Re: Unable to view SVN diff after migration from 1.7.x to 2.0.1

I've had a similar issue intermittently. Adding windows-1252 to the list of encodings mentioned by David fixed the issue On 3/06/2014 5:42 AM, "Roudaille77" wrote: > Hello, > > I have just updated my ReviewBoard site but I can't visualize the > Subversion diff anymore... > I can see : > > There w

Re: Unable to view SVN diff after migration from 1.7.x to 2.0.1

This field is blank ! Le lundi 2 juin 2014 21:36:32 UTC+2, David Trowbridge a écrit : > > Can you tell us what's in the "Encoding" field (under "Advanced Settings") > in the repository admin? > > -David > > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Roudaille77 > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I have just upda

Re: Unable to view SVN diff after migration from 1.7.x to 2.0.1

Can you check to make sure that there's not a space in there? -David On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Roudaille77 wrote: > This field is blank ! > > Le lundi 2 juin 2014 21:36:32 UTC+2, David Trowbridge a écrit : >> >> Can you tell us what's in the "Encoding" field (under "Advanced >> Settings

Re: Unable to view SVN diff after migration from 1.7.x to 2.0.1

No space. I tried to put windows-1252 as Christian mentioned, it solves the problem ! Note that the diff files are generated by eclipse on Windows machines. My SVN server is on a linux one. I still have a similar problem : when I try to create a request from a commited change, i get an 500 error

Bulk Upload of Users

Hello, I have around 30 users who want to have an account created. Currently I see that I can do that via UI. Wanted to know if there is any bulk user creation option from CSV file or something on those lines. Best regards, Joe. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.

Re: Fedora rawhide: RB Dashboard missing "Edit Columns" button and column styling

Thanks Stephen and Christian, I've downloaded the rawhide updates from Koji and confirmed they've fixed this issue. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at

Re: Review Board 2.0.1 is released

On 29 May 2014 19:24, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 05/29/2014 07:19 AM, Cian Mc Govern wrote: > > On 28 May 2014 21:07, Stephen Gallagher > > wrote: > > > > On 05/26/2014 09:31 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > Review B

Re: Review Board 2.x and "hg postreview"

I and my team are still using "hg postreview" daily, including after upgrading to RB 2.0.1, and I'm still maintaining it as and when I have time (although I admit I've fallen behind on some of the requests in the issues list). I haven't worked much with RBTools; I'm sure it works fine but what

GitHub/ReviewBoard workflow

Hello, I'd like to know what the workflows are like for people who use ReviewBoard with GitHub/git. The team is used to GH pull requests and I worry that if we let them push directly to the repository, the code that shows up in the repo vs the review might be different. I understand there's cu

ReviewBoard 2.0.1 and Subversion - API Error 207

I'm trying to setup ReviewBoard 2.0.1 for the first time. Mostly it seems okay - I can get into the administration screen and add users/repos/etc - but I'm failing at the last hurdle. I can't get it to integrate properly with our Subversion server. In the "Change Repository" screen, I've picked

Re: Bulk Upload of Users

Hi Joe, There's no bulk-create option. What most companies do, I believe, is just require that the users sign themselves up on the Review Board server, or they make use of an existing LDAP/Active Directory server that already contains the user accounts. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@

Re: ReviewBoard 2.0.1 and Subversion - API Error 207

Hi Dan, Are you using PySVN on the server, or Subvertpy? Internally, we're running the equivalent of: $ svn cat @7134 It should be possible to run that and get the output. 99 times out of 100, when this happens, it's due to the resulting path being invalid. You can sanity-check the path by

Re: GitHub/ReviewBoard workflow

Hi Daryl, Which result 404s? I'd like to get that fixed. You'll probably have a lot of answers to your question. I'll tell you what I do, and what I've seen many others do. Instead of the model of pushing to a branch and submitting a pull request, users instead commit locally and post to Review

Re: Downgrading Reviewboard 2.0RC2 -> 1.7.25

Hi Daniel, I'm so sorry, I never got back to you on this. I was out of town for a few weeks in the middle of this discussion and it dropped off my radar. Ever get this figured out? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - ht

Re: CRITICAL: tuple index out of range error with RBTools 0.6 and Mercurial

The issue here is that rbt can't figure out which branch is your upstream (that is, which one is also available on the repository configured in review board). You can use --tracking-branch to specify this manually. We'll get a fix for the terrible error message in for 0.6.1 -David On Sun, May 2

Power Pack Reports for Review Board beta sign-up

Hey everyone, We’ll soon be releasing a new beta of Power Pack containing one of our most frequently-requested features: Reporting. Many people on this list have shown interest over the years in gathering useful statistics on how effectively their teams hav