Issue 2279 in reviewboard: 1.6.1 started to return redirected url instead of configured server name

2011-09-12 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2279 by kofem...@googlemail.com: 1.6.1 started to return redirected url instead of configured server name http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2279 * NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug

Issue 2280 in reviewboard: API: failure to update review request: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'startswith'

2011-09-12 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2280 by robert.munteanu: API: failure to update review request: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'startswith' http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2280 What version are you running?

Re: Issue 2280 in reviewboard: API: failure to update review request: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'startswith'

2011-09-12 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Support Comment #1 on issue 2280 by chip...@gmail.com: API: failure to update review request: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'startswith' http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2280 Are

Re: Issue 2279 in reviewboard: 1.6.1 started to return redirected url instead of configured server name

2011-09-12 Thread reviewboard
Comment #3 on issue 2279 by chip...@gmail.com: 1.6.1 started to return redirected url instead of configured server name http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2279 Looks like this was part of the set of fixes in Django 1.3.1 for the security vulnerabilities. See the info at:

Re: Issue 2279 in reviewboard: 1.6.1 started to return redirected url instead of configured server name

2011-09-12 Thread reviewboard
Comment #4 on issue 2279 by kofem...@googlemail.com: 1.6.1 started to return redirected url instead of configured server name http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2279 Thanks. As we reverted back to 1.6 I will do a second attempt to upgrade tomorrow. -- You received this

Re: Comment on IdeasFor2_0 in reviewboard

2011-09-12 Thread reviewboard
Comment by jonathan...@gmail.com: In the pre-commit use case, I'd like to be able to use ReviewBoard to commit the change to SVN for me. That closes the loop of: Whoops, the developer accidentally committed something that they shouldn't have i.e. what was reviewed is actually what is

Re: Issue 2280 in reviewboard: API: failure to update review request: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'startswith'

2011-09-12 Thread reviewboard
Comment #2 on issue 2280 by robert.munteanu: API: failure to update review request: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'startswith' http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2280 I am posting using the ereviewboard plugin for Eclipse. After setting the

Re: Issue 2280 in reviewboard: API: failure to update review request: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'startswith'

2011-09-12 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: NotABug Comment #3 on issue 2280 by chip...@gmail.com: API: failure to update review request: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'startswith' http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2280 (No comment was entered for this change.) --

Issue 2281 in reviewboard: /api/info requested before login

2011-09-12 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2281 by mwhite...@wordstream.com: /api/info requested before login http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2281 * NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. * * If you need immediate

Issue 2282 in reviewboard: Open an issue checkboxes missing on Review Dialog page

2011-09-12 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 2282 by pankrato...@gmail.com: Open an issue checkboxes missing on Review Dialog page http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2282 *NOTE: If you have a patch, please submit it to