--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4847/
--
New ticket #4847 by brokenalarms
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board
Status:
We attempt to post the first image file attachment we find that's
compatible with Slack (standard PNG/JPEG/etc.), so it should show up.
However, this does depend on the ability for Slack to reach your server, so
for internal servers it's likely never going to show the screenshot. Same
with pasting
That's where the search index comes in. You can already use the search API
to find review requests based on those fields, but the API doesn't have
pagination support, and needs a redesign to be useful in that way.
Christian
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 2:41 AM Paul Mansfield <
That's definitely going to be the big topic.
Christian
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 5:26 AM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 4:04 AM Christian Hammond
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > It's been a productive (and very busy) few months for us here at
> Beanbag/Review Board.
Here is the content of /etc/httpd/logs/error_log
[Wed Oct 23 11:00:54.847259 2019] [core:notice] [pid 14980] SELinux policy
enabled; httpd running as context system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0
[Wed Oct 23 11:00:54.849360 2019] [suexec:notice] [pid 14980] AH01232:
suEXEC mechanism enabled (wrapper:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 4:04 AM Christian Hammond
wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> It's been a productive (and very busy) few months for us here at
> Beanbag/Review Board. We've had our heads down working toward the
> long-overdue (but justifiably delayed, for reasons I'll get into in another
>
Hi Christian -- thanks for the detailed reply. So to explain the request in
more detail:
We have no concern about the Summary field, nor the repo name or branch.
It's really only the Description field we care about because it contains
potentially unbounded amounts of text, and maybe sensitive
Hi Christian -- thanks for the detailed reply. So to explain the request in
more detail:
We have no concern about the Summary field, nor the repo name or branch.
It's really only the Description field we care about because it contains
potentially unbounded amounts of text, and maybe sensitive
for searching the description and testing fields, a simple free text
database like namazu would probably be a better way than using SQL to scan
text fields.
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out
Ideally any field in a review request should be useable as a filter, but I
accept that the demands of indexing would be a problem.
On Wednesday, 23 October 2019 08:11:25 UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> So there's a challenge with this that I hadn't considered before.
>
> We don't
Hi everyone,
It's been a productive (and *very* busy) few months for us here at
Beanbag/Review Board. We've had our heads down working toward the
long-overdue (but justifiably delayed, for reasons I'll get into in another
post) Review Board 4.0 beta 1, growing the company to further fund
So there's a challenge with this that I hadn't considered before.
We don't automatically create an index for the branch field. While we could
push an update that adds one, this can impact upgrades to 3.0.16,
potentially taking a substantially long time to complete. We try to avoid
this for point
Hi,
It sounds like while a newer Review Board package was installed, the
version that Bitnami itself is using was not updated.
Can you show me what's in the
/opt/reviewboardpowerpack-2.5.10-1/python/lib/python2.7/site-packages/
directory?
Bitnami environments are a bit specialized, so you may
Hi Paul,
Hmm, I thought we had this as part of the API. I'll add that for 3.0.16.
We're aiming for an early-November release, trying to wrap up some work
before we get that release ready, but it'll probably be the 5th or the 12th.
If need-be, extensions can always provide custom API to fill in
Hi Mark,
Can you provide the full trace for that platform_system error? I'm not
seeing a reference to that in any of our codebases.
Christian
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 8:46 AM Mark Fullerton
wrote:
> Hi Christian
> Not upgrading pip gets around the asana issue this is pip version
> 8.1.2
15 matches
Mail list logo
