The profiling information that's added by that setting is extremely
verbose, and there's no way to enable it globally for all requests short of
patching the code.
If you set your log level to debug, Review Board will log timing
information for a number of aspects of the diff generation, including
the web UI?
>
> Caleb
>
> On Tuesday, September 17, 2024 at 10:40:03 AM UTC-4 David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>> Caleb,
>>
>> Multi-commit review requests are created from the command-line tools.
>> Depending on your version control system, there are many different ways
Caleb,
Multi-commit review requests are created from the command-line tools.
Depending on your version control system, there are many different ways
that you can select which commits you want to post, with the most common
being to post everything between the upstream branch and your local branch
h
this for
> every hosting service like github bitbucket etc.
> On Thursday 29 August 2024 at 11:43:09 UTC-4 David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>> Actually, I'm not sure what happened to the original message. Google
>> groups sometimes seems to remove data and I don't know why.
>&
e(
username=username,
hosting_url=gitlab_server_url,
private_token=gitlab_acc_token,
service_id='gitlab'
)
David
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 8:33 AM David Trowbridge wrote:
> You had sent it to both the reviewboard and reviewboard-dev lists. I
> moderated one messag
deleted?
>
> On Wednesday 14 August 2024 at 11:54:27 UTC-4 FeedJ wrote:
>
>> [image: Screenshot 2024-08-14 115239.png]
>> Looks like we are using the latest version.
>> On Wednesday 14 August 2024 at 11:40:19 UTC-4 David Trowbridge wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>
Hi,
Definitely a bug. We'll get a fix in for 7.0.2.
David
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 10:09 AM Minh Huy Vo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of our reviewboard users complains that when he's viewing a
> ReviewBoard email in plain text mode, he's also seeing the html syntax. I
> can confirm this. Attached are 2
Hi,
Looks like we've got a bug in the hosting service account resource.
What version of Review Board are you using?
David
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 9:35 AM FeedJ wrote:
> Hi, I am currently trying to write python automation scripts to try and
> automatically add hosting services account without
The post-commit (post-push) UI is only implemented for certain hosting
services where we have both the APIs we need and the demand from users to
implement it. For the vast majority of cases, our workflow recommendation
is to use rbtools to review code before it gets landed into a central
repository
The raw file mask is essentially a format string, which the server uses to
create the URL to fetch blob content. It should explicitly have
"" and "" in it, not a specific file or revision.
So for your case, it should be "http://myserverurl/cgit/myrepo/blob/
?id="
David
On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 6:0
Can you tell us what you have set in /admin/settings/storage/ (minus any
secret keys)?
David
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 11:49 AM Minh Huy Vo wrote:
> As a workaround, I removed avatars information via the Admin UI and users
> are able to access ReviewBoard again.
>
> For other users who don't have
We've seen this kind of behavior before with some misconfigurations. Would
you be able to share your LDAP configuration in Review Board, and let us
know if your LDAP server is configured to allow anonymous binds?
David
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 8:40 PM 胡一辉 wrote:
> Hello:
>
> In our ReviewBoard
anks again!
>
> On Tuesday, April 23, 2024 at 2:17:17 PM UTC-4 David Trowbridge wrote:
>
> You definitely need to make sure that everything is using the same Python
> version. In particular, if you're using something like Apache, you need to
> make sure that your mod_wsg
tive. Bumping 2.5.16
> to 6 means I'd have to switch to python 3. When I tried upgrading to 4 I
> found an issue where it was conflicting between using 2 and 3. Perhaps I
> was doing something wrong?
>
> Thanks!
> Gabe
>
> On Monday, April 22, 2024 at 5:08:31 PM UT
The "taking a nap" error means that Review Board is crashing somewhere. Can
you check the reviewboard and web server logs for errors?
I'd definitely suggest just going straight from your original version to
your target version (preferably 6). Doing upgrades to intermediate versions
is not necessar
When sending data to the API, you need to use form-data rather than JSON.
So your curl call would look more like:
curl ...args. -F name=test -F tool=git
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 9:56 AM 刘天明 wrote:
> ReviewBoard version: 6.0.2
> i wan use rest api create repository
> document：
> https://www.revi
Yakir,
We do have the ability for extensions to add additional content to various
pages. There are a number of defined hook points within the review request
box. See
https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/latest/extending/extensions/hooks/template-hook/#template-hook
for
details.
David
On Thu,
Lasse,
You'll need to configure users for Power Pack at
/admin/extensions/rbpowerpack.extension.PowerPackExtension/config/
David
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:34 AM Lasse Bonner wrote:
> When trying to upload a diff file manually I get this error:
> You are not licensed to post review requests ag
Can you check what the cache configuration is at /admin/settings/general/ ?
David
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:34 AM Szymon Niemiec
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> We are using latest reviewboard and we've recently migrated to Docker
> setup. Problem is, reviewboard randomly spits error 500 while brow
Florian,
The rbchecklist codebase is quite ancient and really needs a full rewrite.
Those discarded changes were from student projects and we decided we didn't
particularly want to be landing changes when we knew that the underlying
design had some fundamental flaws.
I'd love to be able to spend
7;m curious (and a bit confused):
> I head a look at
> https://github.com/reviewboard/reviewboard/blob/release-6.0.2/contrib/docker/Dockerfile
> and found that pysvn building and installation already is there. Does that
> mean that the official docker image is being built using another
> reviewboard_1 | [2024-03-04 15:43:51 +] [15] [INFO] Using worker:
> gthread
> reviewboard_1 | [2024-03-04 15:43:51 +0000] [16] [INFO] Booting worker
> with pid: 16
> reviewboard_1 | [2024-03-04 15:43:51 +] [17] [INFO] Booting worker
> with pid: 17
> reviewboard_1 | [
Florian,
If you're seeing "missing support" in the list, it's because pysvn isn't
loaded correctly. You'll still be able to create/edit repositories but they
won't actually work until that's fixed. Recreating the repository
configurations won't change that, and deleting a repository entry will
del
Florian,
You probably had subvertpy installed previously. Review Board 6 has removed
the subvertpy backend because it caused significant problems. You'll need
to install PySVN. We have a guide for doing that at
https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/latest/admin/installation/linux/#installing-svn
Parameters to PUT and POST operations in the API need to be specified as
form-data, not query parameters or JSON. This can be done with the -F
parameter to curl:
curl -H "Authorization: ..." -H "Accept: ..." -X PUT-F "email="
https:///api/users//
David
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 10:45 AM Lyova Pogos
Hi,
It looks like your server name is set to "https://example.com"; in the
Review Board General Settings page. SAML requires the server name to be set
correctly to whatever domain your IdP is expecting.
David
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 9:23 AM Enzo wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I was wondering if anyone ha
Looking into this, your GitLab version is quite old. We've verified that
this works correctly with modern versions.
David
On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 3:54 PM Christian Hammond
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the report. The exception information is very helpful!
>
> We’ll look into what changed in GitL
Hi,
This is a known issue and will be fixed in 6.0.2
David
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 1:18 AM Mikalai Ananenka wrote:
> Hello,
> Although this is minor issue, it can affect user experience, so I thought
> you might want to fix it. RB 6.0.1.
>
> Ensure you are logged in and then click "Log out" pop
request which uses Subversion → Update → Update Diff).
>
> On Thursday, December 28, 2023 at 9:35:39 PM UTC+3 David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We have a fix for this issue and will be shipping 6.0.2 soon.
>>
>> David
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 28
e
> the clone. The compatibility issues are very severe.
>
> Thanks! I appreciate the help!
>
> On Monday, December 18, 2023 at 5:39:23 PM UTC-6 David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> You shouldn't need to install 2.5.7. If you install your desired version
&g
Hi,
You shouldn't need to install 2.5.7. If you install your desired version on
your target host, then move the database and data directory over, you
should be able to run `rb-site upgrade`.
David
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 4:35 PM Grover D wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am running a very old version of R
If Review Board is configured to use AD, it will try that first for all
users. If that authentication fails, then it will use the database
password. Assuming those users have AD accounts, you shouldn't need to do
anything--they'll be able to log in with their AD credentials. You can
enforce this by
'ProtocolError('Connection
>> aborted.', error(104, 'Connection reset by peer'))': /simple/six/
>> WARNING: Retrying (Retry(total=0, connect=None, read=None, redirect=None,
>> status=None)) after connection broken by 'ProtocolError('Connecti
six missing
>>> RBTools 0.7.11 RBTools 0.7.11
>>> paramiko 2.10.2 paramiko2.10.2
>>>
>>> six has been missing. How to install it ?
>>>
>>> On Frida
This is not possible to do with a single publish. The best way is probably
to assign it only to yourself, do whatever post/publish steps need to
happen, and then change the assigned reviewers to make it public to your
team.
David
On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 9:47 AM geof...@gmail.com
wrote:
> He have
not upgraded, it should be
> 2.0.27.
>
> On Thursday, 9 November, 2023 at 9:21:53 pm UTC+5:30 David Trowbridge
> wrote:
>
>> What version of Review Board are you running?
>>
>> David
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 8:51 AM noreply optimize <
>> norepl
What version of Review Board are you running?
David
On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 8:51 AM noreply optimize <
noreplyoptim...@promaxsaas.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a Ubuntu 18 LTS machine running review board version 2.0.27 without
> any issues. Since, Ubuntu 18 has become EOL I upgraded the machi
mber 2, 2023 at 12:47:10 PM UTC-4 Work Bot wrote:
>
>> Thanks! I will spend some time on these two docs.
>>
>> On Thursday, November 2, 2023 at 11:54:58 AM UTC-4 David Trowbridge wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We do have a guide for this at
>>>
.@taitcommunications.com <
> changxing.g...@taitcommunications.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Thanks for your reply.
>> I am using Google Chrome. Firefox has the same issue too.
>>
>> Yes, we are getting this every time.
>> Please see attachment.
&g
Did you set the "server name" in the general settings to include the port
number?
David
On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 12:21 PM geof...@gmail.com
wrote:
> My 1st attempt at setting up ReviewBoard via docker, I tried to host on a
> non-standard port http://ourdomain.com:8900
>
> I configured nginx aprop
This is a known issue in 6.0, and we'll be putting out a 6.0.1 very soon
that fixes it.
David
On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 8:47 AM geof...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Our reverse proxy is configured to redirect https://ourdomain.com/review
> to ReviewBoard. I have configured nginx to properly host /review/st
e?
>
> Thanks so much!
>
> On Monday, October 30, 2023 at 7:08:47 PM UTC-4 David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>> You can use pip to install a specific version:
>>
>> pip3 install ReviewBoard==5.0.5
>>
>> Building from source is a much more complicated thing, and w
Hi,
It's saying "connection refused", which indicates there's some problem with
the network between you and your Review Board server.
David
On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 9:27 PM min cai wrote:
> when i use reviewboard I got two errors，
> the First one,when i edit the draft review,but i cant save the
l a specific version of RB (for example 5.0.5)
> instead of the latest one. I think I figured out a workaround through
> python setup.py file,
>
> On Thursday, October 12, 2023 at 2:34:15 PM UTC-4 David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there a reason why you're l
Changxing,
A couple questions about this:
- What browser(s) are you using?
- Are you getting this every time, or is this an intermittent failure?
- Can you open your browser's developer tools and see if there are any
errors on the JavaScript console?
Thanks,
David
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 10:07 A
Ethan,
That's definitely a bug. We'll be turning out a 6.0.1 soon and will get a
fix in for that.
If your company has a support contract with us, please reach out through
that channel and we can get you a preview build.
David
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 1:00 PM Ethan Nguyen wrote:
> I did some di
Hi,
Is there a reason why you're looking to install from the git repository
instead of the published releases? The install documentation you linked to
should be the correct process for most people.
David
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 12:30 PM Work Bot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to find instruction
Hi,
That should be the correct setting to change. You probably need to restart
the web server in order for that change to take effect.
David
On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 7:49 AM Gianluca Busiello <
gianluca.busie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm running RB v4.x and I'm affected by the error:
>
> API Error
> have to check again.
>
> Thanks again for your response.
> Erin
>
> Sent from my Atari 2600
>
> On Jun 27, 2023, at 18:31, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>
> Erin,
>
> Review Board is built on Python, not PHP. If you're seeing something else,
> it'
Erin,
Review Board is built on Python, not PHP. If you're seeing something else,
it's likely that the web server still has some default configuration for
the domain/virtualhost active.
David
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 6:33 PM Erin Keegan wrote:
> I went through the install directions, but when I
Kerry,
The first thing to do is verify the network configuration on the Review
Board server. It’s the server which is experiencing these timeouts.
If you don’t need DMARC for your emails, you could also change the settings
for email delivery to avoid the DNS lookup here. That said, if DNS is
unre
Becky,
Thanks for the report. We'll get this fixed up for the next 5.0.x release.
David
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 11:17 AM 'Becky Wong' via Review Board Community <
reviewboard@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was interested in using the automatic login feature and poked through
> the cod
Adam,
SECRET_KEY is necessary, and needs to be the same between the two servers.
The missing Site sounds like something didn't work right migrating the
database.
David
On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 4:55 AM Adam Weremczuk wrote:
> ...or perhaps the SECRET_KEY feature can be disabled?
>
> On Tue, 4 Apr
It sounds like perhaps you imported the data from a 3.0.18 database into
the database schema of 4.0.2
You'll want to drop the database entirely, import the dump, then run the
rb-site upgrade command.
On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 1:11 PM Adam Weremczuk wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a production server ha
The mailing list field expects a single address to use for a distribution
list. If you leave it blank, emails will be sent addressed to all members
of the group individually.
David
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 5:21 AM Chanson Joy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to create a review group, the optional mailin
Hi,
The problem is not on the client, but on the Review Board server's
connection to your SVN server:
>
> Error data: {'err': {'code': 207, 'msg': 'The file was not found in the
> repository.'}, 'file': '/X3240/trunk/API/mtd/mtdHunit.c', 'revision':
> '12399', 'stat': 'fail'}
>
You'll need to lo
pv6 (normal behavior?) and failed.
> Adding '-l ::1' fixed it.
>
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 9:27 AM Chanson Joy wrote:
> Identical issue, I have windows 10 with WSL2 Ubuntu, please help.
>
> On Monday, October 17, 2022 at 9:01:04 AM UTC-7 David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>>
was made over ipv6 (normal behavior?) and failed.
> Adding '-l ::1' fixed it.
>
David
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 9:27 AM Chanson Joy wrote:
> and why is that ? i have a fresh install, having the same issue.
>
> On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 9:40:14 AM UTC-7 David Trowbridge
Kerry,
Glad you got it working. We’re seriously considering dropping support for
subvertpy, as it has grown increasingly buggy over the last few years. This
sounds like another data point in favor of that.
David
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 10:35 AM Kerry Groeschel
wrote:
> You can disregard my la
Hi,
It looks like it’s failing to connect to your configured memcached server.
David
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 6:51 AM Владислав Болашев
wrote:
> Hello. I try to run a RB, but have a problem
>
> [2023-03-13 12:08:25 +0300] [65554] [INFO] Starting gunicorn 20.1.0
> [2023-03-13 12:08:25 +0300] [6
Mark,
`rbt land` does assume that your working branch has a different name than
your tracking branch--that is, that you'd have origin/X, X, and then some
local-only named branch. `rbt land` would then handle stamping and merging
from local-only to X (and optionally pushing). We've found that's usu
es were excluded from the patch.
>
> Successfully applied patch.
>
>
>
> I found another way to do it using --print:
>
> rbt patch --print 260437 > 260437.diff
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rama
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* reviewboard@google
Rama,
If you want to save the patch to a file, you can do that with rbt patch:
rbt patch --write 1234.diff 1234
By default, that will grab the latest diff. If you want a specific revision
you can use --diff-revision
David
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 10:54 AM 'Ramakrishnan P R' via Review Board
Com
ember 16, 2022 at 1:52:45 PM UTC-8 David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>> How are you running the tests? Have you set up a development environment?
>>
>> David
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 1:22 PM Shubha Ramani
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Using Py
Hi,
I'm not sure why the ubuntu package isn't working--that looks correct
(perhaps there's a python version conflict somewhere). Confusingly, the
"pysvn" package on PyPI is not the same thing as the older pysvn, and is a
new package that someone created and managed to claim the name since the
orig
Hi,
This is not possible from the UI. You'll need to use RBTools to do this.
David
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 10:08 AM yoimnewhere hello
wrote:
> Hey, I want to create review requests that have multiple commits for each
> review request.
> Is that possible over the UI?
> Right now, I can only cre
How are you running the tests? Have you set up a development environment?
David
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 1:22 PM Shubha Ramani
wrote:
> Using Python 3.7 and installed all the dependencies including django 1.11
> I am trying to run test_ldap_auth_backend.py and keep getting the error:
> django.co
Yes, you can move directly to a new version. What you'll need to do is copy
over the old site directory and move the database. Once everything is set
up, start by running `rb-site /path/to/site upgrade` to handle the schema
changes.
David
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 7:08 PM 胡一辉 wrote:
> The reviewb
The issue is that a newer release of django-braces dropped support for
Python 2, and 3.0.11 was not specific about pinning the version needed. You
can manually install django-braces==1.13.0, but I wouldn't be surprised if
that just moves the error down to another package. 3.0.11 is quite old and
wi
Reena,
The .reviewboardrc file configures rbtools, but you'll also need to make
sure that the repository is configured on the server within the Review
Board admin UI. Has it been added there?
David
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 7:17 PM Reena THOMAS
wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
>
>
> I’m unable to find the re
Adam,
This is a long-standing limitation of the current API. We're planning on
adding a new resource soon to query reviews across all review requests.
There is an extension that we've used internally that adds a new API
endpoint to do this. It's not well documented but perhaps it could serve as
a
For Git, in addition to the clone URL, you'll need to have some kind of
front-end that supports full-file fetching such as cgit, gitweb, or
rb-gateway. The git protocol alone isn't sufficient for Review Board's
needs.
See
https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/4.0/admin/configuration/repositories
You can update this by going to the admin site and clicking "General" under
"Settings". Change the "Server" field (and perhaps the media/static URLs if
necessary) to be https instead of http.
David
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 10:31 AM Manoj Sharma
wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> We've recently migrated ou
Can you run with --debug and send the output?
David
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 7:34 PM Dan Beygelman wrote:
> Hi,
> i get this error when i run rbt post command
> #> /usr/bin/rbt post
> Unexpected error loading command post: name 'platform_system' is not
> defined
>
> #> /usr/bin/rbt --versio
>
There's definitely some kind of change that happened. You may find a better
traceback in the log file. Probably some dependency got upgraded somehow,
or a previously installed but non-active extension got enabled.
That said, "1.4" is not a version of Review Board. If you mean 1.5.x, those
versions
Josh,
The RPM hasn't been maintained in a very long time. Installing via the
python toolchain is the best way to get running and stay up to date.
David
On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 11:25 AM Josh Davis wrote:
> We have upgraded all of our servers to RHEL8 and I am trying to get
> ReviewBoard installe
rver's version in this case because it
> is hosted by https://rbcommons.com/
>
> thanks,
> Pratyush
>
> On Thursday, December 16, 2021 at 1:12:58 PM UTC+5:30 David Trowbridge
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It sounds like you’re using a version of Review Boa
Hi,
It sounds like you’re using a version of Review Board from before we added
multi-commit support, and abusing the interdiff feature (which is intended
to show changes between revisions of a code change) to instead show the
changes between your commits.
What version of Review Board and RBTools
Hi,
I'm not very familiar with Allura but it looks like it's a different
category than Review Board. Review Board focuses on code review, whereas
Allura is repository hosting, wikis, and bug tracking.
David
On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 12:48 AM mavavilj
wrote:
> Anyone else who looked at Apache All
Hi,
You need to create an extension, which is a full python package that can be
installed alongside Review Board. Details on how to do this are in the
manual:
https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/4.0/extending/
David
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 9:21 PM 'liudaolunhuibl' via Review Board Community
The correct module is "mysqlclient". I'd suggest doing "pip install -U
ReviewBoard[mysql]" to ensure you get everything correct. See the
installation instructions at
https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/4.0/admin/installation/linux/#id2
David
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 9:15 AM hao zheng wrote:
Stuart,
While it's theoretically possible to develop against an installed package,
you'll generally have much better success if you set up a dev environment.
See
https://www.notion.so/reviewboard/Getting-Started-da208d46de1d47d8b38e8b5ddcb3dd44
for details.
David
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 9:56 AM S
Hi,
Can you run with —debug and send us the output?
David
On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 8:52 PM gaurav chauhan
wrote:
> Hi,
> when i am running "rbt post", bellow error is coming. I am using rbt tools
> in centos 7
> Error -> " Unknown error, 'platform_system' is not defined "
>
> --
> Supercharge y
hon3.7/dist-packages/rbtools/api/transport/sync.py",
> line 91, in _execute_request
> rsp = self.server.make_request(request)
> File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/rbtools/api/request.py",
> line 815, in make_request
> self.process_error(e.code, e.read()
Hi,
Would you mind running your rbt command with --debug and including the
output?
Can you share how the repository is configured in the Review Board admin
site?
David
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 8:01 AM Peter Šilon wrote:
> My .reviewboardrc. RB version 4.0.3
>
> REVIEWBOARD_URL = "http://wskkosd0
For both errors, would you be able to run with --debug and send us the
output?
What version of RBTools and Review Board?
David
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 10:22 AM Gyanendra Prakash <
gyanendraprakash...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am facing this problem: "The repository path specified is not in the
> li
s
> so I don't believe I have any log files.
>
> It's not clear to me if it does not like some of the parameters I am using
> for the repo definition, or whether something is down at RBCommons.
>
> On Monday, June 7, 2021 at 11:28:36 PM UTC-7 David Trowbridge wrote:
>
Hi,
You'll need to check the log files to see what's happening. Just getting a
503 doesn't really tell us much.
David
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 12:18 AM Marcel Samek wrote:
> I have been trying to add a repository today, but when I submit the form,
> it hangs for a really long time and then event
It looks like the built-in tools did not get properly registered. The usual
culprit is some kind of dependency conflict. The first thing to do is check
your log files for any errors, especially anything that looks like
"VersionConflict"
Once anything you've found is fixed, you can re-register the
Can you look in the Review Board and/or web server log files?
David
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 6:31 PM Mike Basov wrote:
> Hello guys!
>
> I have just installed ReviewBoard 4.0.1 on my Ubuntu 20.04 VM and always
> see Error 500 when I am trying to open review board in the configured
> localhost.
>
It sounds like static media is not being properly served by your web server.
As Christian mentioned, 2.5.x is end-of-life, and the RPM is no longer
maintained. We won’t be able to provide any further help if you’re going to
be using this version/install method.
David
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 7:0
Hi,
Rather than trying to build this yourself using webhooks, I'd suggest
trying out the rb-integrations 2.0 beta1 release, which includes a jenkins
integration:
https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/rbintegrations/2.0-beta-1/
https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/4.0/admin/integrations
Jake,
We don’t use pull requests (unfortunately GitHub doesn’t let us turn them
off). All contributions need to go to https://reviews.reviewboard.org/
Thanks,
David
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 7:56 AM Jake Stine wrote:
> Basic jist seems to be that it's an isolated problem specifically to
> git+
Teddy,
If you're viewing a diff that you had previously viewed before the upgrade,
it's likely that old data may still be in cache. I'd suggest restarting
your memcached service, clearing your browser cache, and then trying again.
David
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 7:48 AM teds...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I'm guessing you're referring to the commits that show up when you go to
the "New Review Request" page. What you should do is configure Review Board
with the remote address of your SVN server, rather than with the local SVN
checkout.
David
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:39 AM Rameez Bhimani
wro
It looks like your web server is unable to find the "p4" executable. We've
mostly moved away from requiring that but it seems like accepting
certificates still uses it.
David
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 9:16 AM Glen Banyard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So I have set up Perforce on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS and installed
Is it possible that people are editing the repository entries in the admin
UI? Saved passwords in forms will often get overwritten or erased by
overeager browser autofill.
David
On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 6:31 AM vale...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we are using Gitlib server which is connected t
/apache-wsgi.conf
> reviews.example.com.conf
> $ cd ../sites-enabled
> $ ln -s ../sites-available/reviews.example.com.conf
>
> My apache server does not start after this!
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 4:17 AM David Trowbridge
> wrote:
&g
ar. 17 nov. 2020 à 21:15, David Trowbridge a
> écrit :
>
>> First of all, it's possible that this is a bug which has been fixed since
>> 3.0.8 (I don't know off the top of my head, but I know that we've found and
>> fixed several unicode-related issues over th
pip
>
> Now rb-site install returns error command not found.
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 11:42 AM David Trowbridge
> wrote:
>
>> This sounds like you have not actually installed the Review Board package
>> on your system. Can you explain what st
1 - 100 of 1376 matches
Mail list logo
