Re: Poll: Now that IE8 is arriving...

2009-04-21 Thread ciaomary
This is the same for our company - IE6 is still the official browser. I believe the majority of developers are using Firefox or alternate for using ReviewBoard however. On Apr 16, 10:25 am, Gilles Moris gilles.mo...@free.fr wrote: On Tue April 14 2009 23:39:09 Christian Hammond wrote: 1)

Using rss feeds instead of emails

2009-04-21 Thread Vesterbaek
Hi, I've looked a bit on the existing feeds, and they seem to list only all (feeds/rss/r/all), pending for a user (/feeds/rss/users/username) or pending for a group (feeds/rss/groups/groupname). Would it be possible to use rss feeds to inform about updates that would normally go out via email

Issue 1069 in reviewboard: semicolon appended to url

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #2 on issue 1069 by chipx86: semicolon appended to url http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1069 Which version? -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this

Issue 1008 in reviewboard: Tracker bug: Add a concept of policy

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 1008: Tracker bug: Add a concept of policy http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1008 This issue is now blocking issue 606. See http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=606 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this

Issue 606 in reviewboard: Roles and enablement

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Blockedon: 1008 Comment #2 on issue 606 by chipx86: Roles and enablement http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=606 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because

Issue 1025 in reviewboard: Show last editor in the review list

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement Comment #2 on issue 1025 by chipx86: Show last editor in the review list http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1025 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner

Issue 1009 in reviewboard: Permission denied to get property XULElement.tagName

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Labels: Milestone-Release1.0 Component-DiffViewer Comment #1 on issue 1009 by chipx86: Permission denied to get property XULElement.tagName http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1009 Which browser is this? I'm not seeing this problem.

Issue 1007 in reviewboard: post-review.py dies on really huge diffs.

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Labels: Component-RBTools Scalability Comment #1 on issue 1007 by chipx86: post-review.py dies on really huge diffs. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1007 What does it say when you run with -d? -- You received this message

Issue 1006 in reviewboard: BUG: Comment marker shows up on wrong line in FF

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: UnableToReproduce Comment #5 on issue 1006 by chipx86: BUG: Comment marker shows up on wrong line in FF http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1006 This may be related to another bug that was fixed, but nobody else has reported this and since you

Issue 1000 in reviewboard: post-review documentation shows wrong svn property (reviewboard.url instead of reviewboard:url)

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 1000 by chipx86: post-review documentation shows wrong svn property (reviewboard.url instead of reviewboard:url) http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1000 Fixed in r1921. -- You received this message because you are listed

Issue 1011 in reviewboard: Interdiff doesn't handle mid-review reverted files correctly

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Confirmed Labels: Milestone-Release1.5 Interdiffs Component-DiffViewer Comment #2 on issue 1011 by chipx86: Interdiff doesn't handle mid-review reverted files correctly http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1011 Going to push this back to the

Issue 1029 in reviewboard: lines

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 1028 Comment #3 on issue 1029 by chipx86: lines http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1029 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this

Issue 993 in reviewboard: in rbtools, add simplejson as a dependency

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: NotABug Comment #5 on issue 993 by chipx86: in rbtools, add simplejson as a dependency http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=993 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of

Issue 1036 in reviewboard: Interdiff of files removed from a change cause weird things

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Confirmed Labels: Milestone-Release1.0 Interdiffs Component-DiffViewer Comment #1 on issue 1036 by chipx86: Interdiff of files removed from a change cause weird things http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1036 (No comment was entered for this

Issue 1036 in reviewboard: Interdiff of files removed from a change cause weird things

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #3 on issue 1036 by chipx86: Interdiff of files removed from a change cause weird things http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1036 I just couldn't sleep until I fixed this. The weirdness should now be fixed in r1036. It was due to cache

Issue 1036 in reviewboard: Interdiff of files removed from a change cause weird things

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #4 on issue 1036 by chipx86: Interdiff of files removed from a change cause weird things http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1036 Er, r1923. Bed time. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred

Issue 1011 in reviewboard: Interdiff doesn't handle mid-review reverted files correctly

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #4 on issue 1011 by chipx86: Interdiff doesn't handle mid-review reverted files correctly http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1011 So we do show that it's been reverted as part of the revision. The problem was that we were hitting a

Issue 1055 in reviewboard: Interdiff of deleted files broken.

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Confirmed Owner: chipx86 Labels: Interdiffs Milestone-Release1.0 Component-DiffViewer Comment #1 on issue 1055 by chipx86: Interdiff of deleted files broken. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1055 (No comment was entered for this

Issue 1011 in reviewboard: Interdiff doesn't handle mid-review reverted files correctly

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Owner: chipx86 Labels: -Milestone-Release1.5 Milestone-Release1.0 Comment #3 on issue 1011 by chipx86: Interdiff doesn't handle mid-review reverted files correctly http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1011 Maybe we can do this for 1.0 afterall.. --

Issue 1071 in reviewboard: Review Board does not handle files with ^M characters at end of line.

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1071 by raghu.kb: Review Board does not handle files with ^M characters at end of line. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1071 Review Board does not handle files with ^M characters at end of line. What

Issue 1069 in reviewboard: semicolon appended to url

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #3 on issue 1069 by cordahi: semicolon appended to url http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1069 Current version. It shows 1.0beta3, was installed April 14. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you

Issue 1009 in reviewboard: Permission denied to get property XULElement.tagName

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #2 on issue 1009 by ivazqueznet: Permission denied to get property XULElement.tagName http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1009 It was Firefox 3, but it seems to not be happening any more; may have been a transient glitch. Please close. -- You received this message

Issue 1073 in reviewboard: Reloading failed diff uploads

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1073 by pratap.singh: Reloading failed diff uploads http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1073 When the browser is loading the diffs from the RB server, it can sometime fail to do so especially if the RB

Issue 1073 in reviewboard: Reloading failed diff uploads

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Confirmed Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement Milestone-Release1.5 Component-DiffViewer Comment #1 on issue 1073 by chipx86: Reloading failed diff uploads http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1073 Sounds reasonable. -- You received this

Issue 1072 in reviewboard: SVN --config-dir support

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement Comment #2 on issue 1072 by chipx86: SVN --config-dir support http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1072 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC

Issue 1068 in reviewboard: Use a Mail Transfer Agent (MTA) to send mail instead of a mail server listening at a TCP/IP port

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Confirmed Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement Milestone-Release1.5 Component-EMail Comment #2 on issue 1068 by chipx86: Use a Mail Transfer Agent (MTA) to send mail instead of a mail server listening at a TCP/IP port

Issue 1053 in reviewboard: 404 when adding comments to new unpublished review request

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Confirmed Labels: Component-DiffViewer Milestone-Release1.5 Comment #1 on issue 1053 by chipx86: 404 when adding comments to new unpublished review request http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1053 We just shouldn't allow commenting. -- You

Issue 938 in reviewboard: Hyperlinks to code locations in the reviews do not function. Take you to the top of the review, not the appropriate anchor

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #1 on issue 938 by chipx86: Hyperlinks to code locations in the reviews do not function. Take you to the top of the review, not the appropriate anchor http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=938 What version was this? Can you try a

Issue 778 in reviewboard: Need a way to do a password reset

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Confirmed Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement Milestone-Release1.5 Component-Accounts Comment #2 on issue 778 by chipx86: Need a way to do a password reset http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=778 (No comment was entered for this change.)

Issue 313 in reviewboard: Suggestion: remove mouseclick requirement for field editing.

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement Comment #6 on issue 313 by chipx86: Suggestion: remove mouseclick requirement for field editing. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=313 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you

Issue 735 in reviewboard: NIS backend doesn't support MD5 passwords

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: Milestone-Release1.0 Comment #3 on issue 735 by chipx86: NIS backend doesn't support MD5 passwords http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=735 Pretty sure we committed this. -- You received this message because you are listed in

Issue 1053 in reviewboard: 404 when adding comments to new unpublished review request

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 831 Comment #2 on issue 1053 by chipx86: 404 when adding comments to new unpublished review request http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1053 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because

Issue 831 in reviewboard: Can't leave comments before you publish your own newly created review request

2009-04-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #1 on issue 831 by chipx86: Can't leave comments before you publish your own newly created review request http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=831 Issue 1053 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC