tps://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
-Original Message-
From: Dunnigan, Terrence J
Reply: reviewboard@googlegroups.com >
Date: May 7, 2015 at 2:15:26 PM
To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com >,
kswee...@twitter.com >
Subject: RE: can't pip install RB
07, 2015 4:06 PM
To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com; kswee...@twitter.com
Subject: Re: can't pip install RBTools - no packages on pypi?
Hi Kevin,
The next releases of RBTools and Review Board will ship Wheels, which are
pip-compatible. We have everything in place for this already.
We&#x
swee...@twitter.com >
Date: May 7, 2015 at 1:54:11 PM
To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com >
Cc: chip...@chipx86.com >
Subject: Re: can't pip install RBTools - no packages on pypi?
> Hi Christian,
>
> Has there been any progress on these plans? Is there an issue I can watch?
Hi Christian,
Has there been any progress on these plans? Is there an issue I can watch?
Thanks,
Kevin
On Wednesday, October 22, 2014 at 6:02:03 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> There's been some ongoing discussions about changes to pip and the
> strategy for verification/ex
Hi Kevin,
There's been some ongoing discussions about changes to pip and the strategy
for verification/external packages. We're waiting to see how those impact
us. In the meantime, we've made some of the changes needed to get us closer
to not needing allow-unverified, but we're not fully there yet
Apologies if this is already answered somewhere in history, but are there
any plans to revisit this change?
We (Apache Aurora) use rbt in our development workflow via pip to no
apparent ill effect. We'd like to avoid the use of --allow-unverified
RBTools
The currently-published version is only
For the record, the below command does result in a correctly-working rbt
command.
rbtools really should become compatible with the pip default options.
On Wednesday, August 6, 2014 2:17:37 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
> That will install the package, but I believe pip still doesn't prop
That will install the package, but I believe pip still doesn't properly
register python entry points, which means that rbt won't work right.
-David
> On Aug 6, 2014, at 2:04 PM, Edward Delaporte wrote:
>
> For what it's worth, there seems to be a combination of command line flags
> that works
For what it's worth, there seems to be a combination of command line flags
that works as a workaround:
pip install rbtools --allow-external rbtools --allow-unverified rbtools
On Wednesday, May 7, 2014 8:03:11 AM UTC-5, Jason Antman wrote:
>
> I'm aware that pip is not a supported installation m
Hi Jason,
For I suppose security reasons, the pip team decided to no longer support
installing packages that aren't hosted directly on PyPI. Since we actually
host the packages ourselves (for a variety of reasons), pip will just
ignore them.
There's a command line option in pip to turn this off,
I'm aware that pip is not a supported installation method for ReviewBoard
itself. However, I have a number of cases where pip installation is the
only method I can do, and I only need access to RBTools for the API client.
As of a few months ago, I was able to `pip install RBTools==0.5.2` without
11 matches
Mail list logo
