Re: RB review Process Automation
Hi Christian,
I'm not able to close the review through HTTP POST, it kept returning error
to login, even though i had logged in just before that.
I'm using a python script with simplejson to do this. I've tried logging in
as the user who submitted the review as well as the admin. But i'm not able
to close the review. Do i need to send any parameters for this HTTP post ?
Request to server: http://IPADDRESS/api/json/accounts/login/
Response from server: {'stat': 'ok'}
Closing the review for Reviewrequest 604...
Close review URL: reviewrequests/604/close/submitted
Request to server: http://
IPADDRESS/api/json/reviewrequests/604/close/submitted/
Response from server: {'stat': 'fail', 'err': {'msg': 'You are not logged
in', 'code': 103}}
Roshan Pius
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 7:37 AM, roshan pius roshanpiustho...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Kunjal,
Perforce has the p4 trigger(
http://www.perforce.com/perforce/doc.current/manuals/cmdref/triggers.html)
mechanism which can be used to run a script post-submission.
So if you want to close the review automatically you could run a script,
which would do the HTTP POST to
/api/json/reviewrequests/id/close/submitted/ as suggested by Christian.
Also if you use change-commit or change-submit triggers you would get
the original changelist numbers itself, before they are changed by Perforce
during submission.
We currently use the change-submit trigger to check the whether the
changelist was shipped before it can be submitted into Perforce.
Roshan Pius
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote:
It is available today. You can do an HTTP POST to
/api/json/reviewrequests/id/close/submitted/
So Kunjal, basically you can write a post-commit hook that automatically
closes the review request. It will require that there's some indication as
to which review request the change is associated with. In Perforce, the
change numbers will themselves change upon submit, but if you knew the
previous change number that was posted to Review Board, you could use the
/api/json/reviewrequests/repository/repositoryid/changenum/changenum/
call to get the info for the review request, pull the ID out of there, and
then use that to call the /close/submitted/ call above.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Chris Clark chris.cl...@ingres.comwrote:
Kunjal wrote:
Once the Review is done, user has to make Review as Close-Submitted
eles reviewers dashboard will still have the review.
We enforce this process on developers and developers are saying that
this is one extra step.
I was thinking whether it is possible to close the review
automatically?
For example, for given Review, if the shipit_count is more then zero
then review is approved and we can close it.
Is there any way to do it programatically?
IMHO having shiptit mark as submitted would not be useful. Where we have
RB reployed Submitted means the code was submitted into source code
control (which is a semi-manual process). What we'd find useful would be a
json call (possibly called from postreview) to mark the review as submitted
(if this is already present please let me know).
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: RB review Process Automation
Hi Kunjal, Perforce has the p4 trigger( http://www.perforce.com/perforce/doc.current/manuals/cmdref/triggers.html) mechanism which can be used to run a script post-submission. So if you want to close the review automatically you could run a script, which would do the HTTP POST to /api/json/reviewrequests/id/close/submitted/ as suggested by Christian. Also if you use change-commit or change-submit triggers you would get the original changelist numbers itself, before they are changed by Perforce during submission. We currently use the change-submit trigger to check the whether the changelist was shipped before it can be submitted into Perforce. Roshan Pius On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: It is available today. You can do an HTTP POST to /api/json/reviewrequests/id/close/submitted/ So Kunjal, basically you can write a post-commit hook that automatically closes the review request. It will require that there's some indication as to which review request the change is associated with. In Perforce, the change numbers will themselves change upon submit, but if you knew the previous change number that was posted to Review Board, you could use the /api/json/reviewrequests/repository/repositoryid/changenum/changenum/ call to get the info for the review request, pull the ID out of there, and then use that to call the /close/submitted/ call above. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Chris Clark chris.cl...@ingres.comwrote: Kunjal wrote: Once the Review is done, user has to make Review as Close-Submitted eles reviewers dashboard will still have the review. We enforce this process on developers and developers are saying that this is one extra step. I was thinking whether it is possible to close the review automatically? For example, for given Review, if the shipit_count is more then zero then review is approved and we can close it. Is there any way to do it programatically? IMHO having shiptit mark as submitted would not be useful. Where we have RB reployed Submitted means the code was submitted into source code control (which is a semi-manual process). What we'd find useful would be a json call (possibly called from postreview) to mark the review as submitted (if this is already present please let me know). Chris -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board 1.0.2 released
Hi Christian, I'm having issues upgrading to the latest 1.02 release, when i try upgrading i get a mesage saying that the latest release ReviewBoard 1.1alpha1.dev-20090916 is already the active version in easy-install.pth is already installed. I was initially running reviewboard from the svn checkout, but i had migrated to the normal install about 2 months back, so i don't know if that history has something to do with this. linux-izbn:~ # easy_install -U ReviewBoard Searching for ReviewBoard Reading http://www.review-board.org/downloads/nightlies/ Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard/ Reading http://www.review-board.org/ Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/ Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ Best match: ReviewBoard 1.1alpha1.dev-20090916 Processing ReviewBoard-1.1alpha1.dev_20090916-py2.6.egg ReviewBoard 1.1alpha1.dev-20090916 is already the active version in easy-install.pth Installing rb-site script to /usr/local/bin Using /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.1alpha1.dev_20090916-py2.6.egg Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/mirror/ Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/nightlies/ Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard Finished processing dependencies for ReviewBoard Thanks, Roshan Pius On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: Hi everyone, We just put out the 1.0.2 release, which contains many bug fixes that users have hit, and improved error logging to help diagnose problems. We strongly encourage everyone to upgrade, and if you hit any new page crashes, we'll probably ask you to upgrade and send us your log file. There's a brief news post at http://review-board.org/news/2009/09/16/review-board-102-released/ Full release notes are up at http://www.review-board.org/docs/releasenotes/dev/reviewboard/1.0.2/ As always, we're looking to fill out our page of Happy Users ( http://review-board.org/users/), so if you use Review Board and can give us permission to list you, please let us know! Thanks, Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: {EnjoyFunWOrld}== HOLLYWOOD Actress boobs collections...
Hi guys,
Am i the only one or has everyone been getting a lot of spam these days
through the reviewboard group ?
Is there any way we can block these spam users from joining the group? We
should have a more thorough user verfication before letting him/her join the
group.
Thanks,
Roshan Pius
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:19 PM, sweety lustylucy...@gmail.com wrote:
{EnjoyFunWOrld}== HOLLYWOOD Actress boobs collections...
{EnjoyFunWOrld}== HOLLYWOOD Actress boobs collections...
Login to downlod more FREE videos, FREE, FREE,
http://www.enjoyfunworld.com
http://www.enjoyfunworld.com
http://www.enjoyfunworld.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: post-review tool
The complete output of post-review -d :
p4 info
repository info: Path: :1666, Base path: None, Supports changesets:
True
Generating diff for changenum 10020
p4 describe -s 10020
Processing edit of //branch/host/src/Assisted File Transfer/AftMain.cpp
Writing //branch/host/src/Assisted File Transfer/AftMain.cpp#1 to
c:\docume~1\rpius\locals~1\temp\tmptkche3
p4 print -q //branch/host/src/Assisted File Transfer/AftMain.cpp#1
p4 where //branch/host/src/Assisted File Transfer/AftMain.cpp
diff -urNp c:\docume~1\rpius\locals~1\temp\tmptkche3 Transfer/AftMain.cpp
Processing edit of //branch/host/src/Assisted File
Transfer/ConfigReader.cpp
Writing //branch/host/src/Assisted File Transfer/ConfigReader.cpp#1 to
c:\docume~1\rpius\locals~1\temp\tmptkche3
p4 print -q //branch/host/src/Assisted File Transfer/ConfigReader.cpp#1
p4 where //branch/host/src/Assisted File Transfer/ConfigReader.cpp
diff -urNp c:\docume~1\rpius\locals~1\temp\tmptkche3
Transfer/ConfigReader.cpp
Processing edit of //branch/host/src/Assisted File Transfer/StdAfx.h
Writing //branch/host/src/Assisted File Transfer/StdAfx.h#1 to
c:\docume~1\rpius\locals~1\temp\tmptkche3
p4 print -q //branch/host/src/Assisted File Transfer/StdAfx.h#1
p4 where //branch/host/src/Assisted File Transfer/StdAfx.h
diff -urNp c:\docume~1\rpius\locals~1\temp\tmptkche3 Transfer/StdAfx.h
Looking for 'xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx /' cookie in C:\Documents and
Settings\username\Local Settings\Application Data\.post-review-cookies.txt
Loaded valid cookie -- no login required
Attempting to create review request for 10020
HTTP POSTing to http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:80/api/json/reviewrequests/new/:
{'repository_path': ':1666', 'changenum': '10020'}
Review request already exists. Updating it...
HTTP POSTing to
http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:80/api/json/reviewrequests/186/update_from_changenum/:
{}
Review request created
Uploading diff, size: 37349
HTTP POSTing to
http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:80/api/json/reviewrequests/186/diff/new/: {}
Review request #186 posted.
http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:80/r/186
Thanks,
Roshan Pius
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Raghu raghu...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you provide the complete output of post-review -d? My first guess
would be that it is due to a space in the file path.
-Raghu
On Apr 13, 10:25 am, roshanpius roshanpiustho...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi ,
I've been using post-review tool for posting reviews for Review Board
for a Perforce Repository. I've integrated the post-review tool into
P4V which is the GUI P4 Client For Windows. This worked fine till now.
But now i've created a new workspace and tried using post-review, but
the diff didn't fetch the file from my hard disk. It was fetching the
correct file from Repository, but not finding the correct edited file
on my Workspace.
I ran post-review with -d flag to get the debug logs and i noticed
that the path on the Workspace that the diff was trying to fetch was
completely wrong:
diff -urNp c:\docume~1\rpius\locals~1\temp\tmpr_q3cf Transfer/
ConfigReader.cpp
It should have been:
diff -urNp c:\docume~1\rpius\locals~1\temp\tmpr_q3cf C:\Unicode\jordan-
unicode\host\src\Assisted File Transfer/ConfigReader.cpp
I'm using post-review with the following arguments in the P4V Client:
python C:\Python26\post-review.py %c --p4-client $c --p4-port $p
Do i need to change something in the post-review Configuration for the
new workspace ?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Reviewboard alpa
Hi , I've run into major issues with post-review as well now. it is not able to post the reviews as well. It keeps retrying and retrying but fails. Thanks, Roshan Pius On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:27 PM, roshan pius roshanpiustho...@gmail.com wrote: VirtualHost *:80 ServerName xxx.xxx.com DocumentRoot /srv/www/htdocs/review-board-evros/htdocs # Error handlers ErrorDocument 500 /errordocs/500.html # Serve django pages Location / PythonPath ['/srv/www/htdocs/review-board-evros/conf'] + sys.path SetEnv DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE reviewboard.settings SetHandler mod_python PythonHandler django.core.handlers.modpython PythonAutoReload Off PythonDebug Off # Used to run multiple mod_python sites in the same apache PythonInterpreter reviewboard_review-board-evros /Location # Serve static media without running it through mod_python # (overrides the above) Location /media SetHandler None /Location Location /errordocs SetHandler None /Location # Alias static media requests to filesystem Alias /media /srv/www/htdocs/review-board-evros/htdocs/media Alias /errordocs /srv/www/htdocs/review-board-evros/htdocs/errordocs /VirtualHost On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hmm. If sounds like the site install went fine. Can you e-mail me the resulting Apache config and the HTML from any page on the site (something generic like the login page would do). It's probably either the site root setting, or Apache is looking in the wrong place for media files. Christian On 1/19/09, roshan pius roshanpiustho...@gmail.com wrote: Hi 1.I'm not using a domain name as of now, running it directly with an IP:(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx).Will get a domain later. But i was running before with direct IP. 2.As is said, i was running the old reviewboard off the svn checkout so i didn't have a rb-site installation so rb-site upgrade is not possible. 3.It is using the same old database( i can see all the members as well as the old review requests, just that the layout is messed). 4.The Symbolic links htdocs/media/ directory(seems to be ok): drwxrwxrwx 3 www-data www-data 4096 Jan 19 20:05 . drwxrwxrwx 3 www-data www-data 4096 Jan 19 20:05 .. lrwxrwxrwx 1 www-data www-data 101 Jan 19 20:05 admin - /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0alpha1-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/media/admin lrwxrwxrwx 1 www-data www-data 80 Jan 19 20:05 djblets - /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.5alpha1-py2.6.egg/djblets/media lrwxrwxrwx 1 www-data www-data 98 Jan 19 20:05 rb - /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0alpha1-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/media/rb drwxrwxrwx 3 www-data www-data 4096 Jan 19 20:05 uploaded 6. When i installed ReviewBoard i used python setup.py install and then did rb-site /srv/www/htdocs/review-board.com 7.For some reason the easy_install had some issues while i was trying yesterday, it was saying it was not able to. That is why i manually downloaded the tar.gz files and installed using python setup.py install On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: A few things I need to know first: 1) Is your Review Board install using its own subdomain, or is it in a directory off a domain? 2) If it's in a directory off a domain, did you specify that directory during the install? 3) Is this using an existing database? 4) Try running rb-site upgrade on the site again. Does that fix the problem? 5) What do the symlinks look like in your site's htdocs/media/ directory? Are they pointing to the right place? 6) When you installed Review Board, did you use setup.py install? 7) What happens when you install via easy_install? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com VMware, Inc. On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:57 AM, roshanpius roshanpiustho...@gmail.com wrote: Hi , I installed the Reviewboard alpha tar.gz file today and installed an instance using rb-site tool as i have been running reviewboard out of my svn checkout till now. But when i restarted my apache server with the new conf file (generated from the rb-site install) and when i tried to login i found the page-media garbled. I mean the colors and the general page layout is messed up. I'm pretty sure it is a minor issue with some media path or permissions or something like that. What exactly do i need to configure for the media? Please Help fast ,lot of people are using it and it is temporarily down because of this issue. Thanks, Roshan Pius -- -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com VMware, Inc. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received
Re: Reviewboard alpa
I added the line to vhosts.conf file Options FollowSymLinks When i tried accessing the http://135.254.219.50/media/ - I got this error on the browser Page not found (404) Request Method: GET Request URL:http://135.254.219.50/error/HTTP_FORBIDDEN.html.var Regards, Roshan Pius On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: That file seems to have some issues. Perhaps the browser tried to normalize the file paths, but they end up looking like: SCRIPT type=text/javascript src=./Dashboard Review Board administration_files/jquery-1.2.6.min.js/SCRIPT There's also a bunch of custom HTML in there, and existing HTML that's modified. Definitely looks like the browser is doing it. Can you look at the source for that file in your browser, find any link or script line, and paste it? Also, what happens if you go to http://yoursite/media/ ? Do you get a 404, or a directory with admin and rb and djblets ? Another thing that could potentially cause this is Apache being configured to block symlinks by default. Try to edit your Apache config and, in the Location /media section, add: Options FollowSymLinks This may fix it. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com VMware, Inc. On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 1:17 AM, roshan pius roshanpiustho...@gmail.com wrote: Hi , The post-review worked once i removed the old cookies file. You may want to also try going to http://yoursite/admin/, logging in, clicking on Settings, and then checking what the Media URL is set to. It should be /media/. If not, you can set this and then click Save. It should all work even if the page styles aren't there. I already tried this and no luck. My media URL is already /media/. I've attached the admin html page. i accessed using the url : http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/admin Thanks, Roshan Pius On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Can you run post-review with -d and attach the debug log? Is it just asking for a password over and over? If so, try deleting ~/.post-review-cookies.txt. I'm imagining the problem is the site root or media root. Can you attach the HTML file of any page on your install? It'll help me determine if this is the cause. If so, we can fix this pretty easily. You may want to also try going to http://yoursite/admin/, logging in, clicking on Settings, and then checking what the Media URL is set to. It should be /media/. If not, you can set this and then click Save. It should all work even if the page styles aren't there. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com VMware, Inc. On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:51 AM, roshan pius roshanpiustho...@gmail.com wrote: Hi , I've run into major issues with post-review as well now. it is not able to post the reviews as well. It keeps retrying and retrying but fails. Thanks, Roshan Pius On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:27 PM, roshan pius roshanpiustho...@gmail.com wrote: VirtualHost *:80 ServerName xxx.xxx.com DocumentRoot /srv/www/htdocs/review-board-evros/htdocs # Error handlers ErrorDocument 500 /errordocs/500.html # Serve django pages Location / PythonPath ['/srv/www/htdocs/review-board-evros/conf'] + sys.path SetEnv DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE reviewboard.settings SetHandler mod_python PythonHandler django.core.handlers.modpython PythonAutoReload Off PythonDebug Off # Used to run multiple mod_python sites in the same apache PythonInterpreter reviewboard_review-board-evros /Location # Serve static media without running it through mod_python # (overrides the above) Location /media SetHandler None /Location Location /errordocs SetHandler None /Location # Alias static media requests to filesystem Alias /media /srv/www/htdocs/review-board-evros/htdocs/media Alias /errordocs /srv/www/htdocs/review-board-evros/htdocs/errordocs /VirtualHost On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hmm. If sounds like the site install went fine. Can you e-mail me the resulting Apache config and the HTML from any page on the site (something generic like the login page would do). It's probably either the site root setting, or Apache is looking in the wrong place for media files. Christian On 1/19/09, roshan pius roshanpiustho...@gmail.com wrote: Hi 1.I'm not using a domain name as of now, running it directly with an IP:(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx).Will get a domain later. But i was running before with direct IP. 2.As is said, i was running
Re: Reviewboard alpa
Hi 1.I'm not using a domain name as of now, running it directly with an IP:(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx).Will get a domain later. But i was running before with direct IP. 2.As is said, i was running the old reviewboard off the svn checkout so i didn't have a rb-site installation so rb-site upgrade is not possible. 3.It is using the same old database( i can see all the members as well as the old review requests, just that the layout is messed). 4.The Symbolic links htdocs/media/ directory(seems to be ok): drwxrwxrwx 3 www-data www-data 4096 Jan 19 20:05 . drwxrwxrwx 3 www-data www-data 4096 Jan 19 20:05 .. lrwxrwxrwx 1 www-data www-data 101 Jan 19 20:05 admin - /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0alpha1-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/media/admin lrwxrwxrwx 1 www-data www-data 80 Jan 19 20:05 djblets - /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.5alpha1-py2.6.egg/djblets/media lrwxrwxrwx 1 www-data www-data 98 Jan 19 20:05 rb - /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0alpha1-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/media/rb drwxrwxrwx 3 www-data www-data 4096 Jan 19 20:05 uploaded 6. When i installed ReviewBoard i used python setup.py install and then did rb-site /srv/www/htdocs/review-board.com 7.For some reason the easy_install had some issues while i was trying yesterday, it was saying it was not able to. That is why i manually downloaded the tar.gz files and installed using python setup.py install On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: A few things I need to know first: 1) Is your Review Board install using its own subdomain, or is it in a directory off a domain? 2) If it's in a directory off a domain, did you specify that directory during the install? 3) Is this using an existing database? 4) Try running rb-site upgrade on the site again. Does that fix the problem? 5) What do the symlinks look like in your site's htdocs/media/ directory? Are they pointing to the right place? 6) When you installed Review Board, did you use setup.py install? 7) What happens when you install via easy_install? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com VMware, Inc. On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:57 AM, roshanpius roshanpiustho...@gmail.com wrote: Hi , I installed the Reviewboard alpha tar.gz file today and installed an instance using rb-site tool as i have been running reviewboard out of my svn checkout till now. But when i restarted my apache server with the new conf file (generated from the rb-site install) and when i tried to login i found the page-media garbled. I mean the colors and the general page layout is messed up. I'm pretty sure it is a minor issue with some media path or permissions or something like that. What exactly do i need to configure for the media? Please Help fast ,lot of people are using it and it is temporarily down because of this issue. Thanks, Roshan Pius --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
