Issue 2867 in reviewboard: allow reporter to resolve issues

2013-01-16 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 2867 by matthew@kitware.com: allow reporter to resolve issues http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2867 What version are you running? RB 1.7.1 What's the URL of the page this enhancement relates to,

Issue 2868 in reviewboard: allow closing issues when updating request

2013-01-16 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 2868 by matthew@kitware.com: allow closing issues when updating request http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2868 What version are you running? RB 1.7.1 What's the URL of the page this enhancement

Re: Issue 2860 in reviewboard: GCC_4.2.0 version not found

2013-01-16 Thread reviewboard
Comment #3 on issue 2860 by chip...@gmail.com: GCC_4.2.0 version not found http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2860 If it's not showing up in the reviewboard.log, then we don't have any additional logging that would help here. It can occur at many points, though. The one yo

Re: Issue 2713 in reviewboard: Reviewer, not author, should mark issues as resolved/reopened

2013-01-16 Thread reviewboard
Comment #5 on issue 2713 by trowb...@gmail.com: Reviewer, not author, should mark issues as resolved/reopened http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2713 Issue 2867 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "

Re: Issue 2867 in reviewboard: allow reporter to resolve issues

2013-01-16 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 2713 Comment #1 on issue 2867 by trowb...@gmail.com: allow reporter to resolve issues http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2867 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subsc

Re: Issue 2713 in reviewboard: Reviewer, not author, should mark issues as resolved/reopened

2013-01-16 Thread reviewboard
Comment #6 on issue 2713 by matthew@kitware.com: Reviewer, not author, should mark issues as resolved/reopened http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2713 A three-stage flow would work. It's a little inconvenient (and also odd) for the author to not be able to indicate th