AD Authentication Supported?

2009-04-02 Thread Tom Sakkos
It's not exactly clear from the documentation (and other posts made on the mailing list). Is AD Authentication (officially) supported by Review-Board? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" gro

Re: Review Bord and Perforce integration problem

2009-05-05 Thread Tom Sakkos
This is an issue we've run into as well. While I may be incorrect in my assumption here, since I haven't gotten around to digging deeper, ReviewBoard compares the server connection's FQDN to the domain name you specified in the administration settings. Two issues: 1) If you try to provide an ali

Re: Reviewboard 1.0 Rc1 Xp installation View Diff not working!

2009-05-05 Thread Tom Sakkos
Is this a fresh install? IIRC, I ran into this issue because I didn't have MinGW (sp?) tools installed. ReviewBoard has a dependency on the GNU utils patch and diff. -Tom On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Noam Bunder wrote: > Install it on Ubuntu - you will be up and running in minutes. > - Jus

Re: Perforce server security level error when post a review

2009-06-29 Thread Tom Sakkos
I wouldn't know where to put this in ReviewBoard, but it's probably necessary to run "run_login()" on the p4 object immediately after running "connect()." -Tom On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Jason Lee wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I met another problem when post a perforce review. > > I install th

Re: Discussion about policy support.

2009-08-11 Thread Tom Sakkos
I'm not exactly familiar with it, but from a quick Google search, I found a ANTLR python runtime library... http://www.antlr.org/download/Python -Tom On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Eduardo Felipe wrote: > Hi there! > > I'm Eduardo and I'm working on Reviewboard for Google Summer of Code. > M

Re: Error 206: Repository path not specified

2009-08-28 Thread Tom Sakkos
On Aug 27, 2009, at 5:05 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: > Make sure for Perforce that the Path is an exact match for the > server name specified in: > > p4 info > > If they differ at all, it will not work. > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > Review Board - http

Re: Failed to execute command: ['svn', 'diff', '--diff-cmd=diff']

2009-09-03 Thread Tom Sakkos
Pubudu: http://review-board.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/management/repositories/ You need to add your subversion repository to review-board. -Tom On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Pubudu Rathnayake wrote: > Hello Christian, > > After installing GNU Diff ,i did post-review and it failed again. > >

Re: post-review login issue

2009-09-22 Thread Tom Sakkos
http://www.mail-archive.com/reviewboard@googlegroups.com/msg02548.htmldescribes the solution the P4PASSWORD issue. I'm not sure if it got much further than that... -Tom On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Hui Lin wrote: > > I am confused here. What does the diff uploading performed by the post-

Re: "Expand" broken since 1.0.3?

2009-09-25 Thread Tom Sakkos
Correct. The "Expand" links that expand individual files is not working correctly. "Expand All" seems to work however... -Tom On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Thilo-Alexander Ginkel wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 17:31, Thilo-Alexander Ginkel wrote: > >> can somebody confirm my observation

Re: "Expand" broken since 1.0.3?

2009-09-28 Thread Tom Sakkos
Yup. What you described seems to be the case. I make sure that everyone takes a look at the diff prior to submitting (there's an issue with diff/patch when there isn't an ending newline that prevents it from showing) just to make sure it works correctly. -Tom On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 10:30 AM,

Re: Installing PyLucene on Windows

2009-10-14 Thread Tom Sakkos
Apache Solr - http://lucene.apache.org/solr/ & http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolPython PySolr - http://code.google.com/p/pysolr/ Whether they will be less of a pain to install, I simply don't know. -Tom On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: > No, but good luck with it :) >

Re: Binary Files handling in RB 1.0.5

2009-12-01 Thread Tom Sakkos
Assuming that the files are marked as Binary files in Perforce, Review-Board should ignore them and properly say something along the lines of "Binary files differ." -Tom On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Kunjal wrote: > Hello, > > In our development environment, we have lot of reviews only with