Re: post-review throw diff error

2012-05-16 Thread Nilesh Jaiswal
Yes this patch version 2.5.4 is running in my server.

I don't know how to patch that file locally with the same patch, Could you
help me with the step.

Kind Regards,
Nilesh

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote:

 Hi Nilesh,

 That version seems right, but I don't know why you're hitting that
 problem. Was that the version of patch running on the server?

 What happens if you try patching that file locally with the same patch?


 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


 On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi Chris,

 Could you please provide me a solution to resolve the issue.

 Regards,
 Nilesh


 On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.comwrote:

 is this patch version mentioned in the email you are talking about.? Or
 something else.

 What do i need to do?


 On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Nilesh Jaiswal 
 nileshj...@gmail.comwrote:

 If you are asking about the version path util then here it is.

 patch -version
 patch 2.5.4
 Copyright 1984-1988 Larry Wall
 Copyright 1989-1999 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

 Please correct me if i am wrong.


 On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Nilesh Jaiswal 
 nileshj...@gmail.comwrote:

 How to get the version of GNU patch. Are you asking about the version
 of post-review util.?


 On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Christian Hammond 
 chip...@chipx86.com wrote:

 Hi Nilesh,

 We run everything through GNU patch. That generally will handle the
 \ No newline at end of file.

 What version of GNU patch is running on that server? What happens if
 you try to apply that same patch on a developer machine?

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


 On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Nilesh Jaiswal 
 nileshj...@gmail.com wrote:

 Dear All,

 I have posted the queries on this but i haven't got any answer hence
 i am raising this queries again.

 After posting review request and then clicking on viewdiff link on
 RB server i get following error message for the files.

 The patch to
 '//sdm/DEV/V14_2_App/XSDGFDH/portals/sidadfds/resources/ApplicationManager.js'
 didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in
 '/tmp/reviewboard.pgHnuQ' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned:
 patching file /tmp/reviewboard.pgHnuQ/tmpVIuwIQ Hunk #2 FAILED at 931. 1
 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
 /tmp/reviewboard.pgHnuQ/tmpVIuwIQ-new.rej

 After looking into the /tmp/reviewboard.pgHnuQ/tmpVIuwIQ-new.rejor
 diff file in /tmp of RB server its says

 Pasting diff snippet which contains the following string (*\ No
 newline at end of file*) in
 ActionStatusEventHandlerThread.java.diff which has caused the diff 
 error.
 why can we not handle such cases in viewdiff.py script. Do we have any
 patch for the same. I would appreciate if you could provide me solution
 that will solve 100's of such failure issues.





 private void log(Exception e) {

 @@ -86,4 +93,4 @@ public class ActionStatusEventHandlerThr

 return ActionStatusEventHandlerThread;

 }



 -}

 +}

 *\ No newline at end of file*

 Regards,
 Nilesh J

  --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


  --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en





  --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


  --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate 

Diff fie size limited to 1 MB

2012-05-16 Thread Ashish Sharma
Hi,

With the release of Review Board (1.6.6), the diff file size is limited to
1MB only.

Since my setup has a limit of 15MB with earlier version and with the latest
update I am facing problems

How can it be increased to say atleast to 10MB.

thanks
Ashish

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Diff fie size limited to 1 MB

2012-05-16 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Ashish,

What's the size you're hitting with your diffs, and what's in them? Diffs
that are megabytes in size are generally impossible to review.

I'll look at making the limit flexible, but I want to better understand the
problems people are hitting.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Ashish Sharma ashiish.sha...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi,

 With the release of Review Board (1.6.6), the diff file size is limited to
 1MB only.

 Since my setup has a limit of 15MB with earlier version and with the
 latest update I am facing problems

 How can it be increased to say atleast to 10MB.

 thanks
 Ashish

 --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: post-review throw diff error

2012-05-16 Thread Christian Hammond
Get the file from the repository (we use p4 print //depot/path/to/file#rev
for this),  get the diff (just for that file), and then do:

patch -p0  diff-filename

You may need to tell it the location of the file, since it may not find it.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.comwrote:

 Yes this patch version 2.5.4 is running in my server.

 I don't know how to patch that file locally with the same patch, Could you
 help me with the step.

 Kind Regards,
 Nilesh


 On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Christian Hammond 
 chip...@chipx86.comwrote:

 Hi Nilesh,

 That version seems right, but I don't know why you're hitting that
 problem. Was that the version of patch running on the server?

 What happens if you try patching that file locally with the same patch?


 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


 On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi Chris,

 Could you please provide me a solution to resolve the issue.

 Regards,
 Nilesh


 On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.comwrote:

 is this patch version mentioned in the email you are talking about.? Or
 something else.

 What do i need to do?


 On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Nilesh Jaiswal 
 nileshj...@gmail.comwrote:

 If you are asking about the version path util then here it is.

 patch -version
 patch 2.5.4
 Copyright 1984-1988 Larry Wall
 Copyright 1989-1999 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

 Please correct me if i am wrong.


 On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.com
  wrote:

 How to get the version of GNU patch. Are you asking about the version
 of post-review util.?


 On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Christian Hammond 
 chip...@chipx86.com wrote:

 Hi Nilesh,

 We run everything through GNU patch. That generally will handle the
 \ No newline at end of file.

 What version of GNU patch is running on that server? What happens if
 you try to apply that same patch on a developer machine?

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


 On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Nilesh Jaiswal 
 nileshj...@gmail.com wrote:

 Dear All,

 I have posted the queries on this but i haven't got any answer
 hence i am raising this queries again.

 After posting review request and then clicking on viewdiff link on
 RB server i get following error message for the files.

 The patch to
 '//sdm/DEV/V14_2_App/XSDGFDH/portals/sidadfds/resources/ApplicationManager.js'
 didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in
 '/tmp/reviewboard.pgHnuQ' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned:
 patching file /tmp/reviewboard.pgHnuQ/tmpVIuwIQ Hunk #2 FAILED at 931. 
 1
 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
 /tmp/reviewboard.pgHnuQ/tmpVIuwIQ-new.rej

 After looking into the /tmp/reviewboard.pgHnuQ/tmpVIuwIQ-new.rejor
 diff file in /tmp of RB server its says

 Pasting diff snippet which contains the following string (*\ No
 newline at end of file*) in
 ActionStatusEventHandlerThread.java.diff which has caused the diff 
 error.
 why can we not handle such cases in viewdiff.py script. Do we have any
 patch for the same. I would appreciate if you could provide me solution
 that will solve 100's of such failure issues.





 private void log(Exception e) {

 @@ -86,4 +93,4 @@ public class ActionStatusEventHandlerThr

 return ActionStatusEventHandlerThread;

 }



 -}

 +}

 *\ No newline at end of file*

 Regards,
 Nilesh J

  --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


  --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en





  --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 

Re: Review Request not published

2012-05-16 Thread Geert Linders
Hi Christian,

I attached the headers and data for a publish and for a discard. I used 
the Live http headers and httpfox add-on for iceweasel to capture them.

Hope that helps.


Cheers - Geert

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=enhttp://nzchswreviews.au.ivc/api/review-requests/4310/reviews/draft/?api_format=json

GET /api/review-requests/4310/reviews/draft/?api_format=json HTTP/1.1
Host: nzchswreviews.au.ivc
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/2008 Iceweasel/3.5.16 (like Firefox/3.5.16)
Accept: application/json, text/javascript, */*
Accept-Language: en,en-us;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: true
Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7
Keep-Alive: 300
Connection: keep-alive
X-Requested-With: XMLHttpRequest
Referer: http://nzchswreviews.au.ivc/r/4310/
Cookie: rbsessionid=f63f634a35eb85f86e939f2d791ca43a; csrftoken=397c8540a69626cc3c3b077e4e921446; collapsediffs=True
If-Modified-Since: Wed, 16 May 2012 19:51:13 GMT

HTTP/1.1 301 MOVED PERMANENTLY
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 19:52:16 GMT
Server: Apache/2.2.20 (Ubuntu)
Content-Language: en-us
Expires: Wed, 16 May 2012 19:52:16 GMT
Vary: Accept,Cookie,Accept-Language
Cache-Control: max-age=0
Content-Length: 14
Last-Modified: Wed, 16 May 2012 19:52:16 GMT
Location: http://nzchswreviews.au.ivc/api/review-requests/4310/reviews/6631/?api_format=json
Keep-Alive: timeout=5, max=100
Connection: Keep-Alive
Content-Type: application/vnd.reviewboard.org.review-draft+json
--
http://nzchswreviews.au.ivc/api/review-requests/4310/reviews/6631/?api_format=json

GET /api/review-requests/4310/reviews/6631/?api_format=json HTTP/1.1
Host: nzchswreviews.au.ivc
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/2008 Iceweasel/3.5.16 (like Firefox/3.5.16)
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
Accept-Language: en,en-us;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: true
Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7
Keep-Alive: 300
Connection: keep-alive
Referer: http://nzchswreviews.au.ivc/r/4310/
Cookie: rbsessionid=f63f634a35eb85f86e939f2d791ca43a; csrftoken=397c8540a69626cc3c3b077e4e921446; collapsediffs=True
If-Modified-Since: Wed, 16 May 2012 02:21:52 GMT

HTTP/1.1 304 NOT MODIFIED
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 19:52:16 GMT
Server: Apache/2.2.20 (Ubuntu)
Connection: Keep-Alive
Keep-Alive: timeout=5, max=99
Expires: Wed, 16 May 2012 19:52:16 GMT
Cache-Control: max-age=0
Vary: Accept,Cookie,Accept-Language,Accept-Encoding
--
http://nzchswreviews.au.ivc/api/review-requests/4310/reviews/draft/?api_format=json

GET /api/review-requests/4310/reviews/draft/?api_format=json HTTP/1.1
Host: nzchswreviews.au.ivc
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/2008 Iceweasel/3.5.16 (like Firefox/3.5.16)
Accept: application/json, text/javascript, */*
Accept-Language: en,en-us;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: true
Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7
Keep-Alive: 300
Connection: keep-alive
X-Requested-With: XMLHttpRequest
Referer: http://nzchswreviews.au.ivc/r/4310/
Cookie: rbsessionid=f63f634a35eb85f86e939f2d791ca43a; csrftoken=397c8540a69626cc3c3b077e4e921446; collapsediffs=True
If-Modified-Since: Wed, 16 May 2012 19:52:16 GMT

HTTP/1.1 301 MOVED PERMANENTLY
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 19:52:46 GMT
Server: Apache/2.2.20 (Ubuntu)
Content-Language: en-us
Expires: Wed, 16 May 2012 19:52:46 GMT
Vary: Accept,Cookie,Accept-Language
Cache-Control: max-age=0
Content-Length: 14
Last-Modified: Wed, 16 May 2012 19:52:46 GMT
Location: http://nzchswreviews.au.ivc/api/review-requests/4310/reviews/6631/?api_format=json
Keep-Alive: timeout=5, max=100
Connection: Keep-Alive
Content-Type: application/vnd.reviewboard.org.review-draft+json
--
http://nzchswreviews.au.ivc/api/review-requests/4310/reviews/6631/?api_format=json

GET /api/review-requests/4310/reviews/6631/?api_format=json HTTP/1.1
Host: nzchswreviews.au.ivc
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/2008 Iceweasel/3.5.16 (like Firefox/3.5.16)
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
Accept-Language: en,en-us;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: true
Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7
Keep-Alive: 300
Connection: keep-alive
Referer: http://nzchswreviews.au.ivc/r/4310/
Cookie: rbsessionid=f63f634a35eb85f86e939f2d791ca43a; csrftoken=397c8540a69626cc3c3b077e4e921446; collapsediffs=True
If-Modified-Since: Wed, 16 May 2012 02:21:52 GMT

HTTP/1.1 304 NOT MODIFIED
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 19:52:46 GMT

Re: Review Request not published

2012-05-16 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Geert,

Hmmm so the publish.data and discard.data is what the addon is showing
what's coming back from the server? Because if so, there's something very
wrong here. That's XML data, and we're requesting JSON. I wonder if you
could install Firebug and reproduce just to make sure that's not some bug
with those addons not preserving the ?api_format=json.

If those are indeed what you're getting back, we'll need to figure out how
this is possibly happening.

Are you in any way behind a proxy? Is Review Board in the exception list? I
wouldn't expect a proxy to strip these arguments, but just something to
check.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Geert Linders glind...@dynamiccontrols.com
 wrote:

 Hi Christian,

 I attached the headers and data for a publish and for a discard. I
 used the Live http headers and httpfox add-on for iceweasel to capture
 them.

 Hope that helps.


 Cheers - Geert

 --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Request not published

2012-05-16 Thread Geert Linders
Hi Christian,

I upgraded my Iceweasel to install Firebug. Now after the upgrade the 
problem has gone away, so I can't produce the logs you want anymore. Sorry 
about that.

Is there anything else I can do for you to help?

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Request not published

2012-05-16 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Geert,

I wondered about that. I imagine there was some bug with Iceweasel causing
that. Based on the Firefox version it claimed to be based off of, it's
below our minimum supported browser requirements anyway. So if it works
now, awesome :)

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Geert Linders glind...@dynamiccontrols.com
 wrote:

 Hi Christian,

 I upgraded my Iceweasel to install Firebug. Now after the upgrade the
 problem has gone away, so I can't produce the logs you want anymore. Sorry
 about that.

 Is there anything else I can do for you to help?

 --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Problem creating a review after upgrading to 1.6.6 on CentOS 5.8 (patch file too large?)

2012-05-16 Thread Eric Johnson
I know I previously looked to see if I could get memcached to report what it 
has cached, but I didn't find anything.

Eric

On May 14, 2012, at 12:53 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:

 Hi,
 
 Sorry, been on vacation this week.
 
 I'm not sure if memcached provides an easy way to see what's in the cache. We 
 don't have one. Sounds like memcached was the bottleneck, though, with only 
 128MB of RAM allocated. I'd definitely recommend more.
 
 Have you made changes since our last exchange, and if so, is it any better?
 
 Christian
 
 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
 
 
 On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Alfred von Campe alf...@von-campe.com wrote:
 On May 7, 2012, at 16:56, Christian Hammond wrote:
 
 Memory and how much of it that memcached can use is crucial. We cache a 
 *lot*, since fetching files from the repository, patching them, and 
 generating diffs is all very expensive. So the more that memcached can hold 
 at once, the faster things will feel all around.
 
 After that, you'll get some gains from database optimization and from 
 increased CPU performance (for the diff generation).
 
 That's good to know.
 
 How big is your userbase, and what are your current specs? I know of servers 
 with thousands of users that stand up under constant use. Usually it's just 
 a configuration issue, or lack of memory for caching, that causes the most 
 problems.
 
 A few dozen users and about 15 repos.  It's on an older IBM xServer 335 with 
 a 3.06GHz Intel Xeon CPU and 2GB or memory with 128MB configured for 
 memcached.  I've only recently enabled memcached, so I'm not 100% certain it 
 is configured properly.  Is there a way to query it to see what it has cached?
 
 Alfred
 
 -- 
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
 
 -- 
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en