Failed to get repository information.
Hi Chris, I am getting following error in /etc/httpd/logs, while adding repository into reviewboard. Its https repository path.Reviewboard UI doesn't ask for certificate. It is subversion repository. *ERROR:root:SVN: Failed to get repository information*. Thnak you, Shilpa -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Failed to get repository information.
Hi Shilpa, I know you sent some IMs last night, but it was 3-5AM here. In the future, support requests without a support contract should remain on the mailing list. I don't know enough about your deployment to answer any questions. What version of Review Board are you using? Is your data/ directory and everything in it writable by your web server? Can you do some inspection on your site's data/.subversion/ directory and see if it has a cert file for your repository? What happens if you do a svn info on the repository path (exact same one you entered in the Admin UI) as a user on that server? How does the ~/.subversion directory compare? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:44 AM, shilpageo shilpa.anan...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Chris, I am getting following error in /etc/httpd/logs, while adding repository into reviewboard. Its https repository path.Reviewboard UI doesn't ask for certificate. It is subversion repository. *ERROR:root:SVN: Failed to get repository information*. Thnak you, Shilpa -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Unable to create site through rb-site
It doesn't look like you have a valid Review Board install. How did you install it? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 5:44 AM, Ramakrishna nisarga...@gmail.com wrote: I have installed ReviewBoard 1.6 on Ubuntu 11.04. I am unable to create site through rb-site. $ sudo rb-site install /var/www/reviewboard Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/bin/rb-site, line 5, in module from pkg_resources import load_entry_point File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 2671, in module working_set.require(__requires__) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 654, in require needed = self.resolve(parse_requirements(requirements)) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 552, in resolve raise DistributionNotFound(req) Please let me know the issue. Thanks a lot... -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: MySQL vs SQLite
Hi Nelson, If you only plan to ever have one user using Review Board, SQLite is fine. Beyond that, it doesn't scale. It's not meant to be a big database used by tens or hundreds or thousands of users. The way it handles locking, one write can lock the database and block everyone who wants to read. Every deployment we've seen that used SQLite has at one point realized the limitations and wanted to convert to something else, and that can be difficult. So, unless this is just a throw-away test deployment, I'd advise not bothering with SQLite. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Nelson Jones huawen@gmail.com wrote: Your documentation says While useful and portable, SQLite does not handle large loads with many concurrent users very well. We strongly recommend using MySQL or PostgreSQL for a real deployment. So does it mean that MySQL is a winner over SQLite for scalabilty and stalability? Is there a boundary say X TeraBytes? Or X PteraBytes? Any infomation or detail would be helpful. Thanks. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: post-review: entering username and password everytime
I think adding a note about ~/.post-review-cookies.txt to the post-review manual page would be helpful. I created a ticket: http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2342 -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
How can I install a specific reviewboard version
I want to install Reviewboard 1.0alpha4 Thanks Lynn -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Issue 2338 in reviewboard: post-review --revision-range does not work for clearcase
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2338 by drenna...@gmail.com: post-review --revision-range does
not work for clearcase
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2338
* NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. *
* If you need immediate support, please contact*
* reviewbo...@googlegroups.com *
What version are you running?
RBTools 0.3.4
What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
n/a
What steps will reproduce the problem?
..try with a single revision..
post-review
--revision-range=/vobs/foo/test.py@@/main/mydev/2:/vobs/foo/test.py@@/main/mydev/3
--output-diff
...or multiple revisions..
post-review
--revision-range=/vobs/foo/test.py@@/main/mydev/2:/vobs/foo/test.py@@/main/mydev/3;/vobs/foo/test2.py@@/main/mydev/1:/vobs/foo/test2.py@@/main/mydev/3
--output-diff
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Instead of the diffs being generated I get an error saying
There don't seem to be any diffs!
What operating system are you using? What browser?
Centos 5
Please provide any additional information below.
The problem is the diff_between_revisions code in the ClearCaseClient.
According to the docs at
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/users/tools/post-review/ the
format of --revision-range should be STARTREV:ENDREV
However the code is splitting based on ';' not ':'
1485 def diff_between_revisions(self, revision_range, args,
repository_info):
1486 Performs a diff between passed revisions or branch.
1487
1488 # Convert revision range to list of:
1489 # (previous version, current version) tuples
1490 revision_range = revision_range.split(';')
1491 changeset = zip(revision_range[0::2], revision_range[1::2])
1492
1493 return (self.do_diff(changeset)[0], None)
The other thing is the docs don't mention how to format --revision-range
for more than one revision. Doing
--revision-range=fileAOLDREV:fileANEWREV:fileBOLDREV:fileBNEWREV works but
looks odd.
As a workaround for this bug I have to use ';' to separate the revisions..
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard-issues group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Issue 2339 in reviewboard: QPID-3532 Fix the blocking of JMS operations when failover happens
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2339 by alex.ruf...@gmail.com: QPID-3532 Fix the blocking of JMS operations when failover happens http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2339 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3532 describes some issues with non-blocking behaviour of 0-10 client failover. This patch makes the 0-10 client hold the failover mutex during the failover. It also alters the Address resolution code to allow resolving addresses after failover and adds some more failover tests (inc ADDR based ones). Additionally, it makes the failover process notify any waiters in the session to abort and let failover proceed as they would otherwise prevent the failover from occurring until they timed out after 60 seconds. This work does not go as far as we would like but still represents a functional improvement to failover. Additional improvements to the client locking model (such as an introduction a single connection lock) will require further iteration. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Issue 2340 in reviewboard: Reviewboard posts wrong Diff URL in notification emails
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2340 by goliat...@gmail.com: Reviewboard posts wrong Diff URL in notification emails http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2340 What version are you running? 1.6.1 What's the URL of the page containing the problem? http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-utils-devel/2011-October/000668.html What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Make sure, email notification for review requests is enabled 2. Create Review Request What is the expected output? What do you see instead? Reviewboard sends an Email to the configured address containing an url to a diff view. This URL reads: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102785/diff/diff which gives a 404 error. The URL should read http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102785/diff instead. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Issue 2341 in reviewboard: post-review doesn't handle multiple repositories based on the same vob (clearcase)
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2341 by drenna...@gmail.com: post-review doesn't handle multiple
repositories based on the same vob (clearcase)
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2341
What version are you running?
RBTools 0.3.4
What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
n/a
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Create 2 repositories A and B based on Clearcase (A followed by B).
Where A and B are based on the same vob however due to the project
configuration (Clearcase UCM) A and B are comprised of different components
found in the same vob.
2. Perform a post-review where the code is only accessible via B.
post-review --revision-range=..etc.. server=..etc..
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
I expected success, however what I got was..
Got API Error 207 (HTTP code 400): The file was not found in the
repository
Error data:
{'stat': 'fail', 'file': '/view/..etc..@@/main/blah/1', 'err':
{'msg': 'The file was not found in the repository', 'code':
207}, 'revision': '/main/blah/1'
What operating system are you using? What browser?
CentOS 5
Please provide any additional information below.
What I found is the code is picking the repository based on the vob uuid.
So in my case both repositories are a match base on vob uuid, so that's not
enough. It picked the first matching repository (A) when in fact B was the
one I needed to use.
I worked around this by introducing a --repository-name option which takes
the repository name as listed in the reviewboard ui.
--- a/postreview.py
+++ b/postreview.py
@@ -296,6 +296,10 @@ class ClearCaseRepositoryInfo(RepositoryInfo):
if not info or uuid != info['uuid']:
continue
+if options.repository_name and \
+ options.repository_name != repository['name']:
+continue
+
debug('Matching repository uuid:%s with path:%s' %(uuid,
info['repopath']))
return ClearCaseRepositoryInfo(info['repopath'],
@@ -3834,6 +3838,9 @@ def parse_options(args):
paths outside the view). For git, this
specifies
the origin url of the current repository,
overriding the origin url supplied by the git
client.)
+parser.add_option(--repository-name,
+ dest=repository_name, default=None,
+ help=the name for a repository for creating a
diff )
parser.add_option(-d, --debug,
action=store_true, dest=debug, default=DEBUG,
help=display debug output)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard-issues group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2340 in reviewboard: Reviewboard posts wrong Diff URL in notification emails
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #1 on issue 2340 by chip...@gmail.com: Reviewboard posts wrong Diff URL in notification emails http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2340 Hmm, we haven't noticed this in our deployments. We use Django to tell us the location of the diff, which should always be a valid path. Do you have any customizations of templates anywhere? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2322 in reviewboard: Unable to post reviews with post-review (0.3.4): can not log in into Reviewboard (1.6.1)
Comment #7 on issue 2322 by teki...@gmail.com: Unable to post reviews with post-review (0.3.4): can not log in into Reviewboard (1.6.1) http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2322 Workaround: copy the cookie from the browser. A script for OSX: #!/usr/bin/python import plistlib import os import time HOME=os.environ[HOME] COOKIES=plistlib.readPlist(HOME + /Library/Cookies/Cookies.plist) rbs = [x for x in COOKIES if x[Name] == rbsessionid] f = open(HOME + /.post-review-cookies.txt, w) f.write(# Netscape HTTP Cookie File # http://www.netscape.com/newsref/std/cookie_spec.html # This is a generated file! Do not edit. ) for rb in rbs: f.write(%s\tFALSE\t%s\tFALSE\t%d\t%s\t%s\n % (rb[Domain], rb[Path], int(time.mktime(rb[Expires].timetuple())), rb[Name], rb[Value])) f.close() -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
