All Perforce access is done through a single user, not through each
individual review request submitter. You should only need to point the
repository to one of location X or Y, depending on the credentials
configured in the repository admin.
-David
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 3:37 AM, satish singh
Hi David,
What you think it will work right ?, Can you let me know how to get the
update query running behind the GUI update.
-Satish
On Friday, 11 July 2014 15:22:07 UTC+5:30, satish singh wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> The issue is clients are migrated to multiple server across different
> locatio
Hi David,
The issue is clients are migrated to multiple server across different
location, some are migrated to X location some to Y location.
In GUI->ADMIN Login->Databases->review_requests, there is a option to
update the repository for review request which updates the repository ID.
So, I gue
I'd suggest just changing the existing Repository object to point to the
new server without changing any IDs.
-David
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 2:23 AM, satish singh wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> File path will be the same. So, updating the repository in Review board
> will be work fine,
> but there are
Hi David,
File path will be the same. So, updating the repository in Review board
will be work fine,
but there are two tables having the repository id: "reviews_reviewrequest"
, "diffviewer_diffset"
Do I need to update both the tables or just "reviews_reviewrequest" ?
Thanks,
Satish
On Fri
Are you slicing the depot into multiple pieces based on file paths or just
migrating it to another server?
If the file paths are staying the same, you can just update the repository
in Review Board to point to the new server.
-David
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:35 AM, satish singh wrote:
> Hi T
Hi Team,
Need to discuss on a solution for issue arising due to migration of
perforce server:
For perforce distributed environment upgrade, we are migrating perforce
clients to a different server, now the issue is with
existing review request, after the upgrade user can open existing review
r
