Re: ReviewBoard with GIT
Sounds like git is not in the path. If that's the error you're getting, then it's definitely not finding that in the PATH that Apache sees. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Sapna Vempati wrote: > I am still not able to set RB for git. > > This is the local path where I have a workspace. This is the copy of the > main repository. To setup initially, will use this local path and not cgit > (just by periodic pull of main repository, to this local path): > /projects/mobcom_andrbuilds/users/reviewboard. > > I specified, the following in RB webpage, under *admin --> repositories,* > ** > *Hosting service::* custom > *Repository type::* git > *path:*/projects/mobcom_andrbuilds/users/reviewboard/brcm_tools/scripts/.git > *mirror path::* > *Raw file URL mask::* > > When I try to save, I get this error: > The executable "git" is not in the path. > I am not sure what I am missing. BTW, I have RB 1.5 Beta2 installed. > > Thanks for the help again, > Sapna > On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: > >> On Thursday, July 1, 2010, Sapna Vempati wrote: >> > Hi Christian, >> > I am trying to configure a repository on our RB test server, and am >> having trouble filling these fields below, >> > >> > When I am under--- admin ---> repositories, >> > >> > path: (It says) For git, this should be the path to the .git repository >> on the local disk. >> > >> > But the repo is not on the local disk, but on a central repository. Can >> I have the unix path to our central server on ubuntu ? (Since I am going to >> use cgit, I assume I don't have to clone the central repository to my local >> ?) >> >> >> This only needs to point to a local clone if you're not using the raw >> URL path. Otherwise, it should be the upstream path. >> >> > >> > >> > mirror path: ? >> > >> > Raw file URL Mask: >> > for example: The upper-level directory url with all paths to the .gits >> is: http://mobcom-git.sj.broadcom.com/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/git_repos (say >> under here I need to set to this repo: git_repos/repo_tools/scripts.git) >> > >> > How will I get the (can be a lot of file in this repo) & >> , as suggested on your website for this field. >> > < >> http://mobcom-git.sj.broadcom.com/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/git_repos/repo_tools/scripts.git/ >> > >> >> It's intended as a mask. The and are literala, >> which Review Board will automatically replace with the needed >> filename. >> >> This is being reworked for the final release and will be easier then. >> >> Christian >> >> -- >> -- >> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com >> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org >> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com >> >> -- >> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at >> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ >> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en >> > > -- > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: ReviewBoard with GIT
I am still not able to set RB for git. This is the local path where I have a workspace. This is the copy of the main repository. To setup initially, will use this local path and not cgit (just by periodic pull of main repository, to this local path): /projects/mobcom_andrbuilds/users/reviewboard. I specified, the following in RB webpage, under *admin --> repositories,* ** *Hosting service::* custom *Repository type::* git *path:*/projects/mobcom_andrbuilds/users/reviewboard/brcm_tools/scripts/.git *mirror path::* *Raw file URL mask::* When I try to save, I get this error: The executable "git" is not in the path. I am not sure what I am missing. BTW, I have RB 1.5 Beta2 installed. Thanks for the help again, Sapna On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: > On Thursday, July 1, 2010, Sapna Vempati wrote: > > Hi Christian, > > I am trying to configure a repository on our RB test server, and am > having trouble filling these fields below, > > > > When I am under--- admin ---> repositories, > > > > path: (It says) For git, this should be the path to the .git repository > on the local disk. > > > > But the repo is not on the local disk, but on a central repository. Can I > have the unix path to our central server on ubuntu ? (Since I am going to > use cgit, I assume I don't have to clone the central repository to my local > ?) > > > This only needs to point to a local clone if you're not using the raw > URL path. Otherwise, it should be the upstream path. > > > > > > > mirror path: ? > > > > Raw file URL Mask: > > for example: The upper-level directory url with all paths to the .gits > is: http://mobcom-git.sj.broadcom.com/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/git_repos (say > under here I need to set to this repo: git_repos/repo_tools/scripts.git) > > > > How will I get the (can be a lot of file in this repo) & > , as suggested on your website for this field. > > < > http://mobcom-git.sj.broadcom.com/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/git_repos/repo_tools/scripts.git/ > > > > It's intended as a mask. The and are literala, > which Review Board will automatically replace with the needed > filename. > > This is being reworked for the final release and will be easier then. > > Christian > > -- > -- > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org > VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com > > -- > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Error after install on RHEL
Hi, Can you show me step-by-step how you installed Review Board? Also, some more information on your setup is needed. What version of Review Board is tihs? What version of Django? Which web server and Python module (mod_python, fastcgi, ...) Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Buzz wrote: > Hi, > Sorry if this has been covered in the past but i don't seem to be able > to find the hsolution. > I have just install reviewboard on RHEL 5.5 x64. After the install I > am asked > > > Manual server updates required > > A recent change requires manual updates to be made on this server. > After these changes are made, you should restart your server. > > To keep track of future updates, please visit the Required Server > Updates page, or subscribe to the mailing list. > > The Review Board database schema has changed since your last > upgrade. To update your schema, run: > > $ ./manage.py syncdb >Follow any additional instructions it may give you. If, for > example, it tells you to perform a schema evolution, run: > > $ ./manage.py evolve --execute > > I ran ./manage.py syncdb but i get the output > > [r...@reviewboard conf.d]# > /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.9-py2.4.egg/ > reviewboard/manage.py > syncdb > Unable to read settings_local.py. > > Please see http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/ > for help setting up Review Board. > > Any ideas? > > Thanks > > Hywel > > -- > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Error after install on RHEL
Hi, Sorry if this has been covered in the past but i don't seem to be able to find the hsolution. I have just install reviewboard on RHEL 5.5 x64. After the install I am asked Manual server updates required A recent change requires manual updates to be made on this server. After these changes are made, you should restart your server. To keep track of future updates, please visit the Required Server Updates page, or subscribe to the mailing list. The Review Board database schema has changed since your last upgrade. To update your schema, run: $ ./manage.py syncdb Follow any additional instructions it may give you. If, for example, it tells you to perform a schema evolution, run: $ ./manage.py evolve --execute I ran ./manage.py syncdb but i get the output [r...@reviewboard conf.d]# /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.9-py2.4.egg/ reviewboard/manage.py syncdb Unable to read settings_local.py. Please see http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/ for help setting up Review Board. Any ideas? Thanks Hywel -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Error while rb-site install
You need to upgrade to Review Board 1.0.9.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Dhanabalan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After I have passed all the information on rb-site install /var/www/
> reviews.in.db.com, I am getting the below error:
>
> * Installing the site...
> Building site directories ... OK
> Building site configuration files ... OK
> /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.4.egg/django/db/
> __init__.py:18: PendingDeprecationWarning: settings.DATABASE_* is
> deprecated; use settings.DATABASES instead.
> PendingDeprecationWarning
> /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.4.egg/django/db/
> __init__.py:57: PendingDeprecationWarning: Short names for ENGINE in
> database configurations are deprecated. Prepend default.ENGINE with
> 'django.db.backends.'
> PendingDeprecationWarning
> /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.4.egg/django/db/
> models/fields/subclassing.py:71: PendingDeprecationWarning: A Field
> class whose get_db_prep_value method hasn't been updated to take
> `connection` and `prepared` arguments.
> setattr(new_cls, attr,
> call_with_connection_and_prepared(getattr(new_cls, attr)))
> /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.4.egg/django/db/
> models/fields/subclassing.py:69: PendingDeprecationWarning: A Field
> class whose db_type method hasn't been updated to take a `connection`
> argument.
> setattr(new_cls, attr, call_with_connection(getattr(new_cls, attr)))
> /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.4.egg/django/db/
> models/fields/subclassing.py:69: PendingDeprecationWarning: A Field
> class whose get_db_prep_save method hasn't been updated to take a
> `connection` argument.
> setattr(new_cls, attr, call_with_connection(getattr(new_cls, attr)))
> Creating database ... Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/rb-site", line 7, in ?
>sys.exit(
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.1.dev-
> py2.4.egg/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py", line 1476, in main
>command.run()
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.1.dev-
> py2.4.egg/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py", line 1076, in run
>self.show_install_status()
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.1.dev-
> py2.4.egg/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py", line 1327, in
> show_install_status
>site.sync_database)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.1.dev-
> py2.4.egg/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py", line 648, in step
>func()
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.1.dev-
> py2.4.egg/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py", line 313, in sync_database
>self.run_manage_command("syncdb", ["--noinput"])
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.1.dev-
> py2.4.egg/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py", line 351, in
> run_manage_command
>execute_manager(reviewboard.settings, [__file__, cmd] + params)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.4.egg/django/
> core/management/__init__.py", line 438, in execute_manager
>utility.execute()
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.4.egg/django/
> core/management/__init__.py", line 379, in execute
>self.fetch_command(subcommand).run_from_argv(self.argv)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.4.egg/django/
> core/management/base.py", line 191, in run_from_argv
>self.execute(*args, **options.__dict__)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.4.egg/django/
> core/management/base.py", line 218, in execute
>output = self.handle(*args, **options)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.4.egg/django/
> core/management/base.py", line 347, in handle
>return self.handle_noargs(**options)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.4.egg/django/
> core/management/commands/syncdb.py", line 103, in handle_noargs
>emit_post_sync_signal(created_models, verbosity, interactive, db)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.4.egg/django/
> core/management/sql.py", line 185, in emit_post_sync_signal
>interactive=interactive, db=db)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.4.egg/django/
> dispatch/dispatcher.py", line 162, in send
>response = receiver(signal=self, sender=sender, **named)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.1.dev-
> py2.4.egg/reviewboard/admin/management/sites.py", line 21, in
> init_siteconfig
>create_default_site(app, created_models, verbosity)
> TypeError: create_default_site() takes exactly 4 arguments (3 given)
>
> Can you please help me to understand what is the 4th argument missing?
>
> Best regards,
> Dhanabalan.
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~---
RE: Error uploading diff: One or more fields had errors (105) - Errors during command execution( "p4 login" )
It looks like you're having a server-side Perforce issue.
Basically, the review board server has to be able to talk to Perforce
(not just the client-side) and it's having a login issue.
So you can run p4 commands and it's working fine, but the server is
unable to do so.
You should be able to fix this by setting up P4PORT, P4USER, P4PASSWD,
and P4CLIENT variables on the server side.
Dana Lacoste
-Original Message-
From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewbo...@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Chidambar
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 5:03 AM
To: reviewboard
Subject: Error uploading diff: One or more fields had errors (105) -
Errors during command execution( "p4 login" )
I am unable to post the review. PSB.
...
>>> HTTP POSTing to http://ESMRB/api/json/reviewrequests/15/diff/new/:
{}
Error uploading diff: One or more fields had errors (105)
>>> {'fields': {'path': ['[P4#run] Errors during command execution( "p4
login" )
\n\n\t[Error]: Password invalid.\n\n']}, 'stat': 'fail', 'err':
{'msg': 'One or
more fields had errors', 'code': 105}}
Your review request still exists, but the diff is not attached.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Error uploading diff: One or more fields had errors (105) - Errors during command execution( "p4 login" )
I am unable to post the review. PSB.
D:\ReviewBoard\tools>python post-review -d 667521
>>> Repository info 'Path: perforce2.ges.symc.com:1666, Base path: None, Sup
ports changesets: True'
>>> Generating diff for changenum 667521
>>> p4 describe -s 667521
>>> Processing edit of
>>> //depot/Enterprise_Security_Manager/core/ESMSULU/csrc/server/_nt.mak
>>> Writing
>>> "//depot/Enterprise_Security_Manager/core/ESMSULU/csrc/server/_nt.mak#1" to
>>> "c:\docume~1\admini~1\locals~1\temp\1\tmppremcg"
>>> p4 print -q
>>> //depot/Enterprise_Security_Manager/core/ESMSULU/csrc/server/_nt.mak#1
>>> p4 where
>>> //depot/Enterprise_Security_Manager/core/ESMSULU/csrc/server/_nt.mak
>>> diff -urNp c:\docume~1\admini~1\locals~1\temp\1\tmppremcg
>>> D:/P4\Enterprise_Security_Manager\core\ESMSULU\csrc\server\_nt.mak
>>> Processing edit of
>>> //depot/Enterprise_Security_Manager/Docs/Dev/PuneDocs/Common/Dev Test
>>> Machine Details.xls
>>> Writing "//depot/Enterprise_Security_Manager/Docs/Dev/PuneDocs/Common/Dev
>>> Test Machine Details.xls#656" to
>>> "c:\docume~1\admini~1\locals~1\temp\1\tmppremcg"
>>> p4 print -q
>>> "//depot/Enterprise_Security_Manager/Docs/Dev/PuneDocs/Common/Dev Test
>>> Machine Details.xls#656"
>>> p4 where "//depot/Enterprise_Security_Manager/Docs/Dev/PuneDocs/Common/Dev
>>> Test Machine Details.xls"
>>> diff -urNp c:\docume~1\admini~1\locals~1\temp\1\tmppremcg Machine
>>> Looking for 'ESMRB /' cookie in C:\Documents and
>>> Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Application
>>> Data\.post-review-cookies.txt
>>> Cookie file loaded, but no cookie for this server
==> Review Board Login Required
Enter username and password for Review Board at http://ESMRB/
Username: abc
Password: xyz
>>> Logging in with username "abc"
>>> HTTP POSTing to http://ESMRB/api/json/accounts/login/: {'username': 'abc',
>>> 'password': '**'}
>>> Logged in.
>>> Attempting to create review request for 667521
>>> HTTP POSTing to http://ESMRB/api/json/reviewrequests/new/: {'repository_path
': 'perforce2.ges.symc.com:1666', 'changenum': '667521'}
>>> Review request already exists. Updating it...
>>> HTTP POSTing to http://ESMRB/api/json/reviewrequests/15/update_from_changenu
m/: {}
>>> Review request created
>>> Uploading diff, size: 1115
>>> HTTP POSTing to http://ESMRB/api/json/reviewrequests/15/diff/new/: {}
Error uploading diff: One or more fields had errors (105)
>>> {'fields': {'path': ['[P4#run] Errors during command execution( "p4 login" )
\n\n\t[Error]: Password invalid.\n\n']}, 'stat': 'fail', 'err':
{'msg': 'One or
more fields had errors', 'code': 105}}
Your review request still exists, but the diff is not attached.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Error while rb-site install
Hello,
After I have passed all the information on rb-site install /var/www/
reviews.in.db.com, I am getting the below error:
* Installing the site...
Building site directories ... OK
Building site configuration files ... OK
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.4.egg/django/db/
__init__.py:18: PendingDeprecationWarning: settings.DATABASE_* is
deprecated; use settings.DATABASES instead.
PendingDeprecationWarning
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.4.egg/django/db/
__init__.py:57: PendingDeprecationWarning: Short names for ENGINE in
database configurations are deprecated. Prepend default.ENGINE with
'django.db.backends.'
PendingDeprecationWarning
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.4.egg/django/db/
models/fields/subclassing.py:71: PendingDeprecationWarning: A Field
class whose get_db_prep_value method hasn't been updated to take
`connection` and `prepared` arguments.
setattr(new_cls, attr,
call_with_connection_and_prepared(getattr(new_cls, attr)))
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.4.egg/django/db/
models/fields/subclassing.py:69: PendingDeprecationWarning: A Field
class whose db_type method hasn't been updated to take a `connection`
argument.
setattr(new_cls, attr, call_with_connection(getattr(new_cls, attr)))
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.4.egg/django/db/
models/fields/subclassing.py:69: PendingDeprecationWarning: A Field
class whose get_db_prep_save method hasn't been updated to take a
`connection` argument.
setattr(new_cls, attr, call_with_connection(getattr(new_cls, attr)))
Creating database ... Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/rb-site", line 7, in ?
sys.exit(
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.1.dev-
py2.4.egg/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py", line 1476, in main
command.run()
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.1.dev-
py2.4.egg/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py", line 1076, in run
self.show_install_status()
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.1.dev-
py2.4.egg/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py", line 1327, in
show_install_status
site.sync_database)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.1.dev-
py2.4.egg/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py", line 648, in step
func()
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.1.dev-
py2.4.egg/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py", line 313, in sync_database
self.run_manage_command("syncdb", ["--noinput"])
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.1.dev-
py2.4.egg/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py", line 351, in
run_manage_command
execute_manager(reviewboard.settings, [__file__, cmd] + params)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.4.egg/django/
core/management/__init__.py", line 438, in execute_manager
utility.execute()
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.4.egg/django/
core/management/__init__.py", line 379, in execute
self.fetch_command(subcommand).run_from_argv(self.argv)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.4.egg/django/
core/management/base.py", line 191, in run_from_argv
self.execute(*args, **options.__dict__)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.4.egg/django/
core/management/base.py", line 218, in execute
output = self.handle(*args, **options)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.4.egg/django/
core/management/base.py", line 347, in handle
return self.handle_noargs(**options)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.4.egg/django/
core/management/commands/syncdb.py", line 103, in handle_noargs
emit_post_sync_signal(created_models, verbosity, interactive, db)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.4.egg/django/
core/management/sql.py", line 185, in emit_post_sync_signal
interactive=interactive, db=db)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.4.egg/django/
dispatch/dispatcher.py", line 162, in send
response = receiver(signal=self, sender=sender, **named)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.1.dev-
py2.4.egg/reviewboard/admin/management/sites.py", line 21, in
init_siteconfig
create_default_site(app, created_models, verbosity)
TypeError: create_default_site() takes exactly 4 arguments (3 given)
Can you please help me to understand what is the 4th argument missing?
Best regards,
Dhanabalan.
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
