Re: Upgrade from 2.0.18 to 2.5.3 cannot apply all evolutions

Hi Martin, Did you make a backup of your database first before the upgrade? The particular field it's trying to add should have already been part of your 2.0 install. It wasn't introduced in 2.5. Actually, there are a number of them missing. How long were you on 2.0.x? Did you ever run anything

Re: Bitbucket server repository + raw file url mask

On Tuesday 02 February 2016 16:30:10 Heinz Wiesinger wrote: > Hi! > > We're currently evaluating bitbucket server (formerly stash, not to be > confused with the bitbucket cloud hosting) and are having troubles coming up > with a usable raw file URL mask. What we found so far is this: > > http://w

Re: abort: The file was not found in the repository. (207)

Can someone please able to help me to proceed further. its blocking. On Wednesday, 24 February 2016 17:46:28 UTC+5:30, Divakar K wrote: > > Attached mercurial repository configuration in reviewboard. > > On Wednesday, 24 February 2016 17:03:54 UTC+5:30, Divakar K wrote: >> >> Hi Christian, >> >> P

Re: diffviewer_diffset.name isn't in GROUP BY

Django is 1.6.11 and MySQL-python was 1.2.3, but I upgraded to 1.2.5 and removed 1.2.3. I'm still getting the same error though. Is there a requirement for the python version? Thanks Jason On Wednesday, February 17, 2016 at 2:49:02 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hi Jason, > > I lo

Re: diffviewer_diffset.name isn't in GROUP BY

Hi Jason, Python version shouldn't make a difference here (though we require 1.6/1.7), and those versions look good now. I checked again, and I may have been looking at the wrong query before. Looking at our production instance of 2.5.x, we have the exact same query you have, and aren't hitting t

Re: diffviewer_diffset.name isn't in GROUP BY

Sorry, that was meant to be Python 2.6/2.7, not 1.6/1.7. Christian -- Christian Hammond President/CEO of Beanbag Makers of Review Board On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: > Hi Jason, > > Python version shouldn

Re: Bitbucket server repository + raw file url mask

Hi Heinz, The proper solution would be to implement a hosting service backend for this, or augment the existing one if the API is at all compatible. It should be possible to extend the raw file URL stuff to take in a commit ID, optionally, but it's a lot more work, as it impacts the SCMTool API.