Re: Uploading new diff that contains a new file
Hi Christian, Thanks for the reply. I have now actually been able to upload new files with no problems. It turns out that the way I was generating the diff was causing the problem! I am not using post-review because I wanted to do some custom steps when people were submitting reviews. By using my own script I can ensure that what needs to be included in each review is included. Cheers, Darren On Apr 30, 7:24 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hi Darren, I'd recommend looking at our post-review tool and what it does for diffs. You'll need to copy its logic for this. Though, I'm curious why you're not just using post-review? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Darren Burke darren_bu...@yahoo.comwrote: Hi, I use clearcase to manage my code and want to upload a diff file to reviewboard that contains a new file. I use my own script to create new reviews and upload diff files but when I try to upload a diff that contains a new file I get the error The file was not found in the repository. Anyone know how to overcome this problem? I use the HTTP POST method to upload my diff files and this works fine for files that already exist in the repository so the problem is uniquely related to new files. What does reviewboard look for in the diff file to allow new files to be included? I guess I could hack the file to include this info to support my script. Thanks, Darren -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board 1.6.6 released
On Apr 30, 4:50 pm, Can Özmen canoz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Great work. I have a fresh 1.6.5 installed through BitNami on an EC2 instance. What's the upgrade procedure? Couldn't find it on the site or in the admin dashboard of the app. P.S. I have nothing in my install so I can wipe if necessary. For upgrading the BitNami installation you only need to take into account the path in which ReviewBoard is installed. According to the ReviewBoard official documentation the upgrade will involves two steps: 1.- Upgrade ReviewBoard with easy_install. Load the BitNami environment and execute: easy_install --prefix apps/reviewboard --script-dir apps/reviewboard/ bin --install-dir apps/reviewboard/lib -U ReviewBoard 2.- Upgrade your sites. The default site is created in /opt/bitnami/ apps/reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/bin/rb-site upgrade /opt/bitnami/apps/ reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard Best regards, Victoria. On Wednesday, April 25, 2012 12:50:37 PM UTC+3, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, Review Board 1.6.6 is out, and adds support for getting GitHub API tokens for private repos. See the news post and release notes at http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/04/25/review-board-166-released/ Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board 1.6.6 released
On Apr 30, 4:50 pm, Can Özmen canoz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Great work. I have a fresh 1.6.5 installed through BitNami on an EC2 instance. What's the upgrade procedure? Couldn't find it on the site or in the admin dashboard of the app. P.S. I have nothing in my install so I can wipe if necessary. For upgrading the BitNami installation you only need to take into account the path in which ReviewBoard is installed. According to the ReviewBoard official documentation the upgrade will involves two steps: 1.- Upgrade ReviewBoard with easy_install. Load the BitNami environment and execute: easy_install --prefix apps/reviewboard --script-dir apps/reviewboard/ bin --install-dir apps/reviewboard/lib -U ReviewBoard 2.- Upgrade your sites. The default site is created in /opt/bitnami/ apps/reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/bin/rb-site upgrade /opt/bitnami/apps/ reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard In any case if as you mention you don't have any data yet, it may be easier just launched a new instance. Best regards, Victoria. On Wednesday, April 25, 2012 12:50:37 PM UTC+3, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, Review Board 1.6.6 is out, and adds support for getting GitHub API tokens for private repos. See the news post and release notes at http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/04/25/review-board-166-released/ Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board 1.6.6 released
Thank you Victoria, easy_install could only find 1.6.5 from Bitnami's repo the last I checked. I'll wait a few days more I guess. Happy Workers Day, Can. On Tuesday, May 1, 2012 2:52:15 PM UTC+3, victoria wrote: On Apr 30, 4:50 pm, Can Özmen canoz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Great work. I have a fresh 1.6.5 installed through BitNami on an EC2 instance. What's the upgrade procedure? Couldn't find it on the site or in the admin dashboard of the app. P.S. I have nothing in my install so I can wipe if necessary. For upgrading the BitNami installation you only need to take into account the path in which ReviewBoard is installed. According to the ReviewBoard official documentation the upgrade will involves two steps: 1.- Upgrade ReviewBoard with easy_install. Load the BitNami environment and execute: easy_install --prefix apps/reviewboard --script-dir apps/reviewboard/ bin --install-dir apps/reviewboard/lib -U ReviewBoard 2.- Upgrade your sites. The default site is created in /opt/bitnami/ apps/reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/bin/rb-site upgrade /opt/bitnami/apps/ reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard In any case if as you mention you don't have any data yet, it may be easier just launched a new instance. Best regards, Victoria. On Wednesday, April 25, 2012 12:50:37 PM UTC+3, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, Review Board 1.6.6 is out, and adds support for getting GitHub API tokens for private repos. See the news post and release notes at http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/04/25/review-board-166-released/ Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Issue 2586 in reviewboard: Not able to login...
Updates: Status: SetupIssue Comment #1 on issue 2586 by trowb...@gmail.com: Not able to login... http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2586 You'll have to talk to your server administrator about this. This bug tracker is about the reviewboard software itself, not individual installations. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Issue 2587 in reviewboard: Would like ability to categorize comment/issues ( ala Codestriker ).
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 2587 by j...@jeffmarkham.com: Would like ability to categorize comment/issues ( ala Codestriker ). http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2587 *NOTE: If you have a patch, please submit it to http://reviews.reviewboard.org/ What version are you running? 1.6.6 What's the URL of the page this enhancement relates to, if any? Describe the enhancement and the motivation for it. We're using Carnegie Melon's TSP (Team Software Process). One of the major metrics of this process is categorizing defects (the kind, where they were injected and where they were removed). When making a review comment, if an issue is raised, we would like to be able to categorize the type of defect (syntax, algorithm, I/O, data, etc.) The categories should be customizable by an administrator. What operating system are you using? What browser? Linux, Firefox and Chrome. Please provide any additional information below. Ideally, when reviewboard 2.0 comes out, we would receive a notification on issue-injection and create a defect in our TSP software. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
