I have a script now that can simulate various database upgrade scenarios,
and have spent lots of time with it now. I've yet to be able to reproduce
this. I've tried sqlite and MySQL, Python versions 2.4 through 2.6, and
various combinations of Review Board versions.
I am curious about the Hinted
I don't quite think I'm groking your request. You want screen caps of
Home › Django_evolution › Versions › Hinted version, updated on
2011-06-30 20:16:00 and Home › Django_evolution › Versions › Stored
version, updated on 2011-06-30 20:16:00? I just looked at those and
they look rather
I just upgraded from 1.6RC1 to 1.6RC2 and when I ran rb-site upgrade, I got
the following output:
Rebuilding directory structure
Updating database. This may take a while.
Creating tables ...
Upgrading Review Board from 1.6 RC1 to 1.6 RC2
There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer.
Installing
For the screenshots, I was interested in a field that it turns out isn't
shown in the admin UI. So nevermind on that.
Feel free to send the raw dumps to me directly. They don't contain any
identifying information, just database table schema data, but no need to
attach them publicly either.
Hi Joe,
Nothing in there looks problematic to me. What concerned you? Just things
like No fixtures found and There are unapplied evolutions?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Fri, Jul 29,
Specifically There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. It
appeared in a red color which made me think it might be a problem.
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Hi Joe,
Nothing in there looks problematic to me. What concerned you? Just things
Yeah, that's just a third-party thing. At that point in the process, we've
done a database sync, and we found out that an evolution needed to be
applied. The Evolutions were successful below indicates that when we got
to that point in the process, it went fine.
Maybe I can get a patch in to
Updates:
Status: PendingReview
Owner: chip...@gmail.com
Comment #1 on issue 2195 by chip...@gmail.com: Perforce support is broken
with Python 2.4 in RC2
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2195
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this
Updates:
Owner: chip...@gmail.com
Comment #9 on issue 2154 by chip...@gmail.com: Published comments include
every edited version instead of the latest one.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2154
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this
Updates:
Labels: -Milestone-Release1.6 Milestone-Release1.6.x
Comment #7 on issue 2002 by chip...@gmail.com: linkified URL has succeeding
parenthesis included in link's target URL
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2002
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
Comment #5 on issue 2186 by chip...@gmail.com: Upgrading site on 1.6 RC2
gives evolution errors
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2186
I have spent a considerable amount of time on this and can't find anything
on our end that could cause it. I have a new script that can
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2199 by faller.g...@gmail.com: Perforce connection is broken in
case of using a password 1.6rc2
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2199
* NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. *
Comment #2 on issue 2195 by greg.es...@gmail.com: Perforce support is
broken with Python 2.4 in RC2
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2195
I think this issue may be what is causing the following error when I try to
bring up the add repository page.
=
[[ stack
Comment #3 on issue 2195 by chip...@gmail.com: Perforce support is broken
with Python 2.4 in RC2
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2195
Tonight's nightly build will have the fix.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
14 matches
Mail list logo
