What values?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 12:06 AM, jack jack wrote:
> I am seeing this issue where the values are not getting populated if the
> compatibility mode
Hi Sam,
This sounds like another instance of the database not being utf-8. We
operate almost entirely in utf-8, and the database needs to be able to store
that. The reviews_review table is the cause for this error, but you'll
likely hit it again and again with more tables unless the entire databas
Hmm hard to say. Sounds like a very round-about way of doing things. I
believe there were some transformations we made during evolution time to the
data in 1.6. Have you hit any problems yet?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, I
Hi Gyanesh,
The new issue tracking feature is intended as a way to speed up the review
process. Typically, when a reviewer found something that needed to be
changed, they would make a comment and say what the problem was. The
developer would then generally reply with "Fixed" or "Done" or something
Hi Phil,
It looks like your path to the Review Board server is configured wrong. It
looks like you've installed RB in a subdirectory install, but your
repository is pointing to the root of the server and not the subdirectory.
If you're using the reviewboard:url SVN property, try setting it to
htt
I got it to work in my personal laptop,
I should note that you also need to change the settings file.
/var/www/reviewboard/conf/settings_local.py
You need to change SITE_ROOT from '/' to '/review/'(depends on the chosen
sub directory)
I also added reverse proxying so it could work with Bugzilla.
I
Hi Robert,
Sorry I didn't get to this sooner, but you're correct. It's a virtual line
number that is based on the generated diff using our specific algorithm. We
use virtual line numbers rather than real numbers because real numbers
wouldn't necessarily make sense depending on how you generate the
I've installed the RB 1.6.1 on my Windows 7 machine, with Apache 2.2
and mod_python, for use with our company's Subversion repository.
(Many thanks to David Ball for his excellent braindump on installing
RB on Windows!) The RB Admin site works fine (able to set up users,
review groups etc.).
Howev
Installing RB for the first time today. I ran into problems when
trying to comment on code lines using Chines; it would show up as
question marks after I published it. I made a quick fix by changing
the text column of a reviews_comment table to be utf8_general_ci
collation in the database. I notice
Hi,
I am using RB 1.6, RBTools: 3.4 on RHEL
I think the I didn't check the documentation in detail, before writing
this email.
I checked the documentation at
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/users/reviews/issue-tracking/
It says, "By default, Open an issue is checked for new comments."
I've tried to understand how this mapping is perfomed and came up with the
following description/example. Can anyone confirm that I got it right?
Thanks.
ReviewBoard diff comments are mapped to the virtual diff table which is
shown in the web interface, not to a location in the old or new fil
Hi,
I need some more info on when does a reviewer tick this "Issue" check
box? How is different from any other comment where this is not ticked?
Is there any special meaning to it? The only difference I see when
this is selected is that comment is shown little differently.
PS: Curious on this as
12 matches
Mail list logo
