Re: Review Board 2.0.5 released for EPEL 7

Crud; ok, I see the problem. Unfortunately I'm sitting in an airport right now with insufficient Internet access to fix it. I'll try to get it fixed up on Friday. (Short version: I took a shortcut by copying from the Fedora 21 package and some of the deps are older in RHEL/CentOS 7. I need to

Re: Diff problems after 2.0.5 upgrade

Hi Christian, After a little investigation, the initial description of the problem was wrong. Sorry about that. What's actually happened is that diffs uploaded after the upgrade use different paths in our SVN repository: they have no leading slash. So a path that was /branches/... prior to the

Subversion not updating revisions

Hi, I have a new reviewboard installation (2.0.5), and we've setup a subversion repository. However, the repository is never synchronized with the server after it is first added. I can re-add the repo and am able to see the most recent revisions, but after that, the view into the repository

Re: Subversion not updating revisions

Daniel, This is a known issue and will be fixed in the next release. -David On Aug 13, 2014, at 7:19 AM, Daniel Dominguez daniel.j.doming...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have a new reviewboard installation (2.0.5), and we've setup a subversion repository. However, the repository is never

Can a regular Linux user install Reviewboard?

I do not have the root account and cannot sudo. I just want to install it under my home directory and run it with my own httpd. Is it possible? -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/

Re: Can a regular Linux user install Reviewboard?

Nope, you need ownership of the server. We offer Review Board hosting at https://rbcommons.com/ if you want to look into that instead. Christian --  Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On August 13,

Re: Issue 3486 in reviewboard: Upgrade 2.0 to 2.0.3 fails

Comment #9 on issue 3486 by robottom...@gmail.com: Upgrade 2.0 to 2.0.3 fails http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3486 We had the same issue going from 2.0 to 2.0.5 using postgres as the database. We followed this workaround and it worked. -- You received this message

Re: Issue 3441 in reviewboard: New request cannot be created in RB 2.0.2 opened with IE 10/11

Comment #7 on issue 3441 by rashmi6j...@gmail.com: New request cannot be created in RB 2.0.2 opened with IE 10/11 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3441 Also present in 2.0.5 -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue

Re: Issue 3503 in reviewboard: Formattings errors in description field

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 3503 by trowb...@gmail.com: Formattings errors in description field http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3503 Fixed in release-2.0.x (f43b839). This will ship in 2.0.6. Thanks! -- You received this message because this

Re: Issue 3524 in reviewboard: How to get the excel documents' diff

Updates: Status: WontFix Comment #2 on issue 3524 by trowb...@gmail.com: How to get the excel documents' diff http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3524 As answered on the earlier bug: There's no support for this, and that sort of work is very hard. Best you can do

Re: Issue 3526 in reviewboard: Ship it! many times by myself

Updates: Status: WontFix Comment #1 on issue 3526 by trowb...@gmail.com: Ship it! many times by myself http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3526 This is not possible. The design of the system is to purposely avoid a lot of process overhead, with the expectation