Hi Christian -- thanks for the detailed reply. So to explain the request in
more detail:
We have no concern about the Summary field, nor the repo name or branch.
It's really only the Description field we care about because it contains
potentially unbounded amounts of text, and maybe sensitive
; def initialize(self):
> IntegrationHook(self, MySlackIntegration)
>
>
> Christian
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 8:03 AM Ben ST >
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I am experimenting with the Slack integration (RB 3.0.15). Currently all
>> of
Hi
I am experimenting with the Slack integration (RB 3.0.15). Currently all of
the RB Description body is sent to Slack. Is there a way to limit the post
just to the Summary?
For confidentiality/security reasons our system admins don't want code
posted into Slack channels, at least not by an
If Review Board is set up to only use local Git repositories, would it ever
contact the remote Git server? Do I need to specify the remote URL in the
mirror path?
I'm just trying to simplify my configuration to eliminate scope for network
and/or authentication issues. In the Repository admin
o determine what numbers are best for your
> scale (and how many Docker instances you plan to run). It doesn't look like
> the image natively supports customizing this, so you'll probably have to
> fork the image.
>
> Christian
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 8:39 AM Ben ST &g
