Hi,
It's not too hard to create a review request and then add a diff (POST to
the review-requests resource, then POST to the linked diffs resource), but
other than the RBTools code we don't have any examples. Filling the branch
field is just a question of supplying that field in your POST/PUT requ
Eric's answers are correct.
Note that you don't necessarily need to install the exact version that was
installed previously. You can install the latest, connect it to your
database, and then run the upgrade procedures.
David
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 11:46 AM 'Eric Johnson' via Review Board Commun
Hi,
A couple questions:
1. It looks like you’re using some custom tool to post this. Can you detail
what your workflow looks like?
2. Can you get (or ask your server administrator to get) the error from the
server log?
David
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 12:26 AM Vinayak Awasare <
vinayak.awasare...
Hi,
Can you share an example of the commit message on a commit where it fails
like this? Newlines and all?
David
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:27 PM Liran wrote:
> Hi,
> anyone maybe have an answer for my question...?
> Thanks,
> Liran.
>
> בתאריך יום חמישי, 20 בפברואר 2020 בשעה 09:06:59 UTC+2, מ
It would be helpful if you included any error messages, but I suspect it's
just a Python syntax problem--argument names can't contain a ":" character.
We should be able to get around this using a kwargs dict:
kwargs = {
'extra_data:json-patch': {
'op': 'replace',
'path': 'bean
ya/p4/rbtools/../rbtools/api/request.py", line 661, in
> process_error
> rsp['err']['msg'])
> rbtools.api.errors.BadRequestError: extra_data: Could not parse JSON
> data: Expecting property name enclosed in double quotes: line 1 column 2
> (char 1)
>
> My code loo
We're planning on getting a first beta of 4.0 out within the next few
weeks. The time from then to final release is probably a few months, but
will depend on how stable it is.
I would like to clarify the versions, though. Review Board 3.0.x ships
jQuery 1.11.1 and jQuery UI 1.8.24. jQuery 1.11.1 h
It looks like you typoed your directory name: “samlpe_extension”
David
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 8:11 AM Petr Grenar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am quite new to the reviewboard. I installed it on my centos 7. Board is
> up and running. Now I am trying to install a simple extension from your
> tutorial
The mute functionality works only if e-mails are sent directly. Are you
receiving the e-mails via a mailing list?
David
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 10:11 AM Noel Grandin wrote:
>
> OK, so I found the mute functionality.
>
> But it doesn't work. Every time someone pushes an update to a change it
> se
We do have some long-term plans to make it possible for multiple authors to
collaborate on a single change in that way, but it's not a super
high priority right now. We already have this tracked at
https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/2187/
David
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 9:26 PM Teddy Saintvil
Sebastian,
It looks like we unfortunately don't have an easy way to download the first
revision if it was initially posted as part of the first publish of the
review request (if it was added later, it could be downloaded from the
"review request changed" boxes). We'll see if we can do something ab
Without connecting a repository, you won't be able to get the two-column
view with the full old and new files. However, It is possible to create a
new review request without a repository (go to "New Review Request", then
select "None - file attachments only") and then upload your diff as a file
att
There are slightly different issues here.
For Petr's code: you're instantiating a new SampleApprovalHook every time a
signal is fired. You'll want to just do it once in your extension's
initialize() method.
For Travis, it sounds like you're running your extension code in a
production setting wi
nitialize method assuming the results would be around for a
> while, but if this may be enabled/disabled multiple times per page render,
> it sounds like I am better off only executing these calls in the actual
> actions I am hooking into?
>
> Thanks,
> Travis
>
> On Tuesday,
Hi,
If you're referring to the Microsoft help file format, it's a binary file
which we do not have support for unpacking right now.
David
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 9:51 AM varun gupta
wrote:
> Is ".chm" file review option is available on reviewboard? please suggest.
>
> --
> Supercharge your Rev
The lines which are cut off show some kind of python package conflict.
You’ll need to look in your Apache error log for those.
David
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 8:35 AM Paul Mansfield <
paul.mansfi...@agileanalog.com> wrote:
> selinux?
>
> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
> https
Can you run "tf vc help" and send us the output?
Thanks,
David
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 8:58 AM todor.radosl...@gmail.com <
todor.radoslavov.rusi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> when i try for example rbt post, status and so on i face every time same
> error:
>
> ERROR: Could not load SCM Client "tfs"
> T
Hi,
The reports functionality is available with the Power Pack extension:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
David
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 6:23 PM Sivakumar Thiyagarajan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The report is not visible my login, does need any specific permission to
> see?
>
> Thanks & Regards
>
Hi,
It definitely could be timing out because of the size of the diff. How big
is "big"?
I highly recommend upgrading to the latest RBTools as well. It's quite a
bit smarter about how it deals with git.
David
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 10:48 AM ladner...@gmail.com <
ladner.dan...@gmail.com> wrote:
_hgextimport\n', u'return importfunc(name, globals, *args,
> **kwargs)\n', u' File
> "/usr/local/Cellar/mercurial/4.9.1/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mercurial/util.py",
> line 180, in \n', u"'md5': hashlib.md5,\n", u' File
In order to do what? You'll probably be using a local checkout on your
client machine to do your development (and can post changes from that to
the Review Board server with RBTools). In almost all cases the server does
not need a local clone of the repository.
David
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:56
to view the review requests which were already created earlier.
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:28 PM David Trowbridge
> wrote:
>
>> In order to do what? You'll probably be using a local checkout on your
>> client machine to do your development (and can post changes from
Sebastien,
At the moment I’m not aware of anything. We have been intending to make the
trophy system something that can be built on using the extensions system.
If you have ideas for this we’d love to hear them.
David
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 7:22 AM Sébastien Sénégas
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I wa
Christopher,
Off the top of my head I can't think of any reason why extension bundles
would fail on Windows, but there are a variety of issues that can occur on
Windows due to its sketchy Python support, which is why we defer to bitnami
for all of that.
Would it be possible to share what code you
Phil,
It's fine to load the database dump when running the latest release, but
before actually using the app, you'll need to run the upgrade procedure:
https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/3.0/admin/upgrading/upgrading-sites/#upgrading-sites
David
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 8:08 AM Phil Brindle
Oct 27, 2020 at 3:37 AM Phil Brindley wrote:
> thanks! do i need to clean the existing the reviewboard db before running
> the loaddb or set anything so that i can create/overwrite things as needed?
>
> On Monday, October 26, 2020 at 5:51:20 PM UTC David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>> P
A few questions:
1. What version of Review Board are you using?
2. How did you create your diff file?
3. How are you creating the review request? Are you using the web UI ("New
Review Request") or RBTools?
David
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 12:47 PM Alexandre Nader
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a reposito
Matt,
You can either file the bug at https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/new/
and mark it as "Security Issue", or email us at secur...@beanbaginc.com
David
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 12:28 PM MattS wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently discovered a security vulnerability which I'd like to not
> disc
Given that there are probably only a couple files that are relevant, you
could just attach them non-zipped. Other ways of sharing them could be
github or a pastebin.
David
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 7:23 AM Christopher Nostrand
wrote:
> Hello David,
>
> Sorry for not responding earlier. The conver
That's currently not a feature of Review Board. It may be at some point in
the future, but for now, given the wide variety of both supported SCM
systems as well as different workflows, we've chosen to leave version
control to the version control tools.
David
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 4:12 AM Ayush
The Review Board 4.0 and RBTools 2.0 releases, which are coming quite soon,
will support both Python 2.7 and 3.6-3.9
David
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 12:21 PM Jimmy Huang wrote:
> AFAIK Reviewboard/RBTools is still being developed and maintain on Python
> 2.x which is now EOL. Are there any plans
t;
>> I am using review board V3.0.8
>> I create my file by selecting the folder(s) or file(s) modified and then
>> creating a patch that I upload to create the review
>> I am using the web UI
>>
>> Thanks and good week end
>>
>> Le lun. 2 nov. 2020 à 20
This sounds like you have not actually installed the Review Board package
on your system. Can you explain what steps you've already taken?
David
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 11:12 PM Nikhil Sethi wrote:
>
> I am trying to install reviewboard on the local machine
>
> rb-site install /var/www/reviews
pip
>
> Now rb-site install returns error command not found.
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 11:42 AM David Trowbridge
> wrote:
>
>> This sounds like you have not actually installed the Review Board package
>> on your system. Can you explain what st
ar. 17 nov. 2020 à 21:15, David Trowbridge a
> écrit :
>
>> First of all, it's possible that this is a bug which has been fixed since
>> 3.0.8 (I don't know off the top of my head, but I know that we've found and
>> fixed several unicode-related issues over th
/apache-wsgi.conf
> reviews.example.com.conf
> $ cd ../sites-enabled
> $ ln -s ../sites-available/reviews.example.com.conf
>
> My apache server does not start after this!
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 4:17 AM David Trowbridge
> wrote:
&g
Is it possible that people are editing the repository entries in the admin
UI? Saved passwords in forms will often get overwritten or erased by
overeager browser autofill.
David
On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 6:31 AM vale...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we are using Gitlib server which is connected t
It looks like your web server is unable to find the "p4" executable. We've
mostly moved away from requiring that but it seems like accepting
certificates still uses it.
David
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 9:16 AM Glen Banyard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So I have set up Perforce on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS and installed
Hi,
I'm guessing you're referring to the commits that show up when you go to
the "New Review Request" page. What you should do is configure Review Board
with the remote address of your SVN server, rather than with the local SVN
checkout.
David
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:39 AM Rameez Bhimani
wro
Teddy,
If you're viewing a diff that you had previously viewed before the upgrade,
it's likely that old data may still be in cache. I'd suggest restarting
your memcached service, clearing your browser cache, and then trying again.
David
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 7:48 AM teds...@gmail.com
wrote:
Jake,
We don’t use pull requests (unfortunately GitHub doesn’t let us turn them
off). All contributions need to go to https://reviews.reviewboard.org/
Thanks,
David
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 7:56 AM Jake Stine wrote:
> Basic jist seems to be that it's an isolated problem specifically to
> git+
Hi,
Rather than trying to build this yourself using webhooks, I'd suggest
trying out the rb-integrations 2.0 beta1 release, which includes a jenkins
integration:
https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/rbintegrations/2.0-beta-1/
https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/4.0/admin/integrations
It sounds like static media is not being properly served by your web server.
As Christian mentioned, 2.5.x is end-of-life, and the RPM is no longer
maintained. We won’t be able to provide any further help if you’re going to
be using this version/install method.
David
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 7:0
Can you look in the Review Board and/or web server log files?
David
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 6:31 PM Mike Basov wrote:
> Hello guys!
>
> I have just installed ReviewBoard 4.0.1 on my Ubuntu 20.04 VM and always
> see Error 500 when I am trying to open review board in the configured
> localhost.
>
It looks like the built-in tools did not get properly registered. The usual
culprit is some kind of dependency conflict. The first thing to do is check
your log files for any errors, especially anything that looks like
"VersionConflict"
Once anything you've found is fixed, you can re-register the
Hi,
You'll need to check the log files to see what's happening. Just getting a
503 doesn't really tell us much.
David
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 12:18 AM Marcel Samek wrote:
> I have been trying to add a repository today, but when I submit the form,
> it hangs for a really long time and then event
s
> so I don't believe I have any log files.
>
> It's not clear to me if it does not like some of the parameters I am using
> for the repo definition, or whether something is down at RBCommons.
>
> On Monday, June 7, 2021 at 11:28:36 PM UTC-7 David Trowbridge wrote:
>
For both errors, would you be able to run with --debug and send us the
output?
What version of RBTools and Review Board?
David
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 10:22 AM Gyanendra Prakash <
gyanendraprakash...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am facing this problem: "The repository path specified is not in the
> li
Hi,
Would you mind running your rbt command with --debug and including the
output?
Can you share how the repository is configured in the Review Board admin
site?
David
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 8:01 AM Peter Šilon wrote:
> My .reviewboardrc. RB version 4.0.3
>
> REVIEWBOARD_URL = "http://wskkosd0
hon3.7/dist-packages/rbtools/api/transport/sync.py",
> line 91, in _execute_request
> rsp = self.server.make_request(request)
> File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/rbtools/api/request.py",
> line 815, in make_request
> self.process_error(e.code, e.read()
Hi,
Can you run with —debug and send us the output?
David
On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 8:52 PM gaurav chauhan
wrote:
> Hi,
> when i am running "rbt post", bellow error is coming. I am using rbt tools
> in centos 7
> Error -> " Unknown error, 'platform_system' is not defined "
>
> --
> Supercharge y
Stuart,
While it's theoretically possible to develop against an installed package,
you'll generally have much better success if you set up a dev environment.
See
https://www.notion.so/reviewboard/Getting-Started-da208d46de1d47d8b38e8b5ddcb3dd44
for details.
David
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 9:56 AM S
The correct module is "mysqlclient". I'd suggest doing "pip install -U
ReviewBoard[mysql]" to ensure you get everything correct. See the
installation instructions at
https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/4.0/admin/installation/linux/#id2
David
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 9:15 AM hao zheng wrote:
Hi,
You need to create an extension, which is a full python package that can be
installed alongside Review Board. Details on how to do this are in the
manual:
https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/4.0/extending/
David
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 9:21 PM 'liudaolunhuibl' via Review Board Community
Hi,
I'm not very familiar with Allura but it looks like it's a different
category than Review Board. Review Board focuses on code review, whereas
Allura is repository hosting, wikis, and bug tracking.
David
On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 12:48 AM mavavilj
wrote:
> Anyone else who looked at Apache All
Hi,
It sounds like you’re using a version of Review Board from before we added
multi-commit support, and abusing the interdiff feature (which is intended
to show changes between revisions of a code change) to instead show the
changes between your commits.
What version of Review Board and RBTools
rver's version in this case because it
> is hosted by https://rbcommons.com/
>
> thanks,
> Pratyush
>
> On Thursday, December 16, 2021 at 1:12:58 PM UTC+5:30 David Trowbridge
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It sounds like you’re using a version of Review Boa
Josh,
The RPM hasn't been maintained in a very long time. Installing via the
python toolchain is the best way to get running and stay up to date.
David
On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 11:25 AM Josh Davis wrote:
> We have upgraded all of our servers to RHEL8 and I am trying to get
> ReviewBoard installe
There's definitely some kind of change that happened. You may find a better
traceback in the log file. Probably some dependency got upgraded somehow,
or a previously installed but non-active extension got enabled.
That said, "1.4" is not a version of Review Board. If you mean 1.5.x, those
versions
Can you run with --debug and send the output?
David
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 7:34 PM Dan Beygelman wrote:
> Hi,
> i get this error when i run rbt post command
> #> /usr/bin/rbt post
> Unexpected error loading command post: name 'platform_system' is not
> defined
>
> #> /usr/bin/rbt --versio
>
You can update this by going to the admin site and clicking "General" under
"Settings". Change the "Server" field (and perhaps the media/static URLs if
necessary) to be https instead of http.
David
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 10:31 AM Manoj Sharma
wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> We've recently migrated ou
For Git, in addition to the clone URL, you'll need to have some kind of
front-end that supports full-file fetching such as cgit, gitweb, or
rb-gateway. The git protocol alone isn't sufficient for Review Board's
needs.
See
https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/4.0/admin/configuration/repositories
Adam,
This is a long-standing limitation of the current API. We're planning on
adding a new resource soon to query reviews across all review requests.
There is an extension that we've used internally that adds a new API
endpoint to do this. It's not well documented but perhaps it could serve as
a
Reena,
The .reviewboardrc file configures rbtools, but you'll also need to make
sure that the repository is configured on the server within the Review
Board admin UI. Has it been added there?
David
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 7:17 PM Reena THOMAS
wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
>
>
> I’m unable to find the re
The issue is that a newer release of django-braces dropped support for
Python 2, and 3.0.11 was not specific about pinning the version needed. You
can manually install django-braces==1.13.0, but I wouldn't be surprised if
that just moves the error down to another package. 3.0.11 is quite old and
wi
Yes, you can move directly to a new version. What you'll need to do is copy
over the old site directory and move the database. Once everything is set
up, start by running `rb-site /path/to/site upgrade` to handle the schema
changes.
David
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 7:08 PM 胡一辉 wrote:
> The reviewb
How are you running the tests? Have you set up a development environment?
David
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 1:22 PM Shubha Ramani
wrote:
> Using Python 3.7 and installed all the dependencies including django 1.11
> I am trying to run test_ldap_auth_backend.py and keep getting the error:
> django.co
Hi,
This is not possible from the UI. You'll need to use RBTools to do this.
David
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 10:08 AM yoimnewhere hello
wrote:
> Hey, I want to create review requests that have multiple commits for each
> review request.
> Is that possible over the UI?
> Right now, I can only cre
Hi,
I'm not sure why the ubuntu package isn't working--that looks correct
(perhaps there's a python version conflict somewhere). Confusingly, the
"pysvn" package on PyPI is not the same thing as the older pysvn, and is a
new package that someone created and managed to claim the name since the
orig
ember 16, 2022 at 1:52:45 PM UTC-8 David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>> How are you running the tests? Have you set up a development environment?
>>
>> David
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 1:22 PM Shubha Ramani
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Using Py
Rama,
If you want to save the patch to a file, you can do that with rbt patch:
rbt patch --write 1234.diff 1234
By default, that will grab the latest diff. If you want a specific revision
you can use --diff-revision
David
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 10:54 AM 'Ramakrishnan P R' via Review Board
Com
es were excluded from the patch.
>
> Successfully applied patch.
>
>
>
> I found another way to do it using --print:
>
> rbt patch --print 260437 > 260437.diff
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rama
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* reviewboard@google
Mark,
`rbt land` does assume that your working branch has a different name than
your tracking branch--that is, that you'd have origin/X, X, and then some
local-only named branch. `rbt land` would then handle stamping and merging
from local-only to X (and optionally pushing). We've found that's usu
Hi,
It looks like it’s failing to connect to your configured memcached server.
David
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 6:51 AM Владислав Болашев
wrote:
> Hello. I try to run a RB, but have a problem
>
> [2023-03-13 12:08:25 +0300] [65554] [INFO] Starting gunicorn 20.1.0
> [2023-03-13 12:08:25 +0300] [6
Kerry,
Glad you got it working. We’re seriously considering dropping support for
subvertpy, as it has grown increasingly buggy over the last few years. This
sounds like another data point in favor of that.
David
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 10:35 AM Kerry Groeschel
wrote:
> You can disregard my la
was made over ipv6 (normal behavior?) and failed.
> Adding '-l ::1' fixed it.
>
David
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 9:27 AM Chanson Joy wrote:
> and why is that ? i have a fresh install, having the same issue.
>
> On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 9:40:14 AM UTC-7 David Trowbridge
pv6 (normal behavior?) and failed.
> Adding '-l ::1' fixed it.
>
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 9:27 AM Chanson Joy wrote:
> Identical issue, I have windows 10 with WSL2 Ubuntu, please help.
>
> On Monday, October 17, 2022 at 9:01:04 AM UTC-7 David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>>
Hi,
The problem is not on the client, but on the Review Board server's
connection to your SVN server:
>
> Error data: {'err': {'code': 207, 'msg': 'The file was not found in the
> repository.'}, 'file': '/X3240/trunk/API/mtd/mtdHunit.c', 'revision':
> '12399', 'stat': 'fail'}
>
You'll need to lo
The mailing list field expects a single address to use for a distribution
list. If you leave it blank, emails will be sent addressed to all members
of the group individually.
David
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 5:21 AM Chanson Joy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to create a review group, the optional mailin
It sounds like perhaps you imported the data from a 3.0.18 database into
the database schema of 4.0.2
You'll want to drop the database entirely, import the dump, then run the
rb-site upgrade command.
On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 1:11 PM Adam Weremczuk wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a production server ha
Adam,
SECRET_KEY is necessary, and needs to be the same between the two servers.
The missing Site sounds like something didn't work right migrating the
database.
David
On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 4:55 AM Adam Weremczuk wrote:
> ...or perhaps the SECRET_KEY feature can be disabled?
>
> On Tue, 4 Apr
Becky,
Thanks for the report. We'll get this fixed up for the next 5.0.x release.
David
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 11:17 AM 'Becky Wong' via Review Board Community <
reviewboard@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was interested in using the automatic login feature and poked through
> the cod
Kerry,
The first thing to do is verify the network configuration on the Review
Board server. It’s the server which is experiencing these timeouts.
If you don’t need DMARC for your emails, you could also change the settings
for email delivery to avoid the DNS lookup here. That said, if DNS is
unre
Erin,
Review Board is built on Python, not PHP. If you're seeing something else,
it's likely that the web server still has some default configuration for
the domain/virtualhost active.
David
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 6:33 PM Erin Keegan wrote:
> I went through the install directions, but when I
> have to check again.
>
> Thanks again for your response.
> Erin
>
> Sent from my Atari 2600
>
> On Jun 27, 2023, at 18:31, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>
> Erin,
>
> Review Board is built on Python, not PHP. If you're seeing something else,
> it'
Hi,
That should be the correct setting to change. You probably need to restart
the web server in order for that change to take effect.
David
On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 7:49 AM Gianluca Busiello <
gianluca.busie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm running RB v4.x and I'm affected by the error:
>
> API Error
Hi,
Is there a reason why you're looking to install from the git repository
instead of the published releases? The install documentation you linked to
should be the correct process for most people.
David
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 12:30 PM Work Bot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to find instruction
Ethan,
That's definitely a bug. We'll be turning out a 6.0.1 soon and will get a
fix in for that.
If your company has a support contract with us, please reach out through
that channel and we can get you a preview build.
David
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 1:00 PM Ethan Nguyen wrote:
> I did some di
Changxing,
A couple questions about this:
- What browser(s) are you using?
- Are you getting this every time, or is this an intermittent failure?
- Can you open your browser's developer tools and see if there are any
errors on the JavaScript console?
Thanks,
David
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 10:07 A
l a specific version of RB (for example 5.0.5)
> instead of the latest one. I think I figured out a workaround through
> python setup.py file,
>
> On Thursday, October 12, 2023 at 2:34:15 PM UTC-4 David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there a reason why you're l
Hi,
It's saying "connection refused", which indicates there's some problem with
the network between you and your Review Board server.
David
On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 9:27 PM min cai wrote:
> when i use reviewboard I got two errors，
> the First one,when i edit the draft review,but i cant save the
e?
>
> Thanks so much!
>
> On Monday, October 30, 2023 at 7:08:47 PM UTC-4 David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>> You can use pip to install a specific version:
>>
>> pip3 install ReviewBoard==5.0.5
>>
>> Building from source is a much more complicated thing, and w
This is a known issue in 6.0, and we'll be putting out a 6.0.1 very soon
that fixes it.
David
On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 8:47 AM geof...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Our reverse proxy is configured to redirect https://ourdomain.com/review
> to ReviewBoard. I have configured nginx to properly host /review/st
Did you set the "server name" in the general settings to include the port
number?
David
On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 12:21 PM geof...@gmail.com
wrote:
> My 1st attempt at setting up ReviewBoard via docker, I tried to host on a
> non-standard port http://ourdomain.com:8900
>
> I configured nginx aprop
.@taitcommunications.com <
> changxing.g...@taitcommunications.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Thanks for your reply.
>> I am using Google Chrome. Firefox has the same issue too.
>>
>> Yes, we are getting this every time.
>> Please see attachment.
&g
mber 2, 2023 at 12:47:10 PM UTC-4 Work Bot wrote:
>
>> Thanks! I will spend some time on these two docs.
>>
>> On Thursday, November 2, 2023 at 11:54:58 AM UTC-4 David Trowbridge wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We do have a guide for this at
>>>
What version of Review Board are you running?
David
On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 8:51 AM noreply optimize <
noreplyoptim...@promaxsaas.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a Ubuntu 18 LTS machine running review board version 2.0.27 without
> any issues. Since, Ubuntu 18 has become EOL I upgraded the machi
not upgraded, it should be
> 2.0.27.
>
> On Thursday, 9 November, 2023 at 9:21:53 pm UTC+5:30 David Trowbridge
> wrote:
>
>> What version of Review Board are you running?
>>
>> David
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 8:51 AM noreply optimize <
>> norepl
This is not possible to do with a single publish. The best way is probably
to assign it only to yourself, do whatever post/publish steps need to
happen, and then change the assigned reviewers to make it public to your
team.
David
On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 9:47 AM geof...@gmail.com
wrote:
> He have
six missing
>>> RBTools 0.7.11 RBTools 0.7.11
>>> paramiko 2.10.2 paramiko2.10.2
>>>
>>> six has been missing. How to install it ?
>>>
>>> On Frida
1 - 100 of 1375 matches
Mail list logo
