Re: State of Reviewboard?
I'd like to know this too :). We're using the latest version, but it'd be nice to know what the status is based on the roadmap that's up at the moment. -- Arthur Kalmenson On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Sebastien Douche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi There :), what is the dev state? Could you update roadmap wiki page and add date for each step (alpha, beta...)? I use a very old revision (btw it's works with few minor bugs) but I don't want upgrade on unstable :). Thx. -- Sebastien Douche [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: State of Reviewboard?
I've been hesitant to really give out planned dates because honestly, we don't know. Between work and the holidays, we're pretty busy and any date we put on there would probably be optimistic. However, I can say that one of the last big pieces we want for this release is now up for review. It's large and may have some regressions, but once that's in we can start preparing to release our alphas/betas as per the roadmap. Right now, Review Board is pretty stable. We try to keep SVN stable since so many people use it, but one can never guarantee it. However, I'd say if you wanted to upgrade, now's not a bad time. Feel free to wait though until we release our first official alpha/beta. Christian -- Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] VMware, Inc. On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Arthur Kalmenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: I'd like to know this too :). We're using the latest version, but it'd be nice to know what the status is based on the roadmap that's up at the moment. -- Arthur Kalmenson On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Sebastien Douche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi There :), what is the dev state? Could you update roadmap wiki page and add date for each step (alpha, beta...)? I use a very old revision (btw it's works with few minor bugs) but I don't want upgrade on unstable :). Thx. -- Sebastien Douche [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
where did the post-review tool go?
I blew everything away because I found the nifty-neato new installer... but as far as I can tell the post-review tool didn't come down. Where can I go to get the latest version? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Where is the post-review tool
I installed the latest stuff (blew everything away first) and can't find the latest version of the post-review tool. Where do I go to get it? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Where is the post-review tool
AndyP wrote: I installed the latest stuff (blew everything away first) and can't find the latest version of the post-review tool. Where do I go to get it? You can pull it down from svn (and you can even use wget if you don't have svn to hand): http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/source/browse/trunk/reviewboard/contrib/tools/post-review Chris --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Where is the post-review tool
Yeah, this is the way to do it. Before long (pre-1.0) I expect to make post-review its own easy_installable thing. Christian -- Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] VMware, Inc. On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Chris Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: AndyP wrote: I installed the latest stuff (blew everything away first) and can't find the latest version of the post-review tool. Where do I go to get it? You can pull it down from svn (and you can even use wget if you don't have svn to hand): http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/source/browse/trunk/reviewboard/contrib/tools/post-review Chris --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Where is the post-review tool
I actually found it... in /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ ReviewBoard.(egg stuff)../reviewboard/contrib/tools Is this the latest and greatest? I guess I have to ask: Does reviewboard support cygwin+perforce on a windows environment? I have had nothing but trouble getting the post- review tool to work. I took a break for a couple of months hoping that things would settle down... our production environment is running something that is old - probably around March or April timeframe. I had to hand-tweak the post-review tool back then to make it work (from suggestions on this forum)... but I was hoping that all that had gone away. I really like the new installer - that makes the server side a snap. The client side though... The latest trouble I am having is that for some reason the tool is Unable to parse diff header. It's pretty obvious why when I run the -d flag to debug - it is trying to use the diff tool against a windows- formatted-pathname. i.e. diff -urNp /cygdrive/c/path_to_file/myfile.cpp c:\path_to_file \myfile.cpp and of course the diff will fail - it can't do that under cygwin. On Dec 4, 3:49 pm, Chris Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: AndyP wrote: I installed the latest stuff (blew everything away first) and can't find the latest version of the post-review tool. Where do I go to get it? You can pull it down from svn (and you can even use wget if you don't have svn to hand): http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/source/browse/trunk/reviewboard/... Chris --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Where is the post-review tool
It is probably the p4 where command that is throwing it off: $ p4 where //depot/dev/removed/gx/core/src/win32/desktop/myfile.cpp //depot/dev/removed/gx/core/src/win32/desktop/DesktopDeviceLite.cpp // apeterson-removed/removed/gx/core/src/win32/desktop/myfile.cpp c: \removed\gx\core\src\win32\desktop\myfile.cpp -- note that the 3rd output is in dos format. On Dec 4, 5:53 pm, AndyP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: cygwin bash shell. That's the only access I have to python on the machine. we are using cygwin for the make system anyway - and reviewboard tools fall nicely in there - if I can get them to work! Thanks! On Dec 4, 5:41 pm, Christian Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It has to do with people not using the right version of GNU diff, or weird stuff happening with file path delimiters with Cygwin. There's a change pending that will hopefully fix a lot of this up. Instead of calling out to diff, we'd be generating it inline. Are you running from cmd.exe or from the cygwin bash shell? Christian -- Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] VMware, Inc. On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 5:36 PM, AndyP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I actually found it... in /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ ReviewBoard.(egg stuff)../reviewboard/contrib/tools Is this the latest and greatest? I guess I have to ask: Does reviewboard support cygwin+perforce on a windows environment? I have had nothing but trouble getting the post- review tool to work. I took a break for a couple of months hoping that things would settle down... our production environment is running something that is old - probably around March or April timeframe. I had to hand-tweak the post-review tool back then to make it work (from suggestions on this forum)... but I was hoping that all that had gone away. I really like the new installer - that makes the server side a snap. The client side though... The latest trouble I am having is that for some reason the tool is Unable to parse diff header. It's pretty obvious why when I run the -d flag to debug - it is trying to use the diff tool against a windows- formatted-pathname. i.e. diff -urNp /cygdrive/c/path_to_file/myfile.cpp c:\path_to_file \myfile.cpp and of course the diff will fail - it can't do that under cygwin. On Dec 4, 3:49 pm, Chris Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: AndyP wrote: I installed the latest stuff (blew everything away first) and can't find the latest version of the post-review tool. Where do I go to get it? You can pull it down from svn (and you can even use wget if you don't have svn to hand): http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/source/browse/trunk/reviewboard/... Chris- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Where is the post-review tool
Yeah, that would do it. You sohuld be able to run Cygwin stuff from a dos box if you specify the full path to python. Could do a post-review wrapper script that does: c:\cygwin\bin\python \path\to\post-review blah blah See if it works at all. Ideally we'd make this work with cygwin, certainly, but I don't have anything set up to work on this right now so I'm not in a good position to investigate and fix it. Any takers? Christian -- Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] VMware, Inc. On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 5:59 PM, AndyP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is probably the p4 where command that is throwing it off: $ p4 where //depot/dev/removed/gx/core/src/win32/desktop/myfile.cpp //depot/dev/removed/gx/core/src/win32/desktop/DesktopDeviceLite.cpp // apeterson-removed/removed/gx/core/src/win32/desktop/myfile.cpp c: \removed\gx\core\src\win32\desktop\myfile.cpp -- note that the 3rd output is in dos format. On Dec 4, 5:53 pm, AndyP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: cygwin bash shell. That's the only access I have to python on the machine. we are using cygwin for the make system anyway - and reviewboard tools fall nicely in there - if I can get them to work! Thanks! On Dec 4, 5:41 pm, Christian Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It has to do with people not using the right version of GNU diff, or weird stuff happening with file path delimiters with Cygwin. There's a change pending that will hopefully fix a lot of this up. Instead of calling out to diff, we'd be generating it inline. Are you running from cmd.exe or from the cygwin bash shell? Christian -- Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] VMware, Inc. On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 5:36 PM, AndyP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I actually found it... in /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ ReviewBoard.(egg stuff)../reviewboard/contrib/tools Is this the latest and greatest? I guess I have to ask: Does reviewboard support cygwin+perforce on a windows environment? I have had nothing but trouble getting the post- review tool to work. I took a break for a couple of months hoping that things would settle down... our production environment is running something that is old - probably around March or April timeframe. I had to hand-tweak the post-review tool back then to make it work (from suggestions on this forum)... but I was hoping that all that had gone away. I really like the new installer - that makes the server side a snap. The client side though... The latest trouble I am having is that for some reason the tool is Unable to parse diff header. It's pretty obvious why when I run the -d flag to debug - it is trying to use the diff tool against a windows- formatted-pathname. i.e. diff -urNp /cygdrive/c/path_to_file/myfile.cpp c:\path_to_file \myfile.cpp and of course the diff will fail - it can't do that under cygwin. On Dec 4, 3:49 pm, Chris Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: AndyP wrote: I installed the latest stuff (blew everything away first) and can't find the latest version of the post-review tool. Where do I go to get it? You can pull it down from svn (and you can even use wget if you don't have svn to hand): http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/source/browse/trunk/reviewboard/... Chris- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Minimalist Admin Duties
Hi Christian, Thanks for the update. I will try and fill out a feature request. Cheers, -Lyndon- On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 6:24 AM, Christian Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Hi Lyndon. I realized there's a few Review Board e-mails I missed, so sorry for the really long delay on this. I'm trying to go through some of these now. The authentication is handled by Django for the most part. I don't know if Django has a way to specify default groups for users, and I don't believe it has anything built-in for registration notification. We could probably add something for these down the line. I suggest filing a feature request for each of these. I can't say when we'd get to it, given how much is on our plate, but it's something we'll keep in mind and maybe someone else will be able to help provide a patch. Christian -- Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] VMware, Inc. On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Lyndon Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Christian, Within the admin part of the application, I have setup a users authorization group that contains all the permissions for the following areas: - changedescs - diffviewer - reviews - sessions Without assigning some of these permissions, new users have run into problems creating a new review request with the post-review script. So, I took a blanket approach to the areas that seemed relevant. Anyway, once a new user registers, I manually go into the admin section and assign that new user to the users group, allowing them to inherit the permissions. What I would like to see is a way to indicate the following things: - A way to say that newly registered users should be assigned to a list of authorization groups. - A way for an email to be sent to staff users when a new user registers. Cheers, -Lyndon- Lyndon Washington w: http://blog.the-washingtons.com/ On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Christian Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: I don't believe Django provides any support for this and we have nothing written to do so. Can you describe what you're using the auth groups for and how you'd want this to work? Christian -- Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] VMware, Inc. On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 8:18 AM, Lyndon Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am setting up a ReviewBoard installation and have opened up registration for anyone who wants an account. Is there a way to give new registered users default authorization group assignment? Thanks ahead of time. Cheers, -Lyndon- Lyndon Washington w: http://blog.the-washingtons.com/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
