On Tuesday 02 February 2016 16:30:10 Heinz Wiesinger wrote:
> We're currently evaluating bitbucket server (formerly stash, not to be
> confused with the bitbucket cloud hosting) and are having troubles coming up
> with a usable raw file URL mask. What we found so far is this:
> This works (with basic http authentication), but doesn't find the file
> because it expects <revision> to be a commit hash, not an object hash. As
> far as I can see at the moment Bitbucket server doesn't seem to have a way
> to retrieve files by object hash.
> Does anyone else have experience with Bitbucket server / Stash? Or is there
> a way to tell reviewboard to use commit hashes instead of object hashes?
I came back to this after a while to try again, but no dice. Even looked at
the code to see how easy it would be to add support for base_commit_id to
custom hosting repositories, but something seems to escape me.
I filed a feature request for now
(https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4195/). Like I mentioned there as
well, I'm more than happy to supply a patch for this myself, if someone can
help me figure out what needs to be adapted :)
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.