Re: Review Board 2.0.13 is out!
Hi David, Both ReviewBoard-2.0.13-1.el7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-0798/ReviewBoard-2.0.13-1.el7,python-djblets-0.8.15-1.el7?_csrf_token=ece4520dac50305f9779aaadf86012cee633767e and RBTools-0.7.1-1.el7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-0673/RBTools-0.7.1-1.el7?_csrf_token=ece4520dac50305f9779aaadf86012cee633767e are still in testing. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/ReviewBoard https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/RBTools You can upgrade to them by enabling the epel-testing repo like this: $ sudo yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing RBTools If you find the new versions work as expected, then please leave positive karma by commenting on the versions you've tested. I did this for the F21 package, which got it promoted from testing to stable: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1786/RBTools-0.7.1-1.fc21 Positive testing results from you will help other EPEL7 users benefit from these updates. Thanks, Paul On Thursday, February 19, 2015 at 9:02:58 PM UTC, David Carson wrote: Will this show up in CentOS 7 yum soon? Also, I was expecting the RBTools update to show up in CentOS 7 yum, but it has not. Thanks for the great work. There are several bug fixes that I'm anxious to pick up. On Tuesday, February 17, 2015 at 12:40:18 PM UTC-5, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Thu, 2015-02-12 at 14:22 -0800, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, We just put out a release of Review Board 2.0.13. This features several bug fixes, some new features for Subversion and administrators, and API performance improvements when using RBTools 0.7.1+. See the announcement for more info: https://www.reviewboard.org/news/2015/02/12/review-board-2-0-13-released/ And the release notes: https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/reviewboard/2.0.13/ Fedora 21 and EPEL 7 packages are available at: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/ReviewBoard -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Review Board 2.0.13 is out!
On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 04:44 -0800, Paul Fee wrote: Hi David, Both ReviewBoard-2.0.13-1.el7 and RBTools-0.7.1-1.el7 are still in testing. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/ReviewBoard https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/RBTools You can upgrade to them by enabling the epel-testing repo like this: $ sudo yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing RBTools If you find the new versions work as expected, then please leave positive karma by commenting on the versions you've tested. I did this for the F21 package, which got it promoted from testing to stable: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1786/RBTools-0.7.1-1.fc21 Positive testing results from you will help other EPEL7 users benefit from these updates. Correct. The EPEL repository is very heavily relied-upon by many people, so it has a very strict policy on what goes to stable there. All submitted packages go into epel-testing first and must remain there either for two weeks or until testers give it sufficient karma (positive votes to go to stable). When that happens, it will go to stable within 24 hours. The stable karma threshold for Review Board and RBTools is usually 1 positive vote for minor updates and 2 for major releases. Unfortunately, very few people other than Paul ever get around to granting karma, so it usually gets stuck there until the two-week limit is up. (Then I push it to stable, and occasionally we find bugs there, which is never pleasant). So please, install it from epel-testing and report back on it! -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Subversion access via https:// and plaintext passwords
Hi Alfred, That's correct. Our recommendations were to use SSH wherever possible (and originally, most of the target users were presumed to be in pretty locked-down environments), but it was a long-overdue change that needed to be made. From here on out, we're striving to ensure sensitive data is protected better. Christian -- Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com -Original Message- From: Alfred von Campe alf...@von-campe.com Reply: reviewboard@googlegroups.com reviewboard@googlegroups.com Date: February 20, 2015 at 12:14:29 PM To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com reviewboard@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Subversion access via https:// and plaintext passwords Christian: If you upgrade to the 2.0 releases, all passwords will be encrypted. I know it's not trivial, and maybe we can backport that to a 1.7 release, but as we're about to start on the 2.5 betas, we're unlikely to continue making major changes to 1.7 from here on out. We'll see what we can do though. Thanks for the lightning-quick response. So am I correct in assuming that prior to ReviewBoard 2.X everyone stored their passwords in plain text? That is, unless they accessed their repos with ssh keys and no password was required. Alfred -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Review Board version mismatch
I was able to get it to run by changing the directory name of ReviewBoard-2.0.13-py2.7.egg to ReviewBoard-2.0.12-py2.7.egg. On Friday, February 20, 2015 at 10:45:53 AM UTC-6, Daniel Bansch wrote: I'm trying to install review board on redhat with apache, mod_wsgi and mysql. I get this error when I go to my review board site: --- Manual server updates required A recent upgrade requires manual updates to be made on this server. After these changes are made, you should restart your web server. If you have any questions or problems, please contact us on our mailing list http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard. Review Board version mismatch The version of Review Board running does not match the version the site was last upgraded to. You are running *2.0.13* and the site was last upgraded to *2.0.12*. Please upgrade your site to fix this by running: $ rb-site upgrade /var/www/mysite --- I've run the rb-site upgrade /var/www/mysite and restarted everything, but the same error pops up. I have ReviewBoard-2.0.12-py2.7.egg and ReviewBoard-2.0.13-py2.7.egg in my python site-packages directory. Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks, Daniel -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Review Board version mismatch
On Friday, February 20, 2015, Daniel Bansch dban...@gmail.com wrote: I was able to get it to run by changing the directory name of ReviewBoard-2.0.13-py2.7.egg to ReviewBoard-2.0.12-py2.7.egg. On Friday, February 20, 2015 at 10:45:53 AM UTC-6, Daniel Bansch wrote: I'm trying to install review board on redhat with apache, mod_wsgi and mysql. I get this error when I go to my review board site: --- Manual server updates required A recent upgrade requires manual updates to be made on this server. After these changes are made, you should restart your web server. If you have any questions or problems, please contact us on our mailing list http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard. Review Board version mismatch The version of Review Board running does not match the version the site was last upgraded to. You are running *2.0.13* and the site was last upgraded to *2.0.12*. Please upgrade your site to fix this by running: $ rb-site upgrade /var/www/mysite --- I've run the rb-site upgrade /var/www/mysite and restarted everything, but the same error pops up. I have ReviewBoard-2.0.12-py2.7.egg and ReviewBoard-2.0.13-py2.7.egg in my python site-packages directory. Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks, Daniel -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com'); . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. Did you install it using the RPMs from the EPEL 7 repository or through easy_install? -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Issue 3781 in reviewboard: Problem generating diff files containing UNICODE characters (Fix in description)
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3781 by francois...@gmail.com: Problem generating diff files
containing UNICODE characters (Fix in description)
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3781
*** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING!
***
*** You must complete this form in its entirety, or your bug report will be
*** rejected.
***
*** If you have a security issue to report, please send it confidentially
to
*** secur...@reviewboard.org. Posting security-related issues to this bug
*** tracker causes us to have to do an emergency release.
***
*** For customer support, please post to reviewbo...@googlegroups.com
***
*** If you have a patch, please submit it to
http://reviews.reviewboard.org/
***
*** This bug tracker is public. Please check that any logs or other
information
*** that you include has been stripped of confidential information.
What version are you running?
RBTools 0.7.1 with Python 2.7
What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
None, problem lies in RBTools while generating a diff
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Have a file encoded in something else than ASCII
2. try to generate a diff using RBTools
3. It will fail with a message stating the 'ascii' converter cannot process
a character 128
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Expected output, a valid diff
What operating system are you using? What browser?
Windows 7, Chrome
Please provide any additional information below.
Here's the culprit:
Python27\Lib\site-packages\RBTools-0.7.1-py2.7.egg\rbtools\utils\process.py
Line 93
logging.debug('Command exited with rc %s: %s\n%s---'
% (rc, command, data))
It is logging what was read from the file data which can be encoded in
UNICODE. The logging fails and the whole diff file fails because of it.
Commenting out the logging statement successfully generates a diff. Logging
should probably be moved AFTER the conversion of the variable data in ASCII
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard-issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Review Board 2.0.13 is out!
Got it. Thanks. On Friday, February 20, 2015 at 8:48:40 AM UTC-5, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 04:44 -0800, Paul Fee wrote: Hi David, Both ReviewBoard-2.0.13-1.el7 and RBTools-0.7.1-1.el7 are still in testing. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/ReviewBoard https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/RBTools You can upgrade to them by enabling the epel-testing repo like this: $ sudo yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing RBTools If you find the new versions work as expected, then please leave positive karma by commenting on the versions you've tested. I did this for the F21 package, which got it promoted from testing to stable: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1786/RBTools-0.7.1-1.fc21 Positive testing results from you will help other EPEL7 users benefit from these updates. Correct. The EPEL repository is very heavily relied-upon by many people, so it has a very strict policy on what goes to stable there. All submitted packages go into epel-testing first and must remain there either for two weeks or until testers give it sufficient karma (positive votes to go to stable). When that happens, it will go to stable within 24 hours. The stable karma threshold for Review Board and RBTools is usually 1 positive vote for minor updates and 2 for major releases. Unfortunately, very few people other than Paul ever get around to granting karma, so it usually gets stuck there until the two-week limit is up. (Then I push it to stable, and occasionally we find bugs there, which is never pleasant). So please, install it from epel-testing and report back on it! -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Mass changing user preferences/setting preference defaults for new users
Hi, Is there a way to change the preferences en-masse for a bunch of users? I want to turn off the “Get e-mail notifications for my own activity” across the board. Additionally, I would like to change this as the default for new users going forward. Thanks, Vitali -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Review Board version mismatch
I'm trying to install review board on redhat with apache, mod_wsgi and mysql. I get this error when I go to my review board site: --- Manual server updates required A recent upgrade requires manual updates to be made on this server. After these changes are made, you should restart your web server. If you have any questions or problems, please contact us on our mailing list http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard. Review Board version mismatch The version of Review Board running does not match the version the site was last upgraded to. You are running *2.0.13* and the site was last upgraded to *2.0.12*. Please upgrade your site to fix this by running: $ rb-site upgrade /var/www/mysite --- I've run the rb-site upgrade /var/www/mysite and restarted everything, but the same error pops up. I have ReviewBoard-2.0.12-py2.7.egg and ReviewBoard-2.0.13-py2.7.egg in my python site-packages directory. Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks, Daniel -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Subversion access via https:// and plaintext passwords
We have been using ReviewBoard with our Subversion repos using svn+ssh:// access, and while functional, it’s been a little slow. Performance with https:// access to our Subversion servers is noticeably faster, but when I configure the Repository in ReviewBoard and specify the username and password to use, I noticed that the password is stored in plain text in the database. The database itself is not easily accessible by users, but the nightly database dumps could be read by others, so I am concerned about a possible exposure of automated build user account password. We are still using ReviewBoard 1.7.27 as it is hosted on a CentOS 6 server, so upgrading to 2.X is not trivial. Is it common practice for ReviewBoard users to store repository passwords in the database in plain text? Alfred -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Subversion access via https:// and plaintext passwords
Hi Alfred, If you upgrade to the 2.0 releases, all passwords will be encrypted. I know it's not trivial, and maybe we can backport that to a 1.7 release, but as we're about to start on the 2.5 betas, we're unlikely to continue making major changes to 1.7 from here on out. We'll see what we can do though. Christian -- Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com -Original Message- From: Alfred von Campe alf...@von-campe.com Reply: reviewboard@googlegroups.com reviewboard@googlegroups.com Date: February 20, 2015 at 12:07:29 PM To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com reviewboard@googlegroups.com Subject: Subversion access via https:// and plaintext passwords We have been using ReviewBoard with our Subversion repos using svn+ssh:// access, and while functional, it’s been a little slow. Performance with https:// access to our Subversion servers is noticeably faster, but when I configure the Repository in ReviewBoard and specify the username and password to use, I noticed that the password is stored in plain text in the database. The database itself is not easily accessible by users, but the nightly database dumps could be read by others, so I am concerned about a possible exposure of automated build user account password. We are still using ReviewBoard 1.7.27 as it is hosted on a CentOS 6 server, so upgrading to 2.X is not trivial. Is it common practice for ReviewBoard users to store repository passwords in the database in plain text? Alfred -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Subversion access via https:// and plaintext passwords
Christian: If you upgrade to the 2.0 releases, all passwords will be encrypted. I know it's not trivial, and maybe we can backport that to a 1.7 release, but as we're about to start on the 2.5 betas, we're unlikely to continue making major changes to 1.7 from here on out. We'll see what we can do though. Thanks for the lightning-quick response. So am I correct in assuming that prior to ReviewBoard 2.X everyone stored their passwords in plain text? That is, unless they accessed their repos with ssh keys and no password was required. Alfred -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: RBTools 0.7 is released!
The 'rbt' help for the *post* command does not explain what kind of pattern (regex, glob, ??) should be used for the new -X option. Can you clarify? And can this be added to the help screen as well? Thanks. On Saturday, February 7, 2015 at 11:16:15 AM UTC-5, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 08:37 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Sun, 2015-01-18 at 00:39 -0800, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, We just put out a release of RBTools 0.7, the latest major evolution of RBTools. In it you'll find native installers for Windows and Mac, support for custom RBTools command aliases, a new command to land reviewed changes, options for excluding files from review, support for Microsoft Team Foundation Server, performance enhancements, and more. See the official announcement for more of the juicy details: https://www.reviewboard.org/news/2015/01/18/rbtools-0-7-is-here/ Fedora and EPEL packages are now on their way. You can wait for them to show up in the updates-testing repositories within 48 hours, or you can download the RPMs immediately from https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/RBTools I forgot to send email yesterday, but RBTools 0.7.1 should be available in Fedora 20+ and EPEL 6 and 7 now. You can update with yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing RBTools (Substituting updates-testing with epel-testing as appropriate). -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
