Re: reviewboard.settings lost?
Through trial and error and re-installing (easy_install just doesn't work for me) tracked it down to the Reviewboard egg entry missing from easy-install.pth (removed it trying to solve another problem, which didn't work). Once the Reviewboard egg entry was added back to easy- install.pth the website works fine. On Aug 26, 1:52 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: It's a file called settings.py inside the reviewboard/ directory. It's not something you should ever have to even know about. If anything was ever wrong with the file, then your installation is basically corrupt or something. Can you show me your server's configuration file? Also, try deleting your reviewboard*.egg directories in /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages and re-installing it. It's possible that for whatever reason, that directory is no longer in your Python include path. Redoing easy_install should guarantee it goes into the path. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:15 AM, tag_98007work tag98007w...@gmail.comwrote: RB is definitely installed for Python 2.5. So is reviewboard.settings a file? I've done a find . -name reviewboard.settings in /usr/lib/ python2.5 and /var/www/reviewboard and the file is not there. As far as I know until the restart on Sunday, no files have been changed. What do I need to do to fix this? Do I need to re-install? Guidence would be appreciated. Thanks On Aug 24, 3:26 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: reviewboard.settings is part of Review Board itself. It could be that your install is broken or your web server is pointing to the wrong path. The file itself does not change, so the syntax errors warning shouldn't be a concern. Another thing to make sure is that Review Board is installed for Python 2.5 and not some other version. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:30 PM, tag_98007work tag98007w...@gmail.com wrote: I've been running Reviewboard 1.5 RC1 for about a week. According to the logs sometime Sunday morning there was a restart, after that I'm getting the messages: Error log: [Sun Aug 22 08:03:41 2010] [notice] SIGUSR1 received. Doing graceful restart /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycrypto-2.2-py2.5-linux-i686.egg/ Crypto/Util/randpool.py:40: RandomPool_DeprecationWarning: This application uses RandomPool, which is BROKEN in older releases. See http://www.pycrypto.org/randpool-broken RandomPool_DeprecationWarning) /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycrypto-2.2-py2.5-linux-i686.egg/ Crypto/Util/randpool.py:40: RandomPool_DeprecationWarning: This application uses RandomPool, which is BROKEN in older releases. See http://www.pycrypto.org/randpool-broken RandomPool_DeprecationWarning) [Sun Aug 22 08:03:41 2010] [notice] mod_python: Creating 8 session mutexes based on 3 max processes and 25 max threads. [Sun Aug 22 08:03:41 2010] [notice] mod_python: using mutex_directory / tmp [Sun Aug 22 08:03:42 2010] [notice] Apache/2.2.9 (Debian) mod_python/ 3.3.1 Python/2.5.2 configured -- resuming normal operations [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] mod_python (pid=12535, interpreter='reviewboard_reviewboard', phase='PythonHandler', handler='django.core.handlers.modpython'): Application error, referer:http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] ServerName: 'reviewboard', referer:http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] DocumentRoot: '/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs', referer: http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] URI: '/ reviews/api/json/reviewrequests/17/last-update/', referer: http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] Location: '/ reviews/', referer:http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] Directory: None, referer:http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] Filename: '/ var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/reviews', referer: http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] PathInfo: '/ api/json/reviewrequests/17/last-update/', referer: http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] Traceback (most recent call last):, referer:http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] File / usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages
Re: reviewboard.settings lost?
RB is definitely installed for Python 2.5. So is reviewboard.settings a file? I've done a find . -name reviewboard.settings in /usr/lib/ python2.5 and /var/www/reviewboard and the file is not there. As far as I know until the restart on Sunday, no files have been changed. What do I need to do to fix this? Do I need to re-install? Guidence would be appreciated. Thanks On Aug 24, 3:26 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: reviewboard.settings is part of Review Board itself. It could be that your install is broken or your web server is pointing to the wrong path. The file itself does not change, so the syntax errors warning shouldn't be a concern. Another thing to make sure is that Review Board is installed for Python 2.5 and not some other version. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:30 PM, tag_98007work tag98007w...@gmail.comwrote: I've been running Reviewboard 1.5 RC1 for about a week. According to the logs sometime Sunday morning there was a restart, after that I'm getting the messages: Error log: [Sun Aug 22 08:03:41 2010] [notice] SIGUSR1 received. Doing graceful restart /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycrypto-2.2-py2.5-linux-i686.egg/ Crypto/Util/randpool.py:40: RandomPool_DeprecationWarning: This application uses RandomPool, which is BROKEN in older releases. See http://www.pycrypto.org/randpool-broken RandomPool_DeprecationWarning) /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycrypto-2.2-py2.5-linux-i686.egg/ Crypto/Util/randpool.py:40: RandomPool_DeprecationWarning: This application uses RandomPool, which is BROKEN in older releases. See http://www.pycrypto.org/randpool-broken RandomPool_DeprecationWarning) [Sun Aug 22 08:03:41 2010] [notice] mod_python: Creating 8 session mutexes based on 3 max processes and 25 max threads. [Sun Aug 22 08:03:41 2010] [notice] mod_python: using mutex_directory / tmp [Sun Aug 22 08:03:42 2010] [notice] Apache/2.2.9 (Debian) mod_python/ 3.3.1 Python/2.5.2 configured -- resuming normal operations [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] mod_python (pid=12535, interpreter='reviewboard_reviewboard', phase='PythonHandler', handler='django.core.handlers.modpython'): Application error, referer:http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] ServerName: 'reviewboard', referer:http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] DocumentRoot: '/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs', referer: http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] URI: '/ reviews/api/json/reviewrequests/17/last-update/', referer: http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] Location: '/ reviews/', referer:http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] Directory: None, referer:http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] Filename: '/ var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/reviews', referer: http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] PathInfo: '/ api/json/reviewrequests/17/last-update/', referer: http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] Traceback (most recent call last):, referer:http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] File / usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py, line 1537, in HandlerDispatch\n default=default_handler, arg=req, silent=hlist.silent), referer:http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] File / usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py, line 1229, in _process_target\n result = _execute_target(config, req, object, arg), referer:http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] File / usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py, line 1128, in _execute_target\n result = object(arg), referer: http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] File / usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.5.egg/django/core/ handlers/modpython.py, line 228, in handler\n return ModPythonHandler()(req), referer:http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] File / usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.5.egg/django/core/ handlers/modpython.py, line 191, in __call__\n self.load_middleware(), referer:http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] File / usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django
Re: post-review and P4PASSWD
I was having P4PASSWD issues until I patched the perforce.py file with the changes from http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1537/diff/. After I patched the file I restarted the server (don't know if that's needed or not) On Aug 25, 8:56 am, RShelley 12gaugeme...@gmail.com wrote: I've been struggling recently getting post-review to pick up the P4PASSWD properly. We have post-review as part of a script and we first run p4 login -p to get a ticket and then put that ticket in the environment. Subsequent p4 describe -P ticket changelist commands work fine, but post-review gives the P4PASSWORD is invalid or unset error. I've tried everything I can think of. Is there any way at all that we can get post-review to accept a --p4-ticket argument and that can translate into -P ticket arguments on the P4 commands? -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: post-review and P4PASSWD
It's located under reviewboard/scmtools. The full path for mine is: / usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.5rc1-py2.5.egg/ reviewboard/scmtools. Obviously this is a Unix install. I'm not quite sure where it would be for windows. Does that help? On Aug 25, 11:50 am, RShelley 12gaugeme...@gmail.com wrote: Where would perforce.py be located? I've hunted around and can't find it. On Aug 25, 9:28 am, tag_98007work tag98007w...@gmail.com wrote: I was having P4PASSWD issues until I patched the perforce.py file with the changes fromhttp://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1537/diff/. After I patched the file I restarted the server (don't know if that's needed or not) On Aug 25, 8:56 am, RShelley 12gaugeme...@gmail.com wrote: I've been struggling recently getting post-review to pick up the P4PASSWD properly. We have post-review as part of a script and we first run p4 login -p to get a ticket and then put that ticket in the environment. Subsequent p4 describe -P ticket changelist commands work fine, but post-review gives the P4PASSWORD is invalid or unset error. I've tried everything I can think of. Is there any way at all that we can get post-review to accept a --p4-ticket argument and that can translate into -P ticket arguments on the P4 commands?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: post-review and P4PASSWD
hmm, at one point (I'm having issues and attmpting to re-install, whole 'nother story) my ReviewBoard-1.5rc1-py2.5.egg was a top level directory. Under that was the scmtools directory. So I'm not quite sure how to resolve that they egg isn't a directory. On Aug 25, 1:11 pm, RShelley 12gaugeme...@gmail.com wrote: I'm on Linux and I found the site-packages, but I don't have any directories under it, just the eggs. I also tried: find / -name perforce.py and that didn't come up with anything On Aug 25, 12:22 pm, tag_98007work tag98007w...@gmail.com wrote: It's located under reviewboard/scmtools. The full path for mine is: / usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.5rc1-py2.5.egg/ reviewboard/scmtools. Obviously this is a Unix install. I'm not quite sure where it would be for windows. Does that help? On Aug 25, 11:50 am, RShelley 12gaugeme...@gmail.com wrote: Where would perforce.py be located? I've hunted around and can't find it. On Aug 25, 9:28 am, tag_98007work tag98007w...@gmail.com wrote: I was having P4PASSWD issues until I patched the perforce.py file with the changes fromhttp://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1537/diff/. After I patched the file I restarted the server (don't know if that's needed or not) On Aug 25, 8:56 am, RShelley 12gaugeme...@gmail.com wrote: I've been struggling recently getting post-review to pick up the P4PASSWD properly. We have post-review as part of a script and we first run p4 login -p to get a ticket and then put that ticket in the environment. Subsequent p4 describe -P ticket changelist commands work fine, but post-review gives the P4PASSWORD is invalid or unset error. I've tried everything I can think of. Is there any way at all that we can get post-review to accept a --p4-ticket argument and that can translate into -P ticket arguments on the P4 commands?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
reviewboard.settings lost?
I've been running Reviewboard 1.5 RC1 for about a week. According to the logs sometime Sunday morning there was a restart, after that I'm getting the messages: Error log: [Sun Aug 22 08:03:41 2010] [notice] SIGUSR1 received. Doing graceful restart /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycrypto-2.2-py2.5-linux-i686.egg/ Crypto/Util/randpool.py:40: RandomPool_DeprecationWarning: This application uses RandomPool, which is BROKEN in older releases. See http://www.pycrypto.org/randpool-broken RandomPool_DeprecationWarning) /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycrypto-2.2-py2.5-linux-i686.egg/ Crypto/Util/randpool.py:40: RandomPool_DeprecationWarning: This application uses RandomPool, which is BROKEN in older releases. See http://www.pycrypto.org/randpool-broken RandomPool_DeprecationWarning) [Sun Aug 22 08:03:41 2010] [notice] mod_python: Creating 8 session mutexes based on 3 max processes and 25 max threads. [Sun Aug 22 08:03:41 2010] [notice] mod_python: using mutex_directory / tmp [Sun Aug 22 08:03:42 2010] [notice] Apache/2.2.9 (Debian) mod_python/ 3.3.1 Python/2.5.2 configured -- resuming normal operations [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] mod_python (pid=12535, interpreter='reviewboard_reviewboard', phase='PythonHandler', handler='django.core.handlers.modpython'): Application error, referer: http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] ServerName: 'reviewboard', referer: http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] DocumentRoot: '/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs', referer: http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] URI: '/ reviews/api/json/reviewrequests/17/last-update/', referer: http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] Location: '/ reviews/', referer: http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] Directory: None, referer: http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] Filename: '/ var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/reviews', referer: http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] PathInfo: '/ api/json/reviewrequests/17/last-update/', referer: http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] Traceback (most recent call last):, referer: http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] File / usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py, line 1537, in HandlerDispatch\ndefault=default_handler, arg=req, silent=hlist.silent), referer: http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] File / usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py, line 1229, in _process_target\nresult = _execute_target(config, req, object, arg), referer: http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] File / usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py, line 1128, in _execute_target\nresult = object(arg), referer: http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] File / usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.5.egg/django/core/ handlers/modpython.py, line 228, in handler\nreturn ModPythonHandler()(req), referer: http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] File / usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.5.egg/django/core/ handlers/modpython.py, line 191, in __call__\n self.load_middleware(), referer: http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] File / usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.5.egg/django/utils/ functional.py, line 276, in __getattr__\nself._setup(), referer: http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] File / usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.5.egg/django/conf/ __init__.py, line 40, in _setup\nself._wrapped = Settings(settings_module), referer: http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] File / usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.5.egg/django/conf/ __init__.py, line 75, in __init__\nraise ImportError(Could not import settings '%s' (Is it on sys.path? Does it have syntax errors?): %s % (self.SETTINGS_MODULE, e)), referer: http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ [Sun Aug 22 08:08:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.54.132] ImportError: Could not import settings 'reviewboard.settings' (Is it on sys.path? Does it have syntax errors?): No module named reviewboard.settings, referer: http://thall.wgti.net/reviews/r/17/ Where should reviewboard.settings live? Any insight would be great. Thanks -- Want to help the Review
Re: Files in Patch not the same as files in view diff
View diff shows:
Revision 1 New Change # this file is really /config/host_tools/
Config.mak not sysfiles/etc/passwd
1 # WG_CPU is toolchain prefix
2 WG_CPU = x86
3 WG_ARCH = x86
4 WG_ENDIAN = little
5
6 KERNEL_ARCH = i386
7 KERNEL_SFX = ko
8 KERNEL_VPATH = true
9
10 export WG_ARCH
11 export WG_CPU
12 export WG_ENDIAN
13 export KERNEL_ARCH
14 export KERNEL_SFX
15 export KERNEL_VPATH
//user/reviewboard/components/wg_linux/mainline/sysfiles/finley/etc/
fstab
Revision 1 New Change # this file is really /config/host_tools/
debug_platform.pkgspec and not sysfiles/finley/etc/fstab
1 return
2 Entry { dst = DRVPATH .. oprofile. .. ext,
3 src = $LINUX_BASE/modules/arch/$KERNEL_ARCH/
oprofile/oprofile. .. ext }
4
-
--- //user/reviewboard/components/wg_linux/mainline/sysfiles/etc/
passwd //user/reviewboard/components/wg_linux/mainline/sysfiles/etc/
passwd#1
+++ //user/reviewboard/components/wg_linux/mainline/sysfiles/etc/
passwd 2010-08-19 10:14:30
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+#add a line
+#
root:!$1$jw92fqyv$NVy9MLVQEPDvXiOXQC4jp.:0:0:Administrator:/root:/bin/
ash
bin:x:1:1:bin:/bin:
system:x:2:96:WG System daemons:/:
--- //user/reviewboard/components/wg_linux/mainline/sysfiles/finley/
etc/fstab //user/reviewboard/components/wg_linux/mainline/sysfiles/
finley/etc/fstab#1
+++ //user/reviewboard/components/wg_linux/mainline/sysfiles/finley/
etc/fstab 2010-08-19 10:14:30
@@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
+#new line
+#and another
+
/dev/wgrd.sysa_code/ ext2
ro 1 1
none /proc proc
defaults0 0
none /syssysfs
defaults0 0
--
Logging shows:
2010-08-20 08:43:41,623 - DEBUG - Generating diff viewer page for
filediff id 9
2010-08-20 08:43:41,641 - DEBUG - Begin: Generating diff file info for
diffset id 9
2010-08-20 08:43:41,644 - DEBUG - End: Generating diff file info for
diffset id 9
2010-08-20 08:43:41,644 - DEBUG - Generating diff file info for
diffset id 9 took 0.2773 seconds
2010-08-20 08:43:41,649 - DEBUG - Begin: Generating diff file info for
diffset id 9, filediff 14
2010-08-20 08:43:41,651 - DEBUG - End: Generating diff file info for
diffset id 9, filediff 14
2010-08-20 08:43:41,651 - DEBUG - Generating diff file info for
diffset id 9, filediff 14 took 0.2185 seconds
2010-08-20 08:43:42,013 - DEBUG - Done generating diff viewer page for
filediff id 9
2010-08-20 08:43:42,582 - DEBUG - Begin: Generating diff file info for
diffset id 9, filediff 15
2010-08-20 08:43:42,584 - DEBUG - End: Generating diff file info for
diffset id 9, filediff 15
2010-08-20 08:43:42,584 - DEBUG - Generating diff file info for
diffset id 9, filediff 15 took 0.1751 seconds
--
Any help in sorting this out would be appreciated. We are attempting
this against Perforce.
Thanks
On Aug 19, 5:04 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
I don't see any files attached.
Which files were shown in the diff viewer?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:35 PM, tag_98007work tag98007w...@gmail.comwrote:
I uploaded a changelist with 2 files in it: Code Review Checklist.txt,
place_holder
When I view the diff throught the View Diff button the files displayed
are not the files from the changelist. The diff in the download diff
is correct.
I uploaded the files: cl285668_viewdiff.txt so you can see what's
visiable on the view diff button.
cl285668bug.path is what's visable on the
download diff. This one is correct.
I'm running RB 1.5 RC1 on a Linux server
Mysql on Linux
RBTools 0.2 on Windows
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Files in Patch not the same as files in view diff
I restarted the memcache and that seems to have fixed the issues.
thanks
On Aug 20, 11:49 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Oh, so your diff is uploading passwd but you're seeing Config.mak.
It's possible that you have some odd caching problem. If you're using
memcached, try restarting it to clear the cache. If it's a file-based cache,
delete all the files in the cache. Then re-view the diff.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 8:51 AM, tag_98007work tag98007w...@gmail.comwrote:
View diff shows:
Revision 1 New Change # this file is really /config/host_tools/
Config.mak not sysfiles/etc/passwd
1 # WG_CPU is toolchain prefix
2 WG_CPU = x86
3 WG_ARCH = x86
4 WG_ENDIAN = little
5
6 KERNEL_ARCH = i386
7 KERNEL_SFX = ko
8 KERNEL_VPATH = true
9
10 export WG_ARCH
11 export WG_CPU
12 export WG_ENDIAN
13 export KERNEL_ARCH
14 export KERNEL_SFX
15 export KERNEL_VPATH
//user/reviewboard/components/wg_linux/mainline/sysfiles/finley/etc/
fstab
Revision 1 New Change # this file is really /config/host_tools/
debug_platform.pkgspec and not sysfiles/finley/etc/fstab
1 return
2 Entry { dst = DRVPATH .. oprofile. .. ext,
3 src = $LINUX_BASE/modules/arch/$KERNEL_ARCH/
oprofile/oprofile. .. ext }
4
-
--- //user/reviewboard/components/wg_linux/mainline/sysfiles/etc/
passwd //user/reviewboard/components/wg_linux/mainline/sysfiles/etc/
passwd#1
+++ //user/reviewboard/components/wg_linux/mainline/sysfiles/etc/
passwd 2010-08-19 10:14:30
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+#add a line
+#
root:!$1$jw92fqyv$NVy9MLVQEPDvXiOXQC4jp.:0:0:Administrator:/root:/bin/
ash
bin:x:1:1:bin:/bin:
system:x:2:96:WG System daemons:/:
--- //user/reviewboard/components/wg_linux/mainline/sysfiles/finley/
etc/fstab //user/reviewboard/components/wg_linux/mainline/sysfiles/
finley/etc/fstab#1
+++ //user/reviewboard/components/wg_linux/mainline/sysfiles/finley/
etc/fstab 2010-08-19 10:14:30
@@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
+#new line
+#and another
+
/dev/wgrd.sysa_code / ext2
ro 1 1
none /proc proc
defaults 0 0
none /sys sysfs
defaults 0 0
--
Logging shows:
2010-08-20 08:43:41,623 - DEBUG - Generating diff viewer page for
filediff id 9
2010-08-20 08:43:41,641 - DEBUG - Begin: Generating diff file info for
diffset id 9
2010-08-20 08:43:41,644 - DEBUG - End: Generating diff file info for
diffset id 9
2010-08-20 08:43:41,644 - DEBUG - Generating diff file info for
diffset id 9 took 0.2773 seconds
2010-08-20 08:43:41,649 - DEBUG - Begin: Generating diff file info for
diffset id 9, filediff 14
2010-08-20 08:43:41,651 - DEBUG - End: Generating diff file info for
diffset id 9, filediff 14
2010-08-20 08:43:41,651 - DEBUG - Generating diff file info for
diffset id 9, filediff 14 took 0.2185 seconds
2010-08-20 08:43:42,013 - DEBUG - Done generating diff viewer page for
filediff id 9
2010-08-20 08:43:42,582 - DEBUG - Begin: Generating diff file info for
diffset id 9, filediff 15
2010-08-20 08:43:42,584 - DEBUG - End: Generating diff file info for
diffset id 9, filediff 15
2010-08-20 08:43:42,584 - DEBUG - Generating diff file info for
diffset id 9, filediff 15 took 0.1751 seconds
--
Any help in sorting this out would be appreciated. We are attempting
this against Perforce.
Thanks
On Aug 19, 5:04 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
I don't see any files attached.
Which files were shown in the diff viewer?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:35 PM, tag_98007work tag98007w...@gmail.com
wrote:
I uploaded a changelist with 2 files in it: Code Review Checklist.txt,
place_holder
When I view the diff throught the View Diff button the files displayed
are not the files from the changelist. The diff in the download diff
is correct.
I uploaded the files: cl285668_viewdiff.txt so you can see what's
visiable on the view diff button.
cl285668bug.path is what's visable on the
download diff. This one is correct.
I'm running RB 1.5 RC1 on a Linux server
Mysql on Linux
RBTools 0.2 on Windows
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard
Re: attempting to install RBTools on linux
Actually RBTools was never added to the easy-tools.pth. Weird. I
could have sworn I got it at one point. Wound up downloading an
unzipping the egg.
I'm hoping the easy_tools -U RBTools works for the other people who
are checking Reviewboard out for our company.
On Aug 20, 3:24 am, JohnHenry qhlonl...@163.com wrote:
Hi,
I tried your command on my machine and it had no such problem.
Notice that easy_install -U is updating your RBTools(Not First Time
Install ), That means you should had a former version of RBTools
installed before. Check your easy_install.pth file and make sure your
former RBTools version and path was configed there. Hope to be of
help.
Best Regards!
On 8月19日, 上午4时38分, tag_98007work tag98007w...@gmail.com wrote:
easy_install -fhttp://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/Djblets/0.6/-U
Djblets
This worked just fine.
easy_install -fhttp://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/RBTools/0.2/
-U RBTools
gets me:
Searching for RBTools
Readinghttp://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/RBTools/0.2/
Readinghttp://pypi.python.org/simple/RBTools/
No local packages or download links found for RBTools
error: Could not find suitable distribution for
Requirement.parse('RBTools')
So where am I running amuck?
Thanks
On Aug 18, 12:28 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
If you don't, then that's fine. It's possible to put values in there that
could trigger the sort of problem you're hitting.
In that case, I don't really know what to say. It works fine elsewhere,
which indicates it's something odd in your computer or network's setup. I
assume this has continued to be a problem since your first post.
If this continues to fail, you can try:
easy_install -fhttp://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/Djblets/0.6/-U
Djblets
If *that* fails, your setuptools is definitely busted.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:38 AM, tag_98007work
tag98007w...@gmail.comwrote:
No I don't. Did i miss that in the documentation? What suppose to be
in the file?
thanks
On Aug 16, 1:30 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Hi,
That's strange. I just tried it and it's working fine. Do you have a
~/.pydistutils.cfg file set?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 1:12 PM, tag_98007work tag98007w...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm following the instructions: easy_install -U RBTools and I'm
getting the error message:
Searching for RBTools
Readinghttp://pypi.python.org/simple/RBTools/
No local packages or download links found for RBTools
error: Could not find suitable distribution for
Requirement.parse('RBTools')
Any ideas?
Debian version 5.0.3
Python 2.5
SetupTools - 0.6c8-4
ReviewBoard - 1.5 RC 1
Thanks
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegr---oups.com
reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegr-oups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en-Hidequotedtext -
- Show quoted text -
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegr---oups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en-Hidequoted text -
- Show quoted text -- 隐藏被引用文字 -
- 显示引用的文字 -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: attempting to install RBTools on linux
No I don't. Did i miss that in the documentation? What suppose to be
in the file?
thanks
On Aug 16, 1:30 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Hi,
That's strange. I just tried it and it's working fine. Do you have a
~/.pydistutils.cfg file set?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 1:12 PM, tag_98007work tag98007w...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm following the instructions: easy_install -U RBTools and I'm
getting the error message:
Searching for RBTools
Readinghttp://pypi.python.org/simple/RBTools/
No local packages or download links found for RBTools
error: Could not find suitable distribution for
Requirement.parse('RBTools')
Any ideas?
Debian version 5.0.3
Python 2.5
SetupTools - 0.6c8-4
ReviewBoard - 1.5 RC 1
Thanks
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: attempting to install RBTools on linux
easy_install -f http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/Djblets/0.6/-U
Djblets
This worked just fine.
easy_install -f http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/RBTools/0.2/
-U RBTools
gets me:
Searching for RBTools
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/RBTools/0.2/
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/RBTools/
No local packages or download links found for RBTools
error: Could not find suitable distribution for
Requirement.parse('RBTools')
So where am I running amuck?
Thanks
On Aug 18, 12:28 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
If you don't, then that's fine. It's possible to put values in there that
could trigger the sort of problem you're hitting.
In that case, I don't really know what to say. It works fine elsewhere,
which indicates it's something odd in your computer or network's setup. I
assume this has continued to be a problem since your first post.
If this continues to fail, you can try:
easy_install -f http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/Djblets/0.6/-U
Djblets
If *that* fails, your setuptools is definitely busted.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:38 AM, tag_98007work tag98007w...@gmail.comwrote:
No I don't. Did i miss that in the documentation? What suppose to be
in the file?
thanks
On Aug 16, 1:30 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Hi,
That's strange. I just tried it and it's working fine. Do you have a
~/.pydistutils.cfg file set?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 1:12 PM, tag_98007work tag98007w...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm following the instructions: easy_install -U RBTools and I'm
getting the error message:
Searching for RBTools
Readinghttp://pypi.python.org/simple/RBTools/
No local packages or download links found for RBTools
error: Could not find suitable distribution for
Requirement.parse('RBTools')
Any ideas?
Debian version 5.0.3
Python 2.5
SetupTools - 0.6c8-4
ReviewBoard - 1.5 RC 1
Thanks
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en-Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Files in Patch not the same as files in view diff
I uploaded a changelist with 2 files in it: Code Review Checklist.txt, place_holder When I view the diff throught the View Diff button the files displayed are not the files from the changelist. The diff in the download diff is correct. I uploaded the files: cl285668_viewdiff.txt so you can see what's visiable on the view diff button. cl285668bug.path is what's visable on the download diff. This one is correct. I'm running RB 1.5 RC1 on a Linux server Mysql on Linux RBTools 0.2 on Windows -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
attempting to install RBTools on linux
I'm following the instructions: easy_install -U RBTools and I'm
getting the error message:
Searching for RBTools
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/RBTools/
No local packages or download links found for RBTools
error: Could not find suitable distribution for
Requirement.parse('RBTools')
Any ideas?
Debian version 5.0.3
Python 2.5
SetupTools - 0.6c8-4
ReviewBoard - 1.5 RC 1
Thanks
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
