 line 27, in request_method
*args, **kwargs)
  File "C:\Program Files 
(x86)\RBTools\Python27\lib\site-packages\rbtools-0.7.6-py2.7.egg\rbtools\api\transport\sync.py",
 line 75, in execute_request_method
return self._execute_request(request)
  File "C:\Program Files 
(x86)\RBTools\Python27\lib\site-packages\rbtools-0.7.6-py2.7.egg\rbtools\api\transport\sync.py",
 line 84, in _execute_request
rsp = self.server.make_request(request)
  File "C:\Program Files 
(x86)\RBTools\Python27\lib\site-packages\rbtools-0.7.6-py2.7.egg\rbtools\api\request.py",
 line 572, in make_request
content_type, body = request.encode_multipart_formdata()
  File "C:\Program Files 
(x86)\RBTools\Python27\lib\site-packages\rbtools-0.7.6-py2.7.egg\rbtools\api\request.py",
 line 119, in encode_multipart_formdata
mime_type = mimetypes.guess_type(filename)[0]
  File "C:\Program Files (x86)\RBTools\Python27\lib\mimetypes.py", line 297, in 
guess_type
init()
  File "C:\Program Files (x86)\RBTools\Python27\lib\mimetypes.py", line 358, in 
init
db.read_windows_registry()
  File "C:\Program Files (x86)\RBTools\Python27\lib\mimetypes.py", line 258, in 
read_windows_registry
for subkeyname in enum_types(hkcr):
  File "C:\Program Files (x86)\RBTools\Python27\lib\mimetypes.py", line 249, in 
enum_types
ctype = ctype.encode(default_encoding) # omit in 3.x!
UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xb0 in position 1: ordinal 
not in range(128)

--

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard-issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Review Board Ticket #4469: Can you please provide maximum files count and total diff size for retrieving diff in diff tab

2016-09-23 Thread Santosh sthul 
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4469/
--

New update by santoshsthul
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4469


Reply:

Hello David,
1) We are using GITLAB for hosting repository
2) we are creating review request using API()

We are merging Sprint branch in master branch, after merging Sprint branch 
in master branch code should get reviewed.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard-issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Review Board Ticket #4471: Issues with naming a review "; " (no quotes)

2016-09-23 Thread Mauro Braunstein 
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4471/
--

New ticket #4471 by mauro7inf
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board

Status: New
Tags: Priority:Medium, Type:Defect


--
Issues with naming a review ";" (no quotes)
==

# What version are you running?
2.5, I think

# What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
rbcommons.com/s/bti/r/36936

# What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Create a review, name it ";" (no quotes)
2. Set reviewers
3. Publish it


# What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
RB complained that it needed reviewers in order to publish, though reviewers 
were listed; furthermore, a review email *was* actually sent to the reviewers, 
it's just the UI that didn't recognize this.  The behavior stopped once I 
renamed the review to "added ;" instead of simply ";".

# What operating system are you using? What browser?
OS X 10.11, Chrome 51

# Please provide any additional information below.

--

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard-issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.