回复： About multi languages(Chinese language)

Are you talking about Chinese characters in the code or in the description/comments? -David reply- I mean Chinese characters in the code . -- 原始邮件 -- 发件人: David Trowbridgetrowb...@gmail.com; 发送时间: 2012年2月7日(星期二) 下午2:01 收件人:

Auth issues

Version 1.6 My understanding of the authentication process was that if all other auth methods failed, review board would fall back to builtin, is this not correct then? I was attempting to login as as a local admin after having set up AD and received a TLS exception, the auth process did not

Using LDAP auth when anon access is not allowed?

We don't allow anonymous/unauthenticated queries against our LDAP service. Is it possible to set up RB 1.6.3 to use LDAP to authenticate users by having it try to bind with the users credentials? (or some other method I have not thought of?) -- Want to help the Review Board project?

Re: Auth issues

Hi Lev, I'll only be able to answer the first one. There are many users on here that know LDAP much better than I do. We've had reports in the past that LDAP/AD would block users from logging in with the builtin auth. I don't know why it does this, and have tried to hunt it down before, but

Re: Issue 2445 in reviewboard: Unable to 'View Diff' when using with RhodeCode for mercurial repositories

Comment #11 on issue 2445 by mikael.a...@gmail.com: Unable to 'View Diff' when using with RhodeCode for mercurial repositories http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2445 I think I'm having the same issue. When trying to patch file A I get the same message saying that patch

Issue 2478 in reviewboard: Web Service API 2.0 doesn't allow creating Review Group?

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2478 by eyuw...@gmail.com: Web Service API 2.0 doesn't allow creating Review Group? http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2478 * NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. * * If

Re: Issue 2478 in reviewboard: Web Service API 2.0 doesn't allow creating Review Group?

Comment #1 on issue 2478 by chip...@gmail.com: Web Service API 2.0 doesn't allow creating Review Group? http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2478 Try upgrading. It was added in a later release. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 2478 in reviewboard: Web Service API 2.0 doesn't allow creating Review Group?

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 2478 by trowb...@gmail.com: Web Service API 2.0 doesn't allow creating Review Group? http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2478 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are

Re: Issue 2478 in reviewboard: Web Service API 2.0 doesn't allow creating Review Group?

Comment #3 on issue 2478 by eyuw...@gmail.com: Web Service API 2.0 doesn't allow creating Review Group? http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2478 Great! Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to

Re: Issue 1671 in reviewboard: rbsessionid cookie prevents login when migrating to new server

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #1 on issue 1671 by trowb...@gmail.com: rbsessionid cookie prevents login when migrating to new server http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1671 I haven't experienced this in testing with modern djangos. -- You received this message

Re: Issue 1851 in reviewboard: Links for viewing interdiffs have incorrect URLs if you use them while viewing a draft

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 1851 by trowb...@gmail.com: Links for viewing interdiffs have incorrect URLs if you use them while viewing a draft http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1851 This hasn't been a problem in a long time. -- You received this

Re: Issue 1863 in reviewboard: Incorrect/Misleading error message from post-review CLI

Updates: Status: NotABug Comment #2 on issue 1863 by trowb...@gmail.com: Incorrect/Misleading error message from post-review CLI http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1863 This is an odd side-effect of the fact that it tries to use the default changeset. -- You

Re: Issue 2086 in reviewboard: postreview unhandled exception

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #1 on issue 2086 by trowb...@gmail.com: postreview unhandled exception http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2086 I think this is fixed in newer post-reviews -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 2092 in reviewboard: postreview does not upload diff

Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #3 on issue 2092 by trowb...@gmail.com: postreview does not upload diff http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2092 I'm not even sure what version of post-review this is filed against, nor how you're using it. Can you re-run with

Re: Issue 2105 in reviewboard: Publishing comments ignores edits when unpublished edits exist

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 2105 by trowb...@gmail.com: Publishing comments ignores edits when unpublished edits exist http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2105 This is fixed in newer 1.6 releases. -- You received this message because you are

Re: Issue 2176 in reviewboard: Diff parsing fails if extra tabs are detected

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #1 on issue 2176 by trowb...@gmail.com: Diff parsing fails if extra tabs are detected http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2176 Fixed in master (b65369c). Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Issue 2157 in reviewboard: Inner diff in draft generate 404 error

Comment #6 on issue 2157 by trowb...@gmail.com: Inner diff in draft generate 404 error http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2157 Huh. I get the same thing if I follow the same procedure as shown in the video (first look at r1, then look at the interdiff) -- You received

Re: Issue 2240 in reviewboard: Error while running the commad - post-review multitest.txt

Updates: Status: New Comment #3 on issue 2240 by trowb...@gmail.com: Error while running the commad - post-review multitest.txt http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2240 Unfortunately, clearcase support was a 3rd-party contribution and we don't have the expertise

Re: Issue 2315 in reviewboard: RBTools 0.3.4 is not backward compatible with Reviewboard 1.0.9

Updates: Status: New Comment #4 on issue 2315 by trowb...@gmail.com: RBTools 0.3.4 is not backward compatible with Reviewboard 1.0.9 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2315 Christian, this change was never published. Is it ready? -- You received this message

Re: Issue 2405 in reviewboard: review board cant show patches if HEAD is modified

Updates: Status: Incomplete Comment #2 on issue 2405 by trowb...@gmail.com: review board cant show patches if HEAD is modified http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2405 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: Issue 2406 in reviewboard: post-review

Updates: Status: Incomplete Comment #2 on issue 2406 by trowb...@gmail.com: post-review http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2406 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues

Re: Issue 2407 in reviewboard: Diff view issue when loading existing file diffs from mercurial

Updates: Status: Incomplete Comment #3 on issue 2407 by trowb...@gmail.com: Diff view issue when loading existing file diffs from mercurial http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2407 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you

Re: Issue 2418 in reviewboard: MultipleObjectsReturned: get() returned more than one LocalSiteProfile

Updates: Status: Incomplete Comment #3 on issue 2418 by trowb...@gmail.com: MultipleObjectsReturned: get() returned more than one LocalSiteProfile http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2418 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message