Re: Error in installing Review Board
Hi, I am using Python 2.6 which i suppose should be fine and should not conflict with the issues of using Python 2.4. Rohan. On Jun 9, 5:37 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: I should point out (we'll make an official announcement when the time comes, though it'll be a while) that RB 1.6 is likely going to be the last release to support Python 2.4. Django has a Python deprecation schedule that we'll be following. So ideally, people should make sure they can use newer versions of Python. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Jan Koprowski jan.koprow...@gmail.comwrote: Stephen, If You can run Python 2.4 - this is not the case because of really nice setup.py maintaining all necessary Python dependencies. VirtualEnv solve almost all problems - only incompatible with mod_wsgi Apache could be a problem. Sometimes You must run something on very old machine and upgrading it is not the case because sometimes you are not owner of machine :) Regards, On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 06:42 -0700, ROAAN wrote: Hi, I am installing ReviewBoard on my machine running Fedora 10. I seem to It's worth noting that Fedora 10 was declared end-of-life almost two years ago, so you're probably going to run into difficulty installing ANY new software on it. It would be prudent to upgrade to a supported operating system like Fedora 14 or 15, or move to a long-term supported release like Red Hat Enterprise Linux or CentOS. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Jan Koprowski -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Error in installing Review Board
Rohan, Did You read and try: http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.5/admin/installation/linux/ ? Regards, On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:35 PM, ROAAN rohan.raiza...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am using Python 2.6 which i suppose should be fine and should not conflict with the issues of using Python 2.4. Rohan. On Jun 9, 5:37 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: I should point out (we'll make an official announcement when the time comes, though it'll be a while) that RB 1.6 is likely going to be the last release to support Python 2.4. Django has a Python deprecation schedule that we'll be following. So ideally, people should make sure they can use newer versions of Python. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Jan Koprowski jan.koprow...@gmail.comwrote: Stephen, If You can run Python 2.4 - this is not the case because of really nice setup.py maintaining all necessary Python dependencies. VirtualEnv solve almost all problems - only incompatible with mod_wsgi Apache could be a problem. Sometimes You must run something on very old machine and upgrading it is not the case because sometimes you are not owner of machine :) Regards, On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 06:42 -0700, ROAAN wrote: Hi, I am installing ReviewBoard on my machine running Fedora 10. I seem to It's worth noting that Fedora 10 was declared end-of-life almost two years ago, so you're probably going to run into difficulty installing ANY new software on it. It would be prudent to upgrade to a supported operating system like Fedora 14 or 15, or move to a long-term supported release like Red Hat Enterprise Linux or CentOS. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Jan Koprowski -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Jan Koprowski -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Error in installing Review Board
Jan, Yes I have been following the exact sequence of steps outlined there. Actually, I have read it so many times that its memorized to me :-). Anyhow, one thing which I think might be causing the issue is that I am having easy_install-2.6, easy_install-2.5. Since the python version I am using is 2.6.1 so I tried installing using easy_install-2.6. The error trace that I posted above has the first warning as warning: GMP library not found; Not building Crypto.PublicKey._fastmath, but I checked that is installed on my system as well. I am not sure about if i need to set up a path for it / some sort of link for my python environment to be aware about it. Thanks, Rohan. On Jun 10, 10:09 am, Jan Koprowski jan.koprow...@gmail.com wrote: Rohan, Did You read and try:http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.5/admin/installation/linux/? Regards, On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:35 PM, ROAAN rohan.raiza...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am using Python 2.6 which i suppose should be fine and should not conflict with the issues of using Python 2.4. Rohan. On Jun 9, 5:37 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: I should point out (we'll make an official announcement when the time comes, though it'll be a while) that RB 1.6 is likely going to be the last release to support Python 2.4. Django has a Python deprecation schedule that we'll be following. So ideally, people should make sure they can use newer versions of Python. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Jan Koprowski jan.koprow...@gmail.comwrote: Stephen, If You can run Python 2.4 - this is not the case because of really nice setup.py maintaining all necessary Python dependencies. VirtualEnv solve almost all problems - only incompatible with mod_wsgi Apache could be a problem. Sometimes You must run something on very old machine and upgrading it is not the case because sometimes you are not owner of machine :) Regards, On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 06:42 -0700, ROAAN wrote: Hi, I am installing ReviewBoard on my machine running Fedora 10. I seem to It's worth noting that Fedora 10 was declared end-of-life almost two years ago, so you're probably going to run into difficulty installing ANY new software on it. It would be prudent to upgrade to a supported operating system like Fedora 14 or 15, or move to a long-term supported release like Red Hat Enterprise Linux or CentOS. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Jan Koprowski -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Jan Koprowski -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: IntegrityError
Hello all, For the record, my problem was caused by a corruption of our mysql backend. (ran out of spaceunbelievable, but I must come clean) I figured this out and then ran some mysqlcheck type of actions to repair. We are good now. Thank you all! Chris On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Christopher Hahn xrz1...@gmail.com wrote: Christian, I am seeing MySQL as our backend: = DATABASE_ENGINE = 'mysql' DATABASE_NAME = 'reviewboard' DATABASE_USER = 'reviewboard' = ...and it is a perforce repository that we are working with here. Please let me know if this was not what you wanted to know. ...and I will try to analyze the dump as you suggest. Thank you very much for the kind attention, Christopher On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: The mcm errors shouldn't actually be related (though it may mean your memcached isn't working properly?). So it sounds like the database schema is correct and up-to-date. It's probably some double entry in the database then. What repository backing are you using? We need to find out what field the NULL-1 is in (and what actually generated that). What you can try is to dump your database contents using mysqldump to a text file, then searching it for NULL-1. It should reveal what field it's in. I can make more educated guesses after I know that. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Christopher Hahn xrz1...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I did run the 'rb-site upgrade'. Can you confirm that I gave it the right path to RB? It does seem to have chewed on something, but I get errors, and you see below. I may need to start with a fresh installbut if I cannot migrate the data, then I will be in a bad place. Thank you all so very much for taking the time. It is heartening to have company. ;0) Chris === root@servicemanager:/data2/ReviewBoard# rb-site upgrade /data2/ReviewBoard Rebuilding directory structure Updating database. This may take a while. /var/lib/python-support/python2.6/MySQLdb/__init__.py:34: DeprecationWarning: the sets module is deprecated from sets import ImmutableSet [NOTICE@1307646025.131383] mcm_server_connect():2302: Software caused connection abort [NOTICE@1307646025.131517] mcm_server_connect():2302: Software caused connection abort [NOTICE@1307646025.131573] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2333: Software caused connection abort [WARN@1307646025.131614] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2338 [NOTICE@1307646025.131676] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 Upgrading Review Board from 1.5 to 1.5.5 [NOTICE@1307646025.131902] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 [NOTICE@1307646025.132022] mcm_atomic_cmd():649 [NOTICE@1307646025.195105] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 [NOTICE@1307646025.195214] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 [NOTICE@1307646025.221598] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 [NOTICE@1307646025.221678] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 [NOTICE@1307646025.238188] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 [NOTICE@1307646025.238276] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 [NOTICE@1307646025.266242] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 [NOTICE@1307646025.266347] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 [NOTICE@1307646025.292776] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 [NOTICE@1307646025.292856] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 [NOTICE@1307646025.315523] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 [NOTICE@1307646025.315571] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 [NOTICE@1307646025.333410] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 [NOTICE@1307646025.333452] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 [NOTICE@1307646025.346766] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 [NOTICE@1307646025.346810] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 [NOTICE@1307646025.369352] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 [NOTICE@1307646025.369395] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 [NOTICE@1307646025.418996] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 [NOTICE@1307646025.419049] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 [NOTICE@1307646025.437399] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 [NOTICE@1307646025.437443] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 [NOTICE@1307646025.455682] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 [NOTICE@1307646025.455733] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 No fixtures found. /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/pycrypto-2.3-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/randpool.py:40: RandomPool_DeprecationWarning: This application uses RandomPool, which is BROKEN in older releases. See http://www.pycrypto.org/randpool-broken No evolution required. Upgrade complete. === On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
1.6 beta 2 - email EOF error
Hi, I just upgraded to 1.6 beta 2 porting my database over. I was using 1.5 before, with email working ok. I left the email settings intact, using MS online services. The settings are - Mail server: Smtp.mail.microsoftonline.com Port: 587 [checked] Use TLS for authentication I now get this error - [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] 2011-06-10 14:05:11,532 - ERROR - Error sending e-mail notification with subject 'Review Request: Test diff' on behalf of '*** sender removed ***' to '*** email addresses removed ***') [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] Traceback (most recent call last): [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File /usr/lib/python2.4/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/notifications/ email.py, line 236, in send_review_mail [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] message.send() [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File /usr/lib/python2.4/site- packages/Django-1.3-py2.4.egg/django/core/mail/message.py, line 251, in send [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] return self.get_connection(fail_silently).send_messages([self]) [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File /usr/lib/python2.4/site- packages/Django-1.3-py2.4.egg/django/core/mail/backends/smtp.py, line 86, in send_messages [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] sent = self._send(message) [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File /usr/lib/python2.4/site- packages/Django-1.3-py2.4.egg/django/core/mail/backends/smtp.py, line 104, in _send [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] email_message.message().as_string()) [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File /usr/lib64/python2.4/ smtplib.py, line 679, in sendmail [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] self.rset() [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File /usr/lib64/python2.4/ smtplib.py, line 449, in rset [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] return self.docmd(rset) [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File /usr/lib64/python2.4/ smtplib.py, line 374, in docmd [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] return self.getreply() [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File /usr/lib64/python2.4/ smtplib.py, line 348, in getreply [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] line = self.file.readline() [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File /usr/lib64/python2.4/ smtplib.py, line 160, in readline [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] chr = self.sslobj.read(1) [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] sslerror: (8, 'EOF occurred in violation of protocol') Any thoughts? I tried this by posting a review from an old diff that was in the database from 1.5. And I also submitted a new diff report and got the same error. Thanks, Daryl -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: post-reviews: The requested URL could not be retrieved
You appear to have a DNS problem:
Unable to determine IP address from host name for server_name.
What does nslookup server_name say?
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We've been trying to run post-review but have been running into a
requested URL could not be retrieved error
We're running:
ReviewBoard 1.5.5 on Windows XP
Python 2.5.x
Apache 2.2.x
Subversion 1.6.16, running on a sparc-solaris2.10
Here is the output after adding the --debug option:
--
post-review --server=server_name/rb_site --username= --
password= --revision-range=8325 --debug
RBTools 0.3.2
Home = C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data
svn info
diff --version
repository info: Path: svn-server/ParentPath/RepoName, Base pa
th: /trunk, Supports changesets: False
HTTP GETting api/
Got HTTP error: 503: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01
Transition
al//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd;
HTMLHEADMETA HTTP-EQUIV=Content-Type CONTENT=text/html;
charset=iso-8859
-1
TITLEERROR: The requested URL could not be retrieved/TITLE
STYLE type=text/css!--BODY{background-color:#ff;font-
family:verdana,san
s-serif}PRE{font-family:sans-serif}--/STYLE
/HEADBODY
H2The requested URL could not be retrieved/H2
HR noshade size=1px
P
While trying to retrieve the URL:
A HREF=server_name/rb_site/api/server_name/rb_site/api//
A
P
The following error was encountered:
BLOCKQUOTE
Unable to determine IP address from host name for
Iserver_name/I
/BLOCKQUOTE
P
The dnsserver returned:
BLOCKQUOTE
Name Error: The domain name does not exist.
/BLOCKQUOTE
P
This means that:
PRE
The cache was not able to resolve the hostname presented in the URL.
Check if the address is correct.
--
Thanks!
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
--tucker
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: post-reviews: The requested URL could not be retrieved
Hi Tucker,
Thanks for the reply.
I ran nslookup server_name from both server_name (XP server) and
from a sparc-solaris2.10 machine.
Both return
Name: server_name.domain
Address: ip_address
On Jun 10, 11:15 am, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote:
You appear to have a DNS problem:
Unable to determine IP address from host name for server_name.
What does nslookup server_name say?
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We've been trying to run post-review but have been running into a
requested URL could not be retrieved error
We're running:
ReviewBoard 1.5.5 on Windows XP
Python 2.5.x
Apache 2.2.x
Subversion 1.6.16, running on a sparc-solaris2.10
Here is the output after adding the --debug option:
--
post-review --server=server_name/rb_site --username= --
password= --revision-range=8325 --debug
RBTools 0.3.2
Home = C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data
svn info
diff --version
repository info: Path: svn-server/ParentPath/RepoName, Base pa
th: /trunk, Supports changesets: False
HTTP GETting api/
Got HTTP error: 503: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01
Transition
al//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd;
HTMLHEADMETA HTTP-EQUIV=Content-Type CONTENT=text/html;
charset=iso-8859
-1
TITLEERROR: The requested URL could not be retrieved/TITLE
STYLE type=text/css!--BODY{background-color:#ff;font-
family:verdana,san
s-serif}PRE{font-family:sans-serif}--/STYLE
/HEADBODY
H2The requested URL could not be retrieved/H2
HR noshade size=1px
P
While trying to retrieve the URL:
A HREF=server_name/rb_site/api/server_name/rb_site/api//
A
P
The following error was encountered:
BLOCKQUOTE
Unable to determine IP address from host name for
Iserver_name/I
/BLOCKQUOTE
P
The dnsserver returned:
BLOCKQUOTE
Name Error: The domain name does not exist.
/BLOCKQUOTE
P
This means that:
PRE
The cache was not able to resolve the hostname presented in the URL.
Check if the address is correct.
--
Thanks!
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today
athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group
athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
--tucker
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: post-reviews: The requested URL could not be retrieved
Are you using a full server path starting with http:// ? Are you
behind a proxy server?
Christian
On Friday, June 10, 2011, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tucker,
Thanks for the reply.
I ran nslookup server_name from both server_name (XP server) and
from a sparc-solaris2.10 machine.
Both return
Name: server_name.domain
Address: ip_address
On Jun 10, 11:15 am, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote:
You appear to have a DNS problem:
Unable to determine IP address from host name for server_name.
What does nslookup server_name say?
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We've been trying to run post-review but have been running into a
requested URL could not be retrieved error
We're running:
ReviewBoard 1.5.5 on Windows XP
Python 2.5.x
Apache 2.2.x
Subversion 1.6.16, running on a sparc-solaris2.10
Here is the output after adding the --debug option:
--
post-review --server=server_name/rb_site --username= --
password= --revision-range=8325 --debug
RBTools 0.3.2
Home = C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data
svn info
diff --version
repository info: Path: svn-server/ParentPath/RepoName, Base pa
th: /trunk, Supports changesets: False
HTTP GETting api/
Got HTTP error: 503: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01
Transition
al//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd;
HTMLHEADMETA HTTP-EQUIV=Content-Type CONTENT=text/html;
charset=iso-8859
-1
TITLEERROR: The requested URL could not be retrieved/TITLE
STYLE type=text/css!--BODY{background-color:#ff;font-
family:verdana,san
s-serif}PRE{font-family:sans-serif}--/STYLE
/HEADBODY
H2The requested URL could not be retrieved/H2
HR noshade size=1px
P
While trying to retrieve the URL:
A HREF=server_name/rb_site/api/server_name/rb_site/api//
A
P
The following error was encountered:
BLOCKQUOTE
Unable to determine IP address from host name for
Iserver_name/I
/BLOCKQUOTE
P
The dnsserver returned:
BLOCKQUOTE
Name Error: The domain name does not exist.
/BLOCKQUOTE
P
This means that:
PRE
The cache was not able to resolve the hostname presented in the URL.
Check if the address is correct.
--
Thanks!
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today
athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group
athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
--tucker
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: 1.6 beta 2 - email EOF error
Hi Daryl, The only thing I know has changed on our end is the addition of a Sender: header. It shouldn't break anything, but perhaps they're strict and disconnect you early. I don't know what has changed in Django, but maybe something broke there. To rule out Review Board as the cause, go into Admin UI - Settings - E-mail and remove the Sender e-mail address. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Daryl darylnebr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I just upgraded to 1.6 beta 2 porting my database over. I was using 1.5 before, with email working ok. I left the email settings intact, using MS online services. The settings are - Mail server: Smtp.mail.microsoftonline.com Port: 587 [checked] Use TLS for authentication I now get this error - [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] 2011-06-10 14:05:11,532 - ERROR - Error sending e-mail notification with subject 'Review Request: Test diff' on behalf of '*** sender removed ***' to '*** email addresses removed ***') [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] Traceback (most recent call last): [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File /usr/lib/python2.4/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/notifications/ email.py, line 236, in send_review_mail [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] message.send() [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File /usr/lib/python2.4/site- packages/Django-1.3-py2.4.egg/django/core/mail/message.py, line 251, in send [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] return self.get_connection(fail_silently).send_messages([self]) [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File /usr/lib/python2.4/site- packages/Django-1.3-py2.4.egg/django/core/mail/backends/smtp.py, line 86, in send_messages [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] sent = self._send(message) [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File /usr/lib/python2.4/site- packages/Django-1.3-py2.4.egg/django/core/mail/backends/smtp.py, line 104, in _send [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] email_message.message().as_string()) [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File /usr/lib64/python2.4/ smtplib.py, line 679, in sendmail [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] self.rset() [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File /usr/lib64/python2.4/ smtplib.py, line 449, in rset [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] return self.docmd(rset) [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File /usr/lib64/python2.4/ smtplib.py, line 374, in docmd [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] return self.getreply() [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File /usr/lib64/python2.4/ smtplib.py, line 348, in getreply [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] line = self.file.readline() [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File /usr/lib64/python2.4/ smtplib.py, line 160, in readline [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] chr = self.sslobj.read(1) [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] sslerror: (8, 'EOF occurred in violation of protocol') Any thoughts? I tried this by posting a review from an old diff that was in the database from 1.5. And I also submitted a new diff report and got the same error. Thanks, Daryl -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Error in installing Review Board
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:29 PM, ROAAN rohan.raiza...@gmail.com wrote: Jan, Yes I have been following the exact sequence of steps outlined there. Actually, I have read it so many times that its memorized to me :-). Anyhow, one thing which I think might be causing the issue is that I am having easy_install-2.6, easy_install-2.5. Since the python version I am using is 2.6.1 so I tried installing using easy_install-2.6. The error trace that I posted above has the first warning as warning: GMP library not found; Not building Crypto.PublicKey._fastmath, but I checked that is installed on my system as well. I am not sure about if i need to set up a path for it / some sort of link for my python environment to be aware about it. Following exact instruction when You use so old operating system does not have chance to work. You must improvise. Enter error message at Google and try resolve the problem - then one more time run easy_install and so on, and so on. This was not be easy - but I installed ReviewBoard on so freaky Linux Distrubution I belive it is possible everywhere if You are ready to compile half of operating system from the source code - really. Worked for me. Good Luck :) Jan Thanks, Rohan. On Jun 10, 10:09 am, Jan Koprowski jan.koprow...@gmail.com wrote: Rohan, Did You read and try:http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.5/admin/installation/linux/? Regards, On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:35 PM, ROAAN rohan.raiza...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am using Python 2.6 which i suppose should be fine and should not conflict with the issues of using Python 2.4. Rohan. On Jun 9, 5:37 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: I should point out (we'll make an official announcement when the time comes, though it'll be a while) that RB 1.6 is likely going to be the last release to support Python 2.4. Django has a Python deprecation schedule that we'll be following. So ideally, people should make sure they can use newer versions of Python. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Jan Koprowski jan.koprow...@gmail.comwrote: Stephen, If You can run Python 2.4 - this is not the case because of really nice setup.py maintaining all necessary Python dependencies. VirtualEnv solve almost all problems - only incompatible with mod_wsgi Apache could be a problem. Sometimes You must run something on very old machine and upgrading it is not the case because sometimes you are not owner of machine :) Regards, On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 06:42 -0700, ROAAN wrote: Hi, I am installing ReviewBoard on my machine running Fedora 10. I seem to It's worth noting that Fedora 10 was declared end-of-life almost two years ago, so you're probably going to run into difficulty installing ANY new software on it. It would be prudent to upgrade to a supported operating system like Fedora 14 or 15, or move to a long-term supported release like Red Hat Enterprise Linux or CentOS. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Jan Koprowski -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Jan Koprowski -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Jan Koprowski -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate
Re: Basic Workflow
Jeb, We faced the same and have come to a manual workaround. We organize around SCRs (Software Change Requests), with one review per SCR. This leads to a complication in that each review can have multiple revisions (since an SCR can have multiple changesets) and multiple files per revision. Here's an example of our workflow. The example assumes 1 submitter (the developer) and 2 reviewers since that's the way it is for us. Also it has 2 revisions because there were two changesets submitted by the author. Revision 1 has changes to fileA and fileB, and Revision 2 has changes to fileA and fileC. - Submitter creates a review - Reviewer1 goes to the diffs tab, selects Revision 1 - He reviews fileA and finds no faults. He adds a single comment OK file at the first visible line. This isn't necessarily the first line of the file since RB displays the first diff +- context lines. - He reviews fileB and puts a comment in one of the diffs. He does not put OK file in this case. - He changes to Revision2 and finds all files to be ok so he puts OK file against each file there. - Reviewer2 goes to Revision1 and reviews fileA. He finds no problems and also places an OK File in the first visible line. Now anyone can tell that file has been reviewed since it has a 2 when it is viewed in the diff file. - He reviews fileB and if he finds no additional comments, puts an OK file . - He reviews Revision2 and also finds everything ok there too. - Submitter responds to the comment in File A - Reviewer1 goes into FileA and assuming he agrees with the submitter, puts an OK against the comment. - Now, since there are no unanswered comments in FileA, Reviwer1 also puts an OK file in the first visible line in the file. In short, 2 OK files at the top of each file indicates the file review is complete. When all files in all revisions have a 2, the review can be closed. There are complications and nuisances using this method but with people willing to work around them it works ok. Clearly it would be much better to have UI and automated support from RB but it is what it is. John On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Jeb jebbe...@gmail.com wrote: I've read the docs and looked out on the web and haven't really found enough on this subject to satisfy me. Using RB seems pretty simple. Someone creates a review request. I review it. We iterate over the review, having these nice threaded discussions. Code is changed or not, finally it is submitted and closed. The tough part for me is knowing exactly when I've got work to do. 1. Bob creates a review 2. I respond to it asking for clarification on a few things 3. Bob responds How do I know Bob responded? Email - that's not enough for me, I don't rely on email to keep track of workflow issues like that New Comments Icon - what happens when I click the review and then mess with it -- that icon is gone and now it looks like any other review I just wish I could have some custom status or something where I could do the review, hit publish, then change it to awaiting coder feedback or something and have it show up in the submitter's incoming list. I'm sure I'm missing something, and I apologize for wasting anyone's time with this, but I could really use some help. Jeb -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- John blog: http://arrizza.blogspot.com/ web: http://www.arrizza.com/ -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: post-reviews: The requested URL could not be retrieved
Yes, I am using the full server path name with http://
We do have a proxy server, but both the requester and target are
within the proxy server.
On Jun 10, 11:29 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Are you using a full server path starting with http:// ? Are you
behind a proxy server?
Christian
On Friday, June 10, 2011, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tucker,
Thanks for the reply.
I ran nslookup server_name from both server_name (XP server) and
from a sparc-solaris2.10 machine.
Both return
Name: server_name.domain
Address: ip_address
On Jun 10, 11:15 am, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote:
You appear to have a DNS problem:
Unable to determine IP address from host name for server_name.
What does nslookup server_name say?
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We've been trying to run post-review but have been running into a
requested URL could not be retrieved error
We're running:
ReviewBoard 1.5.5 on Windows XP
Python 2.5.x
Apache 2.2.x
Subversion 1.6.16, running on a sparc-solaris2.10
Here is the output after adding the --debug option:
--
post-review --server=server_name/rb_site --username= --
password= --revision-range=8325 --debug
RBTools 0.3.2
Home = C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data
svn info
diff --version
repository info: Path: svn-server/ParentPath/RepoName, Base pa
th: /trunk, Supports changesets: False
HTTP GETting api/
Got HTTP error: 503: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01
Transition
al//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd;
HTMLHEADMETA HTTP-EQUIV=Content-Type CONTENT=text/html;
charset=iso-8859
-1
TITLEERROR: The requested URL could not be retrieved/TITLE
STYLE type=text/css!--BODY{background-color:#ff;font-
family:verdana,san
s-serif}PRE{font-family:sans-serif}--/STYLE
/HEADBODY
H2The requested URL could not be retrieved/H2
HR noshade size=1px
P
While trying to retrieve the URL:
A HREF=server_name/rb_site/api/server_name/rb_site/api//
A
P
The following error was encountered:
BLOCKQUOTE
Unable to determine IP address from host name for
Iserver_name/I
/BLOCKQUOTE
P
The dnsserver returned:
BLOCKQUOTE
Name Error: The domain name does not exist.
/BLOCKQUOTE
P
This means that:
PRE
The cache was not able to resolve the hostname presented in the URL.
Check if the address is correct.
--
Thanks!
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today
athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group
athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
--tucker
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today
athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group
athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: post-reviews: The requested URL could not be retrieved
Does the error actually only list the hostname and not the fully
qualified name? If so, that may be part of your problem (throwing out
guesses). Have you tried using the fully qualified name?
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:22 AM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tucker,
Thanks for the reply.
I ran nslookup server_name from both server_name (XP server) and
from a sparc-solaris2.10 machine.
Both return
Name: server_name.domain
Address: ip_address
On Jun 10, 11:15 am, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote:
You appear to have a DNS problem:
Unable to determine IP address from host name for server_name.
What does nslookup server_name say?
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We've been trying to run post-review but have been running into a
requested URL could not be retrieved error
We're running:
ReviewBoard 1.5.5 on Windows XP
Python 2.5.x
Apache 2.2.x
Subversion 1.6.16, running on a sparc-solaris2.10
Here is the output after adding the --debug option:
--
post-review --server=server_name/rb_site --username= --
password= --revision-range=8325 --debug
RBTools 0.3.2
Home = C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data
svn info
diff --version
repository info: Path: svn-server/ParentPath/RepoName, Base pa
th: /trunk, Supports changesets: False
HTTP GETting api/
Got HTTP error: 503: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01
Transition
al//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd;
HTMLHEADMETA HTTP-EQUIV=Content-Type CONTENT=text/html;
charset=iso-8859
-1
TITLEERROR: The requested URL could not be retrieved/TITLE
STYLE type=text/css!--BODY{background-color:#ff;font-
family:verdana,san
s-serif}PRE{font-family:sans-serif}--/STYLE
/HEADBODY
H2The requested URL could not be retrieved/H2
HR noshade size=1px
P
While trying to retrieve the URL:
A HREF=server_name/rb_site/api/server_name/rb_site/api//
A
P
The following error was encountered:
BLOCKQUOTE
Unable to determine IP address from host name for
Iserver_name/I
/BLOCKQUOTE
P
The dnsserver returned:
BLOCKQUOTE
Name Error: The domain name does not exist.
/BLOCKQUOTE
P
This means that:
PRE
The cache was not able to resolve the hostname presented in the URL.
Check if the address is correct.
--
Thanks!
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today
athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group
athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
--tucker
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
--tucker
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: post-reviews: The requested URL could not be retrieved
Sorry for not listing all the output, but company policy prohibits me
from doing that.
Yes, the error lists the hostname and FQDN
Also, we do give it the FQDN following the --server option
On Jun 10, 2:56 pm, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote:
Does the error actually only list the hostname and not the fully
qualified name? If so, that may be part of your problem (throwing out
guesses). Have you tried using the fully qualified name?
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:22 AM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tucker,
Thanks for the reply.
I ran nslookup server_name from both server_name (XP server) and
from a sparc-solaris2.10 machine.
Both return
Name: server_name.domain
Address: ip_address
On Jun 10, 11:15 am, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote:
You appear to have a DNS problem:
Unable to determine IP address from host name for server_name.
What does nslookup server_name say?
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We've been trying to run post-review but have been running into a
requested URL could not be retrieved error
We're running:
ReviewBoard 1.5.5 on Windows XP
Python 2.5.x
Apache 2.2.x
Subversion 1.6.16, running on a sparc-solaris2.10
Here is the output after adding the --debug option:
--
post-review --server=server_name/rb_site --username= --
password= --revision-range=8325 --debug
RBTools 0.3.2
Home = C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data
svn info
diff --version
repository info: Path: svn-server/ParentPath/RepoName, Base pa
th: /trunk, Supports changesets: False
HTTP GETting api/
Got HTTP error: 503: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01
Transition
al//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd;
HTMLHEADMETA HTTP-EQUIV=Content-Type CONTENT=text/html;
charset=iso-8859
-1
TITLEERROR: The requested URL could not be retrieved/TITLE
STYLE type=text/css!--BODY{background-color:#ff;font-
family:verdana,san
s-serif}PRE{font-family:sans-serif}--/STYLE
/HEADBODY
H2The requested URL could not be retrieved/H2
HR noshade size=1px
P
While trying to retrieve the URL:
A HREF=server_name/rb_site/api/server_name/rb_site/api//
A
P
The following error was encountered:
BLOCKQUOTE
Unable to determine IP address from host name for
Iserver_name/I
/BLOCKQUOTE
P
The dnsserver returned:
BLOCKQUOTE
Name Error: The domain name does not exist.
/BLOCKQUOTE
P
This means that:
PRE
The cache was not able to resolve the hostname presented in the URL.
Check if the address is correct.
--
Thanks!
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today
athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group
athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
--tucker
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today
athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group
athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
--tucker
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: post-reviews: The requested URL could not be retrieved
We've seen people run into this sort of error with proxy servers. Regardless
of your client-side proxy server configuration (say, in your Internet
settings, on Windows), it may still use the proxy server on post-review.
The error output looks very much like it came from a proxy server, meaning
that the request is going out to the proxy, and the proxy can't find the
domain. You'll need to blacklist it. I don't recall if it will at all
respect this black list with Python running on Windows. If it's Linux, then
you want to be sure your http_proxy environment variable isn't set.
This has come up a couple of times, and it's clear we need a setting in
post-review itself to just override the proxy configuration.
If you search on this mailing list, you'll probably find a couple other
solutions.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:55 PM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for not listing all the output, but company policy prohibits me
from doing that.
Yes, the error lists the hostname and FQDN
Also, we do give it the FQDN following the --server option
On Jun 10, 2:56 pm, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote:
Does the error actually only list the hostname and not the fully
qualified name? If so, that may be part of your problem (throwing out
guesses). Have you tried using the fully qualified name?
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:22 AM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tucker,
Thanks for the reply.
I ran nslookup server_name from both server_name (XP server) and
from a sparc-solaris2.10 machine.
Both return
Name: server_name.domain
Address: ip_address
On Jun 10, 11:15 am, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote:
You appear to have a DNS problem:
Unable to determine IP address from host name for server_name.
What does nslookup server_name say?
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We've been trying to run post-review but have been running into a
requested URL could not be retrieved error
We're running:
ReviewBoard 1.5.5 on Windows XP
Python 2.5.x
Apache 2.2.x
Subversion 1.6.16, running on a sparc-solaris2.10
Here is the output after adding the --debug option:
--
post-review --server=server_name/rb_site --username= --
password= --revision-range=8325 --debug
RBTools 0.3.2
Home = C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data
svn info
diff --version
repository info: Path: svn-server/ParentPath/RepoName, Base
pa
th: /trunk, Supports changesets: False
HTTP GETting api/
Got HTTP error: 503: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01
Transition
al//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd;
HTMLHEADMETA HTTP-EQUIV=Content-Type CONTENT=text/html;
charset=iso-8859
-1
TITLEERROR: The requested URL could not be retrieved/TITLE
STYLE type=text/css!--BODY{background-color:#ff;font-
family:verdana,san
s-serif}PRE{font-family:sans-serif}--/STYLE
/HEADBODY
H2The requested URL could not be retrieved/H2
HR noshade size=1px
P
While trying to retrieve the URL:
A
HREF=server_name/rb_site/api/server_name/rb_site/api//
A
P
The following error was encountered:
BLOCKQUOTE
Unable to determine IP address from host name for
Iserver_name/I
/BLOCKQUOTE
P
The dnsserver returned:
BLOCKQUOTE
Name Error: The domain name does not exist.
/BLOCKQUOTE
P
This means that:
PRE
The cache was not able to resolve the hostname presented in the URL.
Check if the address is correct.
--
Thanks!
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp://
www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group athttp://
groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
--tucker
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp://
www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group athttp://
groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
--tucker
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user?
Re: post-reviews: The requested URL could not be retrieved
Ah, so would setting the environment variable in the command prompt
window do the trick?
On Jun 10, 4:32 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
We've seen people run into this sort of error with proxy servers. Regardless
of your client-side proxy server configuration (say, in your Internet
settings, on Windows), it may still use the proxy server on post-review.
The error output looks very much like it came from a proxy server, meaning
that the request is going out to the proxy, and the proxy can't find the
domain. You'll need to blacklist it. I don't recall if it will at all
respect this black list with Python running on Windows. If it's Linux, then
you want to be sure your http_proxy environment variable isn't set.
This has come up a couple of times, and it's clear we need a setting in
post-review itself to just override the proxy configuration.
If you search on this mailing list, you'll probably find a couple other
solutions.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:55 PM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for not listing all the output, but company policy prohibits me
from doing that.
Yes, the error lists the hostname and FQDN
Also, we do give it the FQDN following the --server option
On Jun 10, 2:56 pm, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote:
Does the error actually only list the hostname and not the fully
qualified name? If so, that may be part of your problem (throwing out
guesses). Have you tried using the fully qualified name?
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:22 AM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tucker,
Thanks for the reply.
I ran nslookup server_name from both server_name (XP server) and
from a sparc-solaris2.10 machine.
Both return
Name: server_name.domain
Address: ip_address
On Jun 10, 11:15 am, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote:
You appear to have a DNS problem:
Unable to determine IP address from host name for server_name.
What does nslookup server_name say?
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We've been trying to run post-review but have been running into a
requested URL could not be retrieved error
We're running:
ReviewBoard 1.5.5 on Windows XP
Python 2.5.x
Apache 2.2.x
Subversion 1.6.16, running on a sparc-solaris2.10
Here is the output after adding the --debug option:
--
post-review --server=server_name/rb_site --username= --
password= --revision-range=8325 --debug
RBTools 0.3.2
Home = C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data
svn info
diff --version
repository info: Path: svn-server/ParentPath/RepoName, Base
pa
th: /trunk, Supports changesets: False
HTTP GETting api/
Got HTTP error: 503: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01
Transition
al//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd;
HTMLHEADMETA HTTP-EQUIV=Content-Type CONTENT=text/html;
charset=iso-8859
-1
TITLEERROR: The requested URL could not be retrieved/TITLE
STYLE type=text/css!--BODY{background-color:#ff;font-
family:verdana,san
s-serif}PRE{font-family:sans-serif}--/STYLE
/HEADBODY
H2The requested URL could not be retrieved/H2
HR noshade size=1px
P
While trying to retrieve the URL:
A
HREF=server_name/rb_site/api/server_name/rb_site/api//
A
P
The following error was encountered:
BLOCKQUOTE
Unable to determine IP address from host name for
Iserver_name/I
/BLOCKQUOTE
P
The dnsserver returned:
BLOCKQUOTE
Name Error: The domain name does not exist.
/BLOCKQUOTE
P
This means that:
PRE
The cache was not able to resolve the hostname presented in the URL.
Check if the address is correct.
--
Thanks!
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp://
www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group athttp://
groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
--tucker
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp://
www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Re: post-reviews: The requested URL could not be retrieved
I know at least on Linux, the http_proxy variable is respected. I don't know
about on Windows. A common problem on Linux is that people will have that
set, in order for other things to work correctly, and then post-review will
pick it up. Some people use an alias or wrapper so that doesn't happen.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:51 PM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, so would setting the environment variable in the command prompt
window do the trick?
On Jun 10, 4:32 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
We've seen people run into this sort of error with proxy servers.
Regardless
of your client-side proxy server configuration (say, in your Internet
settings, on Windows), it may still use the proxy server on post-review.
The error output looks very much like it came from a proxy server,
meaning
that the request is going out to the proxy, and the proxy can't find the
domain. You'll need to blacklist it. I don't recall if it will at all
respect this black list with Python running on Windows. If it's Linux,
then
you want to be sure your http_proxy environment variable isn't set.
This has come up a couple of times, and it's clear we need a setting in
post-review itself to just override the proxy configuration.
If you search on this mailing list, you'll probably find a couple other
solutions.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:55 PM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for not listing all the output, but company policy prohibits me
from doing that.
Yes, the error lists the hostname and FQDN
Also, we do give it the FQDN following the --server option
On Jun 10, 2:56 pm, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote:
Does the error actually only list the hostname and not the fully
qualified name? If so, that may be part of your problem (throwing
out
guesses). Have you tried using the fully qualified name?
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:22 AM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tucker,
Thanks for the reply.
I ran nslookup server_name from both server_name (XP server)
and
from a sparc-solaris2.10 machine.
Both return
Name: server_name.domain
Address: ip_address
On Jun 10, 11:15 am, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote:
You appear to have a DNS problem:
Unable to determine IP address from host name for server_name.
What does nslookup server_name say?
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
We've been trying to run post-review but have been running into
a
requested URL could not be retrieved error
We're running:
ReviewBoard 1.5.5 on Windows XP
Python 2.5.x
Apache 2.2.x
Subversion 1.6.16, running on a sparc-solaris2.10
Here is the output after adding the --debug option:
--
post-review --server=server_name/rb_site --username= --
password= --revision-range=8325 --debug
RBTools 0.3.2
Home = C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data
svn info
diff --version
repository info: Path: svn-server/ParentPath/RepoName,
Base
pa
th: /trunk, Supports changesets: False
HTTP GETting api/
Got HTTP error: 503: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML
4.01
Transition
al//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd;
HTMLHEADMETA HTTP-EQUIV=Content-Type CONTENT=text/html;
charset=iso-8859
-1
TITLEERROR: The requested URL could not be retrieved/TITLE
STYLE type=text/css!--BODY{background-color:#ff;font-
family:verdana,san
s-serif}PRE{font-family:sans-serif}--/STYLE
/HEADBODY
H2The requested URL could not be retrieved/H2
HR noshade size=1px
P
While trying to retrieve the URL:
A
HREF=server_name/rb_site/api/server_name/rb_site/api//
A
P
The following error was encountered:
BLOCKQUOTE
Unable to determine IP address from host name for
Iserver_name/I
/BLOCKQUOTE
P
The dnsserver returned:
BLOCKQUOTE
Name Error: The domain name does not exist.
/BLOCKQUOTE
P
This means that:
PRE
The cache was not able to resolve the hostname presented in the
URL.
Check if the address is correct.
--
Thanks!
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp://
www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Re: post-reviews: The requested URL could not be retrieved
Sorry Chrisitan, never mind, I misread your post. I'll do some more
digging for overriding the proxy configuration
On Jun 10, 4:51 pm, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, so would setting the environment variable in the command prompt
window do the trick?
On Jun 10, 4:32 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
We've seen people run into this sort of error with proxy servers. Regardless
of your client-side proxy server configuration (say, in your Internet
settings, on Windows), it may still use the proxy server on post-review.
The error output looks very much like it came from a proxy server, meaning
that the request is going out to the proxy, and the proxy can't find the
domain. You'll need to blacklist it. I don't recall if it will at all
respect this black list with Python running on Windows. If it's Linux, then
you want to be sure your http_proxy environment variable isn't set.
This has come up a couple of times, and it's clear we need a setting in
post-review itself to just override the proxy configuration.
If you search on this mailing list, you'll probably find a couple other
solutions.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:55 PM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for not listing all the output, but company policy prohibits me
from doing that.
Yes, the error lists the hostname and FQDN
Also, we do give it the FQDN following the --server option
On Jun 10, 2:56 pm, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote:
Does the error actually only list the hostname and not the fully
qualified name? If so, that may be part of your problem (throwing out
guesses). Have you tried using the fully qualified name?
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:22 AM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tucker,
Thanks for the reply.
I ran nslookup server_name from both server_name (XP server) and
from a sparc-solaris2.10 machine.
Both return
Name: server_name.domain
Address: ip_address
On Jun 10, 11:15 am, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote:
You appear to have a DNS problem:
Unable to determine IP address from host name for server_name.
What does nslookup server_name say?
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We've been trying to run post-review but have been running into a
requested URL could not be retrieved error
We're running:
ReviewBoard 1.5.5 on Windows XP
Python 2.5.x
Apache 2.2.x
Subversion 1.6.16, running on a sparc-solaris2.10
Here is the output after adding the --debug option:
--
post-review --server=server_name/rb_site --username= --
password= --revision-range=8325 --debug
RBTools 0.3.2
Home = C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data
svn info
diff --version
repository info: Path: svn-server/ParentPath/RepoName,
Base
pa
th: /trunk, Supports changesets: False
HTTP GETting api/
Got HTTP error: 503: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML
4.01
Transition
al//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd;
HTMLHEADMETA HTTP-EQUIV=Content-Type CONTENT=text/html;
charset=iso-8859
-1
TITLEERROR: The requested URL could not be retrieved/TITLE
STYLE type=text/css!--BODY{background-color:#ff;font-
family:verdana,san
s-serif}PRE{font-family:sans-serif}--/STYLE
/HEADBODY
H2The requested URL could not be retrieved/H2
HR noshade size=1px
P
While trying to retrieve the URL:
A
HREF=server_name/rb_site/api/server_name/rb_site/api//
A
P
The following error was encountered:
BLOCKQUOTE
Unable to determine IP address from host name for
Iserver_name/I
/BLOCKQUOTE
P
The dnsserver returned:
BLOCKQUOTE
Name Error: The domain name does not exist.
/BLOCKQUOTE
P
This means that:
PRE
The cache was not able to resolve the hostname presented in the
URL.
Check if the address is correct.
--
Thanks!
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp://
www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group athttp://
groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
--tucker
--
Re: 1.6 beta 2 - email EOF error
This is interesting. First, when I tried removing the Sender e-mail address, after clicking Save the default noreply came back. And I got the same error both with noreply and when using the codereviews@ internal email I created (that was working before). I also tried modifying the code in email.py to set sender to None regardless. Same result. But then I found out we have an internal mail server. And it works when pointing at that. It works both with the default noreply sender and the codereviews@ email. So there's something unique to the MS online mail. Now if I could just get my sqlite3 database to convert to mysql. :) But that will be another (long) post. Thanks for the response, Daryl On Jun 10, 2:56 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hi Daryl, The only thing I know has changed on our end is the addition of a Sender: header. It shouldn't break anything, but perhaps they're strict and disconnect you early. I don't know what has changed in Django, but maybe something broke there. To rule out Review Board as the cause, go into Admin UI - Settings - E-mail and remove the Sender e-mail address. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Daryl darylnebr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I just upgraded to 1.6 beta 2 porting my database over. I was using 1.5 before, with email working ok. I left the email settings intact, using MS online services. The settings are - Mail server: Smtp.mail.microsoftonline.com Port: 587 [checked] Use TLS for authentication I now get this error - [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] 2011-06-10 14:05:11,532 - ERROR - Error sending e-mail notification with subject 'Review Request: Test diff' on behalf of '*** sender removed ***' to '*** email addresses removed ***') [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] Traceback (most recent call last): [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File /usr/lib/python2.4/site- packages/ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/notifications/ email.py, line 236, in send_review_mail [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] message.send() [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File /usr/lib/python2.4/site- packages/Django-1.3-py2.4.egg/django/core/mail/message.py, line 251, in send [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] return self.get_connection(fail_silently).send_messages([self]) [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File /usr/lib/python2.4/site- packages/Django-1.3-py2.4.egg/django/core/mail/backends/smtp.py, line 86, in send_messages [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] sent = self._send(message) [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File /usr/lib/python2.4/site- packages/Django-1.3-py2.4.egg/django/core/mail/backends/smtp.py, line 104, in _send [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] email_message.message().as_string()) [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File /usr/lib64/python2.4/ smtplib.py, line 679, in sendmail [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] self.rset() [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File /usr/lib64/python2.4/ smtplib.py, line 449, in rset [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] return self.docmd(rset) [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File /usr/lib64/python2.4/ smtplib.py, line 374, in docmd [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] return self.getreply() [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File /usr/lib64/python2.4/ smtplib.py, line 348, in getreply [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] line = self.file.readline() [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File /usr/lib64/python2.4/ smtplib.py, line 160, in readline [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] chr = self.sslobj.read(1) [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] sslerror: (8, 'EOF occurred in violation of protocol') Any thoughts? I tried this by posting a review from an old diff that was in the database from 1.5. And I also submitted a new diff report and got the same error. Thanks, Daryl -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Issue 2133 in reviewboard: chrome 12 scrolls backwards in diff viewer
Comment #1 on issue 2133 by mattginz...@gmail.com: chrome 12 scrolls backwards in diff viewer http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2133 I upgraded from Chrome 11 to 12 on another host (also Mac OS X 10.6.7) and see exactly the same result. Reproducible for me at least. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2101 in reviewboard: Files changed links don't work with Google Chrome 12.0.742.53
Comment #3 on issue 2101 by lauren...@gmail.com: Files changed links don't work with Google Chrome 12.0.742.53 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2101 Version 13.0.782.13 in the dev channel fixes this I usually don't install those dev builds. Do you think it'll be in the regular beta build soon? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2101 in reviewboard: Files changed links don't work with Google Chrome 12.0.742.53
Comment #4 on issue 2101 by mattginz...@gmail.com: Files changed links don't work with Google Chrome 12.0.742.53 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2101 Thanks. Do you have a bug link at chrome/chromium to reference? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Issue 2135 in reviewboard: clearcase.py failing on CentOS 5 (Python 2.4)
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2135 by yos...@hotmail.com: clearcase.py failing on CentOS 5 (Python 2.4) http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2135 * NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. * * If you need immediate support, please contact* * reviewbo...@googlegroups.com * What version are you running? 1.6beta2 What's the URL of the page containing the problem? Anything that calls clearcase.py via /r/new with a clearcase diff What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Create a clearcase review request with diff uploaded using RBtools 2. Must have Python 2.4 on the server (CentOS 5) What is the expected output? What do you see instead? Expect to see diff uploaded. Failed with the following error: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.3-py2.4.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py, line 111, in get_response response = callback(request, *callback_args, **callback_kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Djblets-0.6.7-py2.4.egg/djblets/auth/util.py, line 46, in _checklogin return view_func(request, *args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/reviews/views.py, line 248, in new_review_request local_site=local_site) File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/reviews/forms.py, line 234, in create attach_to_history=True) File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/reviews/forms.py, line 286, in create history) File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/forms.py, line 62, in create files = list(self._process_files( File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/forms.py, line 136, in _process_files for f in tool.get_parser(file.read()).parse(): File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/parser.py, line 49, in parse next_linenum, new_file = self.parse_change_header(i) File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/parser.py, line 75, in parse_change_header linenum = self.parse_diff_header(linenum, info) File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/clearcase.py, line 206, in parse_diff_header info['origFile'] = self._oid2filename(m.group(1)) File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/clearcase.py, line 245, in _oid2filename return os.path.relpath(res, self.repopath) AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'relpath' What operating system are you using? What browser? CentOS 5 Please provide any additional information below. This is due to Python 2.4 not supporting the relpath method However, the admin page for RB 1.6beta2 says 2.4 is supported: “It’s also assumed that you have Python v2.4 or v2.5 installed” http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/linux/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2134 in reviewboard: Diff breaks the review board.
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #1 on issue 2134 by trowb...@gmail.com: Diff breaks the review board. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2134 How did you create your diff? How did you create the review request? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
