Hi,
rbt should be figuring out that it's a git-svn clone and doing the right
thing. Can you run with --debug and send us the output?
-David
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 7:45 PM wrote:
> In my setup, I have a local git which is accessing the remote svn through
> git svn.
> if I
In my setup, I have a local git which is accessing the remote svn through
git svn.
if I use rbt diff, the diff is git format, does not have //trunk/
prefix, which results that the remote server cannot apply the patch by rbt
patch.
I suspect I am using it wrong, but anyone can shield some
There's also been some experimental work done (not by us) on updating
CodeMirror (the editing component we use) to make use of the Content
Editable support in browsers (which essentially puts part of the DOM into
an edit mode). That mode supports syntax highlighting and formatting,
giving the best
Oh, OK, I see what you mean now. Can you either create a patch to handle
the new error message coming from git or file a bug about this?
-David
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 2:32 AM fluzz wrote:
>
>
> Le dimanche 7 août 2016 20:02:06 UTC+2, David Trowbridge a écrit :
>>
>>
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4448/
--
New ticket #4448 by david
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board
Status: New
Hi Terry,
Unfortunately, browsers don't expose an API to enable spellcheck on elements
(yet). We are waiting on this feature from the major browser vendors. We would
have to bundle a third party spellcheck library at the moment, which would add
quite a bit of bloat.
Regards,
Barret Rennie
>
Are there any plans to add spellcheck when creating comments in Markdown? I
found some old threads and release notes from a couple of years ago... any
updates?
Thanks,
Terry
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board
Le dimanche 7 août 2016 20:02:06 UTC+2, David Trowbridge a écrit :
>
> It actually looks like the locally synchronized copy on the review board
> server has some corruption (the "bad file"). I'd suggest doing a new full
> clone.
>
> -David
>
>
I tried this simple test on a fresh new empty