Re: How to confiure EMAILS for Reviews

2009-11-03 Thread Christian Hammond
What mail server do you use? Also, give this a try: rb-site manage /path/to/site shell At the prompt: from django.core.mail import send_mail send_mail("Test Subject", "This is a test", "youraddr...@yourdomain.com", ["youraddr...@yourdomain.com"], fail_silently=False) That *should*

Re: How to confiure EMAILS for Reviews

2009-11-03 Thread Kunjal
Chris, I have set the correct smtp host/port etc. but I still do not get email. Do I need to modify email.py file to get the email? Thanks Kunjal On Nov 2, 3:47 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > You should be able to configure that in the E-mail Settings part of the > Admin UI. If e-mail is not

API: How to get list of files affected in reviewrequest?

2009-11-03 Thread Pv
I am trying to automate hooking CodeReview in to an SVN pre-commit hook. For a preview of how I am doing this see my recent comment added to: http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/wiki/ReviewBoardAPI My pre-commit can get the reviewrequest and see reviewers and check for "ship_it", but now I need

Re: easy_install rbtools on py26?

2009-11-03 Thread Pv
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1383 On Nov 2, 12:42 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > Can you file a bug on this? > > We just need to turn off the sqlite dependency when building Python 2.6 > packages. > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > Review Bo

Re: How to post-commit review a first time checkin?

2009-11-03 Thread Pv
Yes, I want to do a post-commit review of the new files added/created in an SVN revision without making any actual changes to the already checked in files. The diff is indeed empty (I already knew this, just thought it was obvious and didn't share). Basically, two possibilities: 1) How to get "s

Re: How to make the description of the Review READ ONLY

2009-11-03 Thread Kunjal
Thanks. I got my answer. On Nov 2, 3:38 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > This isn't possible today without modifying Review Board heavliy. It's a > pretty specific policy choice and and we probably wouldn't want to add a > setting for it (as it's more to test, maintain, and isn't something that