Hello Christian,
I installed reviewboard unsing easy_install ReviewBoard
The Django version under /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/
is Django-1.4.10-py2.7.egg, package python-django is not installed
Marcello
Am Freitag, 21. Februar 2014 21:20:35 UTC+1 schrieb Christian Hammond:
What
Another thing: I uninstalled PIL and installed pillow but then rb-site
still seems to require PIL when running 'upgrade'.
--
Bruce
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:05 PM, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.comwrote:
Bruce,
You're right. We'll make sure that the combined release notes for the 2.0
Is this 2.0 beta 3?
Can you also show me what version of Djblets you have?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Bruce Cran bruce.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, it's 2.0 beta 3 - which is now running on Ubuntu 13.10.
I have both Djblets 0.7.15 and 0.8beta2 installed - it seems installing
ReviewBoard 2.0 beta 3 installed the newer version.
--
Bruce
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote:
Is this 2.0 beta 3?
Do you have the full install log for when you installed the package and it
tried to install PIL?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Bruce Cran
Actually I think I know what I did wrong: I upgraded Review Board _before_
uninstalling PIL and installing pillow. I guess there's some dependency
recorded that needs updated.
--
Bruce
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote:
Do you have the full install
That's probably the case.
You should be able to uninstall PIL and the pillowfight package, and then
re-install pillowfight. That'll install Pillow, if PIL is correctly removed.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. -
For people not familiar with the memory requirements of dedupe, I wonder if
it might be a good idea to add a warning that running rb-site manage
site condensediffs can need _lots_ of memory?
I ran it on our test server (running 2.0 beta 3) which had 8GB RAM and 8GB
swap allocated and with almost
Hi Bruce,
Sounds like we need to do some work there, because it shouldn't be using
that amount of memory. Might need to poke the garbage collector...
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
On
There appears to be a regression between 1.7.9 and 2.0 beta 3. I loaded a
test machine with a snapshot of data from 1.7.9 and upgraded. Most reviews
load fine, but on one that works on 1.7.9, with beta3 I get the exception:
UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xef in position 176:
Bruce,
Can you file a bug about this, including the traceback?
Thanks!
-David
On Feb 22, 2014, at 7:32 PM, Bruce Cran bruce.c...@gmail.com wrote:
There appears to be a regression between 1.7.9 and 2.0 beta 3. I loaded a
test machine with a snapshot of data from 1.7.9 and upgraded. Most
Created http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3261
Thanks.
Bruce
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 8:48 PM, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.comwrote:
Bruce,
Can you file a bug about this, including the traceback?
Thanks!
-David
On Feb 22, 2014, at 7:32 PM, Bruce Cran
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3261 by bruce.c...@gmail.com: 2.0 beta 3 regression: ordinal not
in range(128) when loading review with unicode characters
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3261
A review that loads on 1.7.9 in
13 matches
Mail list logo
