Re: HOW to avoiding publishing a review request if no user present in people/group

2012-06-16 Thread Nilesh Jaiswal
I am talking about UI only. I am still able to publish without assigning people/groups. I used post-review -c changelist This gave me UI link also opened web UI with people/group field empty, when i pressed publish it proceeded with informing user. How to avoid it, is there any Admin setting

Re: post review for a specific mercurial changeset

2012-06-16 Thread Gilles Moris
On Friday 15 June 2012 10:50:07 pm TP wrote: Hi, We're using hg postreview extension with RB. How do we submit a review for a specific changeset if we've multiple outgoing changesets? For example, if we have local changesets 1, 2, 3 and I want to submit a review for 2. Running hg postreview 2

Re: HOW to avoiding publishing a review request if no user present in people/group

2012-06-16 Thread Christian Hammond
Review Board doesn't allow publishing if there's no user or group, and never has. This sounds like a local modification, if it's allowing it. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Sat, Jun 16,

A repository was not found at the specified path CVS Reviewboard 1.6.9 MOD-WSGI

2012-06-16 Thread Augba
Hi, I could successfully install Reviewboard on Ubuntu . I am new to linux,python wsgi etc. even then by following the user guide I could unstall Reviewbord. But while adding the cvs repository getting the 'A repository was not found at the specified path.' The url is given as

Re: Can't seem to connect to pserver CVS repository

2012-06-16 Thread Augba
I too facing the same issue. Please let me know if you have the steps working. On Friday, April 13, 2012 8:45:12 PM UTC+5:30, sagar wrote: Using ReviewBoard version 1.6.5 I've tried the following: *:pserver:user:pass@repo-url:/path/to/repo* ** *:pserver:user@repo-url:/path/to/repo*

Re: Upgraded OS , then ReviewBoard failed upgrade

2012-06-16 Thread Dan Dumont
Didn't touch the apache config. It's a http - https redirect (no idea why the browser isn't simply following it, do ajax requests eat the 301 errors? I can't remember). This is a brand new draft. On Saturday, June 16, 2012 9:31:26 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Dan, It looks like

Re: Upgraded OS , then ReviewBoard failed upgrade

2012-06-16 Thread Dan Dumont
Ahh ok. So a bit more info: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/228225/prevent-redirection-of-xmlhttprequest If the origin of the URL conveyed by the Location header is same origin with the XMLHttpRequest origin and the redirect does not violate infinite loop precautions, transparently

Re: Upgraded OS , then ReviewBoard failed upgrade

2012-06-16 Thread Dan Dumont
Request URL: https://reviews.apache.org/api/review-requests/5345/?api_format=json responds: 1. review_request: {status:pending, last_updated:2012-06-17 02:58:20, description:,…} 1. branch: 2. bugs_closed: [] 3. changenum: null 4. description: 5. id: 5345

Re: Upgraded OS , then ReviewBoard failed upgrade

2012-06-16 Thread Dan Dumont
I found https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/reviewboard/yIOamU1uvIY But I tried setting os.environ['HTTPS'] = on In the reviewboard.wsgi file, but no dice. I'm pretty sure we have a reverse proxy of some sort in front of us terminating SSL at the the border. Would be nice

Issue 2639 in reviewboard: Appending 'undefined' to options.path

2012-06-16 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2639 by ddumont: Appending 'undefined' to options.path http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2639 * NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. * * If you need immediate support,

Re: Issue 2639 in reviewboard: Appending 'undefined' to options.path

2012-06-16 Thread reviewboard
Comment #1 on issue 2639 by ddumont: Appending 'undefined' to options.path http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2639 I see there's a similar function where that was already applied. Sorry for no files or line numbers, I'm doing this in the debugger. -- You received this

Re: Issue 2639 in reviewboard: Appending 'undefined' to options.path

2012-06-16 Thread reviewboard
Comment #2 on issue 2639 by ddumont: Appending 'undefined' to options.path http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2639 datastore.js:655 (in my browser, anyway) datastore.js:840 has this technique already employed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the